-
THE RING COLLECTION is Well Worth the Wait [4K REVIEW]
A trilogy of cursed media make a long-awaited format jump to 4K UHD in Shout Studios’ reference-quality box set
While many classic films have shaped my sense of great horror cinema, I’ll never hesitate to point to Gore Verbinski’s The Ring and Hideo Nakata’s Ring as the films that truly provided the gateway to my love of international horror cinema. It was the unique patience of this film that sunk its claws into me when I was twelve: shocking but not ridden with jump scares (except that one), and substituting copious gore for atmosphere literally soaked to the bone with dread. In seeking out other films like this one, I learned that it was an adaptation of a 1998 Japanese film; Nakata’s Ring was, to my memory, the first international film I had the pleasure of watching. As such, I credit The Ring and Ring as planting the seed for me to seek out and subsequently love films from across the globe.
Over two decades and multiple home video formats since its original release, Verbinski’s remake of the equally iconic film by Hideo Nakata has lost none of its terrifying potency. Following the chilling investigation by a determined reporter (Naomi Watts) into the existence of a cursed VHS tape, The Ring provided a sharp break away from the increasingly comic gorefests of the 80s and 90s. Instead, Verbinski’s film kicked off an era of horror that embraced a cold, dark, excruciatingly slow burn that found its terrors in the inexplicably disturbing imagery our imaginations could conjure up while staring into the darkness late at night.
While the imagery of Samara Morgan’s video still sears into the mind, what truly lingers in The Ring is the bone-chilling depth of the silent, liminal spaces Rachel must navigate during her investigation. Decaying horse stables; cavernous, empty rooms populated solely by a cathode-ray TV and a silver mirror; musty archival rooms full of mildewy newsprint; the sterility of video analysis rooms, full of towering, button-strewn equipment long since obsolete, all now reduced to devices that fit in our pockets. Each of these places speaks to its own form of terror, translating a uniquely millennial tension from J-Horror in Japan to America: one between a modern, technophilic present and the unspeakable, elemental horrors of the past. Verbinski’s excellent direction, coupled with Ehren Kruger’s deft adaptation of Hiroshi Takahashi’s screenplay, results in a film whose horrific universality remains its timeless selling point. The Ring adapts the atmospheric intangibility of J-Horror within a Westernized idiom that blends classic slashers with Hitchcockian suspense (direct homages to Psycho and Rear Window are prominent), creating a form of horror that manages to evolve the prominent modes of horror on both continents. The way Verbinski’s Ring speaks to these grimy, primal anxieties feels unbelievably prophetic in hindsight, recognizing how the nightmares of one era might use these new technological tools to evolve and spread to maintain their impact across generations.
What surely wasn’t expected was just how Verbinski’s film would kick off a viral pop culture epidemic of its own in revealing just how lucrative it would be to remake Asian Horror films in the West. While the results have ranged from the extraordinary (The Grudge, Dark Water) to the atrocious (Pulse, One Missed Call), the truly commendable aspect of the J-Horror remake boom was how it encouraged audiences on both sides of the Pacific to exchange cultural insights into horror filmmaking and find a unique common ground of fear. One particular artistic decision that deserves championing is encouraging the original directors of these Japanese franchises to return for American installments; first pioneered by Takashi Shimizu in adapting his Ju-on franchise to The Grudge in 2004, The Ring Two provided the first opportunity for Hideo Nakata to return to this iconic franchise.
For what it’s worth, I feel an ardent responsibility to defend The Ring Two against its detractors. While nothing could replicate the look and feel of what Verbinski accomplished with The Ring, The Ring Two is markedly open about never once trying to do so. Where The Ring succeeded in re-framing Japanese Horror for American audiences, Nakata’s film feels controversial in how it attempts to directly transplant J-Horror sensibilities into American cinema without feeling obligated to adapt or “Westernize” the material. Instead, The Ring Two manages to capture a unique atmosphere of dread in a way that truly feels like J-Horror on American soil. Nakata does away with the mechanics (and limitations) of Samara’s cursed video as quickly as possible. While Samara does remain an antagonist throughout, there’s little direct battle with her, and no cursed timeline to actively fight against. Rather, the evil of The Ring Two takes on a disturbing free form that invades every moment of Rachel and Aidan’s lives with a terrifying unpredictability. What’s more, this ambiguity roots the dangers and dilemmas this vengeful ghost poses not in the cause-effect of the video, but within the characters themselves, forcing Rachel’s conundrums as a parent with a possessed child to take on a much more intimate and sinister dimension. Their only avenue for deliverance is now rooted in a decision that’s far more horrifying and consequential for them both. It speaks more to the nuanced parental anxieties of something like Dark Water than Verbinski’s more openly terrifying previous film–and it’s a far more emotionally rooted sense of horror than I think American audiences were used to at the time.
The lackluster response to Ring Two and the later “death” of the transcultural J-Horror industry in the latter half of the 2000s effectively trapped the American Ring films in Samara’s well for over a decade. Technology exponentially evolved in the interim; those born around The Ring’s original theatrical release would grow up in a world full of viral videos and social media rather than VHS tapes and physical media. As years passed, returning to the Ring franchise seemed even more difficult to pull off.
If fans of the Verbinski film had their eyes turned to media shelves in Spring 2005, they would find an effectively chilling bridge to Nakata’s sequel via the short film Rings, directed by Jonathan Liebesman (later known for Texas Chainsaw: The Beginning, Battle: Los Angeles, and that weird-ass take on Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles). While only 16 minutes in total, Rings manages to pack in so many damn clever ideas on how to flesh out the American Ring franchise. Following Ryan Merriman’s Jake, killed off in the opening moments of Ring Two, Rings tracks Jake’s initial exposure to the Cursed Video as part of a group of fans who embrace the tape’s hallucinogenic properties and potential clues to life after death. Here, the tape takes on an even more viral dimension than before, set in a world where a thriving underground community has already been exposed and inoculated to Samara’s curse; however, that makes fresh victims and subsequently saving one’s life even more difficult to come by. What Jake is then pushed to do–from badgering his “tail” like an addict in peril to the sheer terrorism of trying to play the tape in a packed electronics store–augments the trolley problem-esque choices of the video to incredibly satisfying and chilling new heights. In its short runtime, Rings viscerally embraces the visual aesthetics of The Ring while remaining fiercely devoted to the emotional struggles of Ring Two, notably the rats/sinking ship dynamic at the core of finding someone to mark for death by watching one’s video copy before meeting their fate at the end of seven days.
Rings (4K UHD) Naturally, Rings also provided a strong canonical foundation for an attempted reboot of the franchise and a possible avenue for how to continue these films in an age of streaming and social media. The result, admittedly, promises far more than it actually delivers. F. Javier Gutiérrez’s feature film of Rings, to its credit, is chock-full of extremely intriguing ideas, with a hell of a bounty of logistical questions well worth answering. Hell, the film opens with the possible answer of “what happens when someone hits their seven days while on board an airplane,” and follows that up with a story focused on the ability to hide videos within videos. The film’s cast of twenty-somethings manages to stand out somewhat amid material whose generic trappings seem more of a death sentence than the mechanics of the cursed video itself; Matilda Lutz’s Julia and Johnny Galecki’s Gabriel in particular stand out as the fish-out-of-water to the curse and a college professor who’s turned his curiosity about the tape into a cult-like status among a growing ouroboros of viewers and tails.
For all of its extremely promising opening strengths, the most disappointing aspect of Rings is how it tosses aside all of its promising ideas to force its story into a bizarre retread and retcon of the first two films. A convoluted investigation into the whereabouts of Samara’s remains forces a re-evaluation of Sissy Spacek’s mother to Samara Evelyn in ways that are totally incongruous and frankly cheap, unfortunately roping in an otherwise game Vincent D’Onofrio to elevate the schlocky material. Much like many b-horror films before it, Rings ends on an abrupt jump scare and the promise of yet another sequel; given the six years that’ve passed since the film’s release, this seems like yet another promise of Rings that will go unfulfilled.
The Ring / The Ring Two / Rings Taken all together in Shout Studios’ long-awaited box set of these films, The Ring Collection illustrates a hell of a journey in the evolving landscape of American horror. Even from the beginning of its origins as a remake to another long-running Japanese series, the Ring films separate themselves by constantly trying to augment and evolve what works about the previous material. Don’t get me wrong, I love other American franchises like the Halloween series–but where those series have tried to go back to the well (lol) and try to capture what made their original film land so hard with audiences, The Ring films never ceased in their attempts to build upon and reinvent itself with each installment in almost a stand-alone quality.
Left: The Ring 2012 Blu-ray. Right: The Ring 2024 4K UHD.
Left: The Ring 2012 Blu-ray. Right: The Ring 2024 4K UHD.
As far as picture quality goes, a standout asset of this set is the source of its delay from the originally announced December date: a brand-new scan of The Ring’s original camera negative in Dolby Vision, supervised by director Gore Verbinski. The Ring is notorious for its cold color palette, but while theatrical versions of The Ring originally represented a more sea-green color scheme, most home video releases have shifted the film’s color grading into a more icy-blue space akin to the film’s poster. The extensive re-grading (or, more appropriately, un-grading) of the film by Verbinski not only sharpens the overall detail of the film’s production design and cinematography, it restores the overall intended look of The Ring in ways that arguably haven’t been properly seen by viewers in over twenty years. The other films in this set are also well worth praise for their reference-quality picture; While The Ring and its second sequel Rings received Blu-ray releases, The Ring Two notably never received such a format upgrade during its original home video cycle, and even The Ring itself notably went out of print for several years before its acquisition by Paramount ahead of Rings’ release. The feature film scans for all of these films are impeccably represented in 4K UHD, providing a significant jump in quality for Nakata’s film in particular. While it’s disappointing that the extended version of The Ring Two (my preferred cut of the film) isn’t also upgraded to 4K UHD, this may have been one of the budgetary sacrifices made akin to the impeccable JFK box set released last December. If that means more materials and cuts can be gathered in one place, I’ll gladly take archival superiority over duplicating feature film cuts across provided formats.
Shout’s assembly of this box set also continues some incredible modern work by boutique labels to collect and preserve major films in the international J-Horror movement. Most of the extant special features for all three films are collected for this release, with some even surprising with HD quality rather than an expected 480p resolution. Jonathan Liebesman’s excellent short film Rings in particular looks quite incredible on this release, despite inexplicably appearing on two of the discs in this set (maybe to doubly ensure it’s seen by Ring neophytes just after The Ring or before The Ring Two). The Ring and the feature version of Rings have had all of their previous special features ported over to this release, and the featurettes present for The Ring Two on their original unrated release and the Rings short film DVD are gratefully included here.
A major new feature on this release, present on the Blu-ray of The Ring, is the feature-length Ghost Girl Gone Global, which provides a decent recap of the original four films of the Japanese Ring franchise by Ring screenwriter Hiroshi Takahashi and Ring 0 director Tsuruta Norio before diving into an extensive history of the development and production of the three Ring remake films. Ring/Ring Two special effects artists Barney Burman and Jamie Kelman, Ring Two production designer Jim Bissell and editor Michael N. Knue, Ring Two/Rings Samara actor Bonnie Morgan, and Rings director F. Javier Gutiérrez join critics Kim Newman and Matt Jacobsen in providing colorful commentary about the genesis and execution of all three films, accompanied by production b-roll and clips from each. While the documentary itself is entertaining, licensing limitations do rear their head as footage from the original Ring films never appears, with footage from the remakes awkwardly substituted in their place. That drawback aside, this is a surprising and welcome inclusion in a box set filled with archival special features, providing production insight that has rarely been afforded to these three films even in their previous DVD/Blu-ray releases.
Another exciting new feature is a new commentary track recorded solely for the Theatrical version of The Ring Two by film critics Emily Higgins of the Tasteless podcast and Billy Dunham of podcast We Watched A Thing, which provides a jovial reappraisal of Nakata’s frankly little-discussed sequel. Throughout, Higgins and Dunham provide an excited appreciation for Nakata’s uniquely J-Horror approach to building tension as a worthy successor to Verbinski’s first film, as well as for the committed performances of returning cast members Naomi Watts and David Dorfman.
Sadly missing, though, are the multiple incarnations of the Cursed Videos across the franchise, in addition to some featurettes present on international releases. Samara’s video was once included as a hidden feature on The Ring’s initial DVD in March 2003, joined by an Aidan cursed video for Ring Two and the original Sadako video from Ring on the Rings short film bonus DVD ahead of The Ring Two’s release in 2005.
The more collecting-savvy Ringworms among us may want to hold onto their previous releases to ensure some features stick around–but these missing elements definitely don’t detract from how frankly necessary this release truly is for horror fans. This is easily the best these films have looked in several decades, especially since The Ring Two in particular is receiving a jump in picture and audio quality that’s twenty years in the making. With the unexpected addition of a new feature-length documentary, alongside the inclusion of as many extra features as possible, Shout Studios cements an appreciation and continued re-evaluation of a now-iconic international horror franchise.
Special Features
Note: Other than where noted, all of the Special Features are relegated to the accompanying Blu-ray discs for each film. Each film is presented in its own UHD case, with all three encased in a hardback, glossy cardboard shell.
THE RING (Discs 1-2)
- Ghost Girl Gone Global: a feature-length documentary featurette by Shout diving into the history of the original and remake Ring franchise.
- Don’t Watch This: A rather artfully curated collection of deleted and alternate scenes, bridged by original and alternate versions of cursed video material. It’s interesting how some of these scenes, notably Rachel’s alternate discussion with her sister Ruth about Katie’s death and Rachel’s perusal of a guest book in the Shelter Mountain cabin, hew even closer to Nakata’s original film and Suzuki’s novel. Another notable spine-tingling inclusion is Rachel and Noah’s intervening return to Shelter Mountain Inn, where they discover that the Innkeeper himself is another victim of the video’s curse.
- Rings: Jonathan Liebesman’s excellent 2005 short film bridging the events of The Ring and The Ring Two.
- The Origin of Terror: A 2002 archival featurette about the cultural history of urban legends, pivoting into the creepy “what if” factor of the film’s central cursed video.
- Cast & Crew Interviews: 2002 archival interviews with Gore Verbinski, producer Walter Parkes, and actors Naomi Watts, Martin Henderson, Brian Cox, and David Dorfman.
- Theatrical Trailer
THE RING TWO (Discs 3-4)
- Theatrical Version Commentary by film critics Emily Higgins of the Tasteless Podcast and Billy Dunham of podcast We Watched A Thing, available on both the UHD and Blu-ray.
- Unrated Version of The Ring Two (Blu-ray Only), running a hefty 23 minutes longer than the theatrical cut (and improving the intended slow-burn pacing as a result).
- Rings: Liebesman’s short film, identical specs from Disc 2.
- Deleted Scenes: 18 minutes of deleted and extended scenes, notably restoring additional subplots with tertiary characters in Rachel’s new home/work life in Astoria, as well as new scenes that further flesh out her relationship with Max.
- Fear on Film – Special Effects: an archival 2005 featurette breaking down the execution of the climactic well chase, the deer attack, and the incredible bathroom scene where water collects on the “ceiling.”
- Faces of Fear – The Phenomenon: The Ring Two’s cast and crew compare the slow dread of the series’ approach to horror to other classic horror films like The Shining and The Omen.
- Samara – From Eye to Icon: Legendary makeup artist Rick Baker joins The Ring Two’s production team in discussing how they achieved the specifically creepy look of Samara for the sequel, in addition to crafting the new backstory featured in the film.
- The Power of Symbols: Screenwriter Ehren Kruger and producers Walter Parks and Laurie McDonald discuss how they built out and translated the disturbing imagery from Hideo Nakata’s original Ring for an American audience in both Verbinski’s original film and Nakata’s sequel.
- The Making of The Ring Two: an archival HBO First Look featurette at The Ring Two’s production accompanied by interviews with the cast and crew.
- Theatrical Trailer for The Ring Two (though sadly missing the wonderfully creepy teaser trailer).
RINGS (Discs 5-6)
- Deleted/Extended Scenes: The troubled production history of Rings is evident in this collection of nearly 20 minutes of excluded material from the film, which apparently went through a radical re-editing process during its delayed release from October 2015 to February 2017. The finished quality of these scenes indicates how late the decision to remove these scenes may have been–and for what it’s worth, a significant selection of these scenes may have improved the pacing of the final cut. An alternate ending feels like more of an extension of what’s already present, and ends on a nice little jump-scare akin to the more successful scenes in Gutiérrez’s reboot.
- Terror Comes Full Circle: The Rings cast and crew discuss the excitement and challenges of returning to the franchise after an extended dormancy.
- Resurrecting the Dead – Bringing Samara Back: an archival featurette focusing on Bonnie Morgan’s Samara, highlighting Morgan’s presence across the franchise as well as the extensive makeup process involved in getting Samara gruesomely camera-ready.
The Ring Collection arrives on shelves March 19th courtesy of Shout Studios.
-
LOVE LIES BLEEDING is a Steroid-Infused Shot of Cinema
Smart and muscular filmmaking from Rose Glass, aided by the one-two punch of Kristin Stewart and Katy O’Brian
Back in 2020, despite a release hampered by the pandemic, Saint Maud seared itself into our psyche. A grim psychological thriller infused with Catholic guilt, that earned a cult following, and planted its star Morfydd Clark (Rings of Power) and writer /director Rose Glass on the map. The filmmaker is back with her sophomore effort Love Lies Bleeding, where she showcases an even firmer grasp on her craft. A shift from the shores of Scarborough to the sands of New Mexico for a love story between two women in a small town that collides with the local criminal element that each have ties to.
Kristen Stewart plays Lou, the manager of a gym in a podunk town just outside Albuquerque. Walled off from customers, and other locals who try to connect with her, until in walks Jackie ( Katy O’Brian). New to town, putting down roots for a few months to earn a buck, and prepare for an upcoming female bodybuilding competition Las Vegas. Their connection is instantaneous, and a sweet and frequently steamy relationship follows, one that stumbles as Lou’s emotional baggage starts to surface. Her sister (Jena Malone) is trapped in an abusive marriage with an odious womanizer named JJ (Dave Franco), who works for their father Lou Sr. (Ed Harris) at a local gun range. Something that serves as a front for his criminal enterprises that seem to revolve around gun running across the Mexican border, and the occasional splash of violence. Matters are further complicated by Jackie’s own ties to this dubious pair of men, owing to her needing employment when she first arrived in town, their love affair continues. As does Jackie’s training, something taken to new heights by the steroids free flowing through Lou’s gym. When JJ puts Lou’s sister into a coma, the pumped up pair react, setting these two lovebirds on a collision course with Lou Sr.’s criminal enterprise.
Set in the 80s, the film perfectly channels that feeling of growth, liberation, and indulgence, reflected in the background showcasing the end of the Bush era, and fall of the Berlin wall. The aesthetic is here too, not just via neon lights, perms, mullets, and mustaches, but a pervading sense of sleaze and sensuality and Americana. Glass and cinematographer Ben Fordesman showcase the beauty in the brawn of Jackie, and the beauty within this relationship that blossoms in such toxic surrounds. Written by Glass, along with Weronika Tofilska, Love Lies Bleeding is a potent entry to the neo-noir genre, but flexes within it’s own space. Something aided by upending what is typically a male-dominated sub-genre. A mix of dark humor, unnerving violence, and an enduring sense of romance. The criminal underbelly of this town offers intrigue, but the catalyst comes from the actions of Lou and Jackie, both in terms of starting trouble, and resolving it. Matters resonate all the more as the film roots Lou’s issues with her own past, and ties to her father’s illicit activities. The film is less interested in a twisty narrative, but more in the fallout, both physical and psychological. Moments tilt into the surreal, muscles flex and crunch, bodies grow and contort in the shadows, exaggerations of visuals and sounds that highlight surges of emotion, both sexual and violent. For Lou, there are flashes of evil acts and a dark, red-lit chasm where secrets are buried, that propel the film into its latter half. This internalized drama, as much as the external was something that fueled Saint Maud, and Glass deploys it effectively here again. This fantastical edge adds to an impressive vibe. Sexy but not staged. Gritty but alluring. A veneer of sweat and grime, and a synth-heavy score make this one of the more alluring trips to the theater you’ll take this year.
O’Harris achieves remarkable shifts from a doe-eyed girl with a dream to a hulking volatile mass that could detonate and take a city block out as she goes. It’s yet another quietly intense performance from Stewart that draws the eye, a gruff figure and fidgety counterpoint to the wide-eyed optimism of Jackie. More is said in her mannerisms and facial ticks about her past relationship with her father than pages of dialogue could convey. What is most admirable, beyond the authenticity in their pairing, is how they elicit an enduring sense of sympathy, even as you become aware of what each of them has done, or might be capable of. Dave Franco nails a loathsome, mullet-totting piece of shit, while Ed Harris exudes quirks and a simmering menace. Another standout is Anna Baryshnikov’s milk-loving chatterbox, whose infatuation with Lou adds some crucial chaos to their best laid plans.
Love Lies Bleeding is smart and muscular filmmaking from Rose Glass, aided by the one-two punch of Kristin Stewart and Katy O’Brian. An unabashedly queer love story about how love can lead you to strange places and questionable decisions, and how despite the flaws within, and tragedy without, the need for connection remains. A pumped up crime thriller that despite all the roid-rage, reminds you that love is the real drug.
Love Lies Bleeding hits theaters on March 15th
-
SXSW 2024: SECRET MALL APARTMENT
Secret Mall Apartment is the kind of documentary that sneaks up on you. The premise is sure to catch the eye of curious viewers. The one-line pitch is that it’s about a group of people who found space in a Rhode Island mall and turned it into an apartment. Sounds amusing, right? Well, it is. It’s also much more. It’s a political statement, a prank, and a deeply humane story, all in one.
In 2003, a group of artists, led by Michael Townsend, concocted a plan to live in the Providence Place mall in Providence, Rhode Island. They found a way to get into the back areas of the building, and then found an area big enough for a living space. So, they set about setting up furniture and making the space into a home. They brought in furniture, a PlayStation 2, and pictures to give the apartment a homely feel. All they were really missing was water, but, hey, they had a whole mall full of public restrooms at their disposal.
There are a few points in the film where the charm of the secret apartment threatens to wear off, but director Jeremy Workman wisely expands the scope of the story. It’s a necessary move that gives Secret Mall Apartment a surprising depth. Every American city has its own story of gentrification to tell, and this mall is part of Providence’s. The location of the mall serves as a line of demarcation for the city. Even the entrances to the mall are difficult to access from the less desirable side of the building. Michael and his co-conspirators used to live in a building that was cleared out to make room for the mall. So, their plan to live in the mall has the tinge of revenge, making it more than a lark.
The film has plenty of amusing anecdotes about the issues one might encounter when setting up an apartment that is startlingly close to thousands of daily visitors. These instances are good for a laugh, like the story of the group lugging over a ton of cinderblocks into the mall to build a wall to hide their domicile. Or the stolen PlayStation incident. But the film ascends in the back half as it digs deeper into the group. This is when Secret Mall Apartment goes from entertaining to a quintessential story of humanity.
As an artist, Michael routinely works in a children’s hospital, making murals out of masking tape. He collaborates with the kids, getting ideas and help from those physically capable. It’s genuinely heartwarming. It also gets into the essential ephemeral nature of…everything. Art, life, connection. The film details the Hope Project, a 9/11 memorial that took five years to complete. The overriding theme that emerges is the idea that meaning is where you make it.
In the end, Michael and his roommates kept the apartment going for four years before getting caught. It was just one of many fleeting, yet memorable, things they accomplished together. It was never going to last forever, nor was that the intent. But it makes for a hell of a story.
-
SXSW 2024: BEN AND SUZANNE, A REUNION IN 4 PARTS
Ben and Suzanne, A Reunion in Four Parts is a shaggy dog story about a couple who finds out the hard way that absence doesn’t always make the heart grow fonder. Like love, Ben and Suzanne isn’t afraid to wear its heart on its sleeve. The film takes a hard look at modern romance through the lens of balancing work and relationships.
After being apart for a long stretch, Ben (Sathya Sridharan) travels to Sri Lanka where Suzanne (Anastasia Olowin) has been working. The opportunity for the two to recapture their spark is there, if only Suzanne’s boss would leave her alone. For Ben and Suzanne, the problem isn’t just overbearing work demands. Who among us hasn’t had a day off wrecked by nagging bosses and coworkers? That’s all too relatable.
Even more relatable, and more difficult to grapple with, is the realization that extended time apart from someone can, and will, irreparably change the course of a relationship. Or completely stymy it. One of the lingering takeaways from Ben and Suzanne is that you can’t hit pause on something as malleable as a relationship without fundamentally altering its course.
What writer-director Shaun Seneviratne captures most succinctly is the fleeting nature of relationships. When they first reconnect, each conversation feels like two people trying to pick up where they left off. There’s a strain to their conversations that will hit home for anyone who’s ever tried holding onto something that’s no longer the way it used to be. Love is always seen as this powerful, nearly unbreakable thing. That feels like the exception rather than the rule. The more time Ben and Suzanne spend together, the more apparent this becomes. Sridharan and Olowin play this dynamic well. Sridharan plays Ben as a guy on the cusp of desperation, while Olowin gives Suzanne the feel of someone whose mind is always a few steps ahead of the present moment. The relationship seems destined to be done, romantically-speaking, they just haven’t realized it yet.
There’s a general looseness to Ben and Suzanne that helps the film stay engaging when it starts to meander. Seneviratne lands the film on a lovely note. He finds a land to deliver a bit of optimism for Ben and Suzanne that doesn’t pander or stoop to schmaltz. For a film about the difficulty of maintaining and growing a relationship, the ending is honest and well-executed.
-
SXSW 2024: Alex Garland’s CIVIL WAR Embeds Us In A Future We Don’t Want
A24 The lens through which writer/director Alex Garland embeds the audience into his alternate future Civil War is, rather ingeniously, that of combat journalists.
So while the scope, scale, and concept of this film is daring and grand, the focus is intimate and claustrophobic, resulting in one of the most tense theatrical experiences 2024 will have to offer. Garland (Ex Machina, Annihilation) introduces us to four main characters with whom we will be embedded as embark on a road trip from hell across a war torn America in hopes of getting an interview with the President before the Western Forces (a secessionist army made up of a coalition of Texas and California) overpower and take control of Washington, D.C., and with it, the nation. Kirsten Dunst’s (Spider-Man, Melancholia) Lee is a hardened and decorated war time photographer and Wagner Moura’s (Elite Squad, Narcos) Joel is a reporter who’s done countless assignments alongside Lee. From the jump we see the ways that Lee and Joel do their jobs, what coping mechanisms they utilize to stay alive and stay sane, and what kinds of moral quandaries they’re put in as they document and bear witness to the unfolding chaos and violence around them. Stephen McKinnley Henderson’s (Devs, Dune) Sammy is an older, wiser reporter who is clearly a mentor to Lee and Joel, and convinces them to take him on their quest to interview the president. And Cailee Spaeny’s (Priscilla) Jessie is a young, aspiring war photojournalist who holds Lee in awe even as she exposes her own naivete.
It was worth the ink to set up these four characters because Garland has structured his film intimately around them as they traverse the ruined countryside in their Ford Excursion emblazoned with “Press” markings, for good or ill. Yes, through these characters’ eyes Garland WILL show us an American Civil War; a kind of nightmare that keeps many of us up at night these days, most in fear, but some perhaps in expectant anticipation. It’s a charged film that may provoke and offend some viewers. But Garland’s choice to unfurl this nightmare for the audience through the perspectives of real characters whom we will come to care for and root for, is crucial to Civil War’s success. As politically charged as Garland’s film obviously is, perhaps its most clear angle or message is the essential nature of a free press to functional society. Our characters aren’t necessarily lionized heroes, but rather they’re depicted with authenticity and nuance and perform a specific and essential role in the events that play out.
A24 There’s an episodic nature to Civil War that allows Garland to pick and choose what horrors to show us while also sidestepping any kind of distasteful “blockbuster entertainment” vibes. To be sure, there is an awe that only cinema can bring as we see iconic American locations under siege, bombarded, and collapsing. It’s evocative in the extreme, and did prompt goosebumps from me as a viewer. But Civil War is a deeply serious film more akin to something like Children Of Men, or more recently 1917. It’s a war film, in the trenches, in the muck and mire. It simply depicts a more charged backdrop (like a ravaged JC Penney, a highway overpass emblazoned with “Go Steelers” that also has bodies hanging underneath, or a drive-through car wash that becomes a convenient place to tie up and torture some looters). Lee at one point shares aloud that her whole vision of her career had been chronicling war as a warning so that this exact scenario would NOT play out in our neighborhoods. Perhaps Garland is similarly transplanting the kinds of images we are used to seeing in foreign countries, on far distant shores, of “others”, and bringing them home to roost. It will remain to be seen if Garland’s visuals prompt any of the same kinds of warnings that Lee’s character tried to send with her imagery. Regardless, the embedded and episodic nature of Civil War allows us to get a breadth of experiences in this wartorn future that help us really understand our main characters and what drives them, as well as exposes their humanity as they wrestle with what they’re seeing and experiencing. From a production standpoint it’s an incredible way to tell an ambitious story without a Marvel-sized budget. From a viewers’ standpoint it draws us into the conflict personally and viscerally, ensuring we understand there is no glorification here, no real “winners”. In some ways it isn’t all that complex: this is a “war is hell” movie. And from the characters’ perspectives they’re drawn deeper and deeper into being on the front lines of capturing history as Western Forces descend on Nick Offerman’s President of the United States.
Garland sidesteps a lot of the potentially offensive or divisive elements that could easily have derailed Civil War. Is it a direct allegory of our current, violently divisive political times? No, it isn’t… but his point is perhaps that war is universal to the human experience and it’s universally bad. Civil War rubs our faces in mass graves and shows us literal snapshots of exact moments when the life leaves a person’s eyes. It’s a profound depiction of a future we do not want, even as we seem to march inexorably towards a deeper division. I’ve heard many question why a movie like this needs to exist now, or whether it’s simply too distasteful of a subject matter to depict in this way. There’s certainly a world where this could have been among the most distasteful films imaginable. And I’m sure Civil War will generate controversy. But cinema is the only artform that can so thoroughly implant you into a fictional world as to transport you into an alternate reality. And Alex Garland successfully enthralls his audience with a world so close to home, and yet so intensely broken, that he gives us space to consider a different path forward. I’m not saying Alex Garland’s film will lead to world peace. I’m simply saying that A24 and Alex Garland did something bold and did it at exactly the right time. Storytellers must take risks and shake us with their visuals and their ideas. Civil War is an intense and profound cinematic experience that uses its medium to shake us violently in hopes that its fiction doesn’t become fact.
And I’m Out.
-
SXSW 2024: BABES Hilariously Charts the Messiness of Maternity and Motherhood
Pamela Adlon’s debut feature is relentlessly funny, and driven by the powerhouse pairing of Ilana Glazer and Melissa Buteau
In our youth, the idea of being an adult is envious. The freedom, both personal and financial, to do what we want, when we want, is very appealing. But as we enter that phase we soon realize, growing up sucks. Responsibilities mount, priorities change, and friendships get tested, often ending as people diverge onto differing paths. Babes distills down the challenges of this heterochrony into a raucous comedy, about two besties Eden (Ilana Glazer) and Dawn (Michelle Buteau), who after 27 years of friendship, face their greatest test thanks to the one-two punch of their back to back pregnancies.
Both Eden and Dawn are strong, vocal, women with a penchant for theatricality and fun. But there are differences. Eden is a breezy but chaotic soul, operating a yoga studio out of her apartment in Astoria. Dawn is a successful dentist, living on the Upper West Side with her dutiful husband Marty (Hasan Minhaj) and toddler. The film opens with the pair fulfilling an annual tradition, taking in a movie on Thanksgiving, despite them now being separated by four train rides and leading rather different lives. The outing is short-lived as Dawn goes into labor. On her journey home from the hospital, Eden has a meet-cute with a man named Claude (a brief but utterly charming turn from Stephan James). Fate, and four shared train rides later, an instant connection emerges, that ends with him staying the night. For reasons not to be divulged here, Claude disappears from the scene and Eden eventually realizes that she is pregnant. Blissfully unaware of the physical and emotional journey ahead of her, Eden decides to embrace the pregnancy, with the support of Dawn, who is similarly unprepared. Not just for the stress this will bring, but also the truth that her second child will be easier to handle than the first.
Co-written by Glazer and Josh Rabinowitz, a former writer on Broad City, Babes does feel somewhat like a “what happened next?” sequel to that cult show. Irreverent, often surreal humor, fused to a smart social commentary. The film is also packed with crude language, whip-smart banter, pop culture references, visual gags, and running jokes, notably one involving about the hairline of their gynecologist (played to perfection by John Carroll Lynch). It’s relentlessly and raucously funny. It’s not just the comedic tone, but also in how the chaotic, consequence free lives of two young women might shift when responsibilities come to bear. These two women are close, we’re talking a level of intimacy that borders on the extremes, even going so far as to track each others locations and share updates on their daily bowel movements. It’s the kind of relationship that is built to last, so in testing it, it underscores exactly how impactful the process of pregnancy and raising a child is.
Babes really charts the ups and downs of pregnancy, and that goes beyond the hormones. The bodily secretions, mood changes, weight gain, difficulty breastfeeding, and not satisfied with exemplifying the body horrors of giving birth with one scene, instead you get two. Beyond the prenatal, the film covers the scope of what comes next to. Dawn is faced with a life juggling her job and home life, the trials of finding childcare, sibling jealousy, all on top of the needs of her ill-prepared friend. Unsurprisingly, she reaches her limit. Even though she self-admittedly has it all, from a career, to a lovely home, to a super supportive and hyper capable partner, it only amplifies the feelings of being a little adrift and alone. It all comes to a head by asking the question, what is family? With this duo’s friendship lasting longer than Dawn’s marriage and children’s ages combined, does it deserve equal priority? Which is where the film digs deeper into these ties, and how friendships, at least those that are destined to last, have to change.
Babes marks the directorial debut of Pamela Adlon’s (King of the Hill, Louie, as well as creating, starring, and directing in Better Things), and it showcases not just her grasp of comedy and timing, but the emotional and technical parts of filmmaking too. She is also blessed with the powerhouse pairing of Ilana Glazer and Melissa Buteau who are just fantastic fuel for the movie, and each other. Performances that reflect the state of honesty and rawness that underscore this friendship and the ethos of the film itself. Some elements of the film are a little weak, notably the lack of any real emotional waves after the departure of Claude, and development of Dawn’s relationship with her absent father (played with fleeting aplomb by Oliver Platt). It’s somewhat understandable, delving into either would tilt the film away from it’s comedic roots and detract from the emotional exploration of the central duo. Some may find the film to end on too tidy a note, but with all the growth and enduring positivity within the film, it’s undeniably a well-earnt resolution. One stemming from these two women finding strength in sisterhood. Maybe it doesn’t come through blood, but it’s certainly earned through sweat, tears, and breast milk.
-
SXSW 2024: OMNI LOOP
Mary-Louise Parker stars as a woman with one week to live, over and over again
Mary-Louise Parker and Ayo Edebiri in Omni Loop. Brazilian-American filmmaker Bernardo Britto’s sophomore feature, Omni Loop, premiered at SXSW yesterday. His time travel drama with comedic tendencies centers around retired scientist Zoya Lowe (Mary-Louise Parker, Fried Green Tomatoes, Weeds) who keeps repeating the same week of her life. Her family learns her fatal diagnosis – there’s a black hole growing at the center of her body which will soon kill her – and drives Zoya from the hospital to live her last days at home. When a nosebleed signals her time is nigh, she takes a special pill and goes back to the start of the week.
Curious about what gives the pills this power, she ropes in science student Paula (Ayo Edebiri, The Bear, Bottoms) to help with her research. As their mentorship forms, Zoya’s selfishness plays off Paula’s guarded optimism. We see the bond grow through their week(s) together. The friendship between the two women is given equal weight as Zoya’s family time, reflecting her feeling of being pulled between family and potential discovery.
Through humor, Omni Loop contemplates themes of self doubt, missed opportunity and the necessity of true connection. The quirkiness of the narrative and the importance of place (in this instance, Miami, Florida) call to mind Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind. But instead of a doomed romance, Omni Loop considers end-of-life issues.
Witty editing (by Britto and Martin Anderson) keeps the film from feeling repetitive, and Ava Benjamin Shorr’s cinematography adds further layers to the storytelling. The technopop scoring by Kaitlyn Aurelia Smith, heavy on synthesizer, and the brutalist architecture of the college campus accentuate the science fiction aspect of the work. Even though there’s a slight slowdown of pacing in the third act, Omni Loop wins the viewer back.
The unique voice, the goofy vibe, and the quietly compelling performances from Parker and Edebiri – as well as Carlos Jacott and Hannah Pearl Utt as Zoya’s husband and daughter – pull the audience in. Omni Loop comes darn near close to a perfect ending, so emotionally potent it had this critic practically weeping in her seat.
Omni Loop screens again at SXSW 2024 this evening at ZACH.
-
SXSW 2024: THE GUTTER Brings Back the Goofball Sports Comedy
Full of sharp social commentary and sweet silliness, this new bowling comedy from the Lester Brothers spares no one.
Sports movies are a dynamic genre. You can give a straight down the middle emotional drama about overcoming the odds. You can make a dark look at the cultures of athletics. Or you can lean into the inherent silliness of grown people playing games for money.
For the Lester brothers, the directors of the new comedy The Gutter, you opt for sneaking the second into the third and mostly give a big middle finger to the first. The plot of The Gutter in the grand strokes is extremely familiar, feeling like a rehash of 1996 cable comedy classic Kingpin. But what Isaiah and Yessir Lester add to the formula is a relentless barrage of jokes that are equally absurd and barbed, ravaging the double standards in sports coverage within a broadly appealing silliness.
Shameik Moore stars as Walt, a young black man bouncing off the walls with seemingly unending energy. After he gets a job at a local bowling alley (mostly out of sympathy,) he befriends Skunk (D’Arcy Carden), a former pro bowler who spends her days drinking at the alley. When the bowling alley faces a steep renovation price or face the reality of the building being condemned, Skunk and Walt hatch a plan for him to win the money for the alley. Yes, that’s the plot; no it’s not the 1990s again.
Shameik Moore and D’Arcy Carden at the SXSW premiere. The story however mostly serves as a gateway for the Lesters’ brand of humor to shine through. Chaotic, outrageous and unapologetically silly, all of the movie’s humor is embodied in Moore’s performance of Walt. He spouts off whatever he had in mind, refuses to wear a shirt unless absolutely necessary, and can’t stop dancing. Moore’s physicality is impressive, hypnotic and most importantly drop-out-of-your seat funny. His performance has all the child-like charm of early Adam Sandler alongside a physic precision closer to a dancer. He is certainly never standing still, often vibrating and shouting one-liners at a nonstop barrage.
Beyond the simple silliness however is a strong streak of social commentary. This is most evident in the plotline focusing on how the wider bowling world responds to Walt’s sudden ascension, both their discomfort in saying the quiet racist subtext of their commentary out loud, but also because Walt’s admittedly outrageous behavior “challenges” the status quo. The point is clear: black people can play white sports, as long as they agree to not be “too black” about it.
This position is mostly voiced by Paul Resier, a sports commentator who tracks Walt’s rise on his television show Bowl Lived Matter. Reset is hilarious, tapping into a different tone of his on screen to be less affable and more like…a pent up racist. His scummiest performance since Aliens.
But Reiser isn’t the only ringer that the Lesters recruited for their villainous, hapless white folk. There is also Susan Sarandon, giving a camp master performance as the traditional bowling champion, Linda Curson. Linda is a text book villain, but the cartoons following she has amongst exclusively white bowling fans underlines how she represents the chance to right things back to normal. Conceited and outlandish in her own way, Linda fills out the classic sports comedy feel the movie tracks in.
On paper, The Gutter would be easy to dismiss as a throwback slobs vs snobs lark. But the amount of unapologetic social commentary and absolute shotgun approach to joke delivery will be a safe solace to fans who like their comedies to be both very clever and very, very stupid.
-
SXSW 2024: ODDITY Delivers Sublime Scares Despite a Shaky Setup
Damian McCarthy’s feature delivers a murder mystery, revenge horror, and ghost movie, all rolled into one
There’s an old adage in soccer, “it’s a game of two halves”. The end result could still go your way in spite of a bad first half performance. The saying could also be applied to Damian McCarthy’s Oddity. As the credits roll, you’re pretty guaranteed a rapturous reception thanks to a barnstorming back half, but the process of teeing that up, is ever so shaky.
The film opens with Dani (Carolyn Bracken) hard at work renovating the new rural home she has bought with her husband Ted (Gwilym Lee). Staying overnight for the first time, she has a tent setup inside the one secure outbuilding, and after locking up and saying goodnight to her husband as he works an overnight shift on his psychiatric ward, hears a noise on the other side of the door. Through the peephole she sees a man with a glass eye (Tadgh Murphy) who tells he saw someone is inside already, and pleads to be let in to help her. Dani is left with a choice, open the door to possible danger, or stay inside where there might be something more chilling than this disheveled figure offering help. One year later, we see the aftermath. Dani died. The man with one eye having been convicted of murder, and identified as a former patient of her husband. Ted has moved on, now living in the completed farmstead with his new girlfriend Yana (Caroline Menton). One person has not let go, Dani’s twin sister Darcy (also Bracken). Blind, due to a form of brain cancer, she owns an Oddities and Antiquities store and also works as a medium, able to touch items and perceive the memories of the owners. When she gets hold of an item belonging to her sister’s apparent murderer, she begins to understand the truth behind what happened that night. On the one year anniversary of the murder, she turns up on Ted and Yana’s doorstep with a family heirloom, a creepy carved, wooden figure, and sets a plan in motion to uncover the truth about that fateful night.
Writer/director Damian McCarthy (Caveat) takes on a fairly big challenge here. After a barnstorming opening, there is a shift in setting up a whole new film really, or rather several. Oddity is a murder mystery, a revenge horror, a ghost movie, all rolled into one. There’s a real sense of unease built here, leveraging claustrophobic locations, darkened rooms, genre shifts, and jump scares to maximum effect. There’s also this ominous (and frankly iconic) wooden figure, ever-present in the corner, frozen in place but perennially on the precipice of action. Adding to all this is Aza Hand’s superbly unnerving sound design and composer Richard G. Mitchell’s brooding score.
Bracken delivers a brief, but endearing turn as Dani, but her slightly off-kilter work as the strong, yet fragile Darcy thoroughly channels the tone and timbre the film aspires to. Similarly, Steve Wall’s snarling work as an orderly at Ted’s hospital offers the right kind of dark malevolence needed to get the audience all the more invested in his part in the plot. This edge of melodrama and scene chewing is sorely needed in the film. Part of the issue in the middle portion comes from other characters being rather thinly written, or veiled moments where plot points or violence is skirted over. It’s a little too simple for it’s own good, neutered to help support the impact of what is to come. But without a doubt McCarthy knows his craft, and with a bit more balance Oddity, could have made for an all-timer. Even still, that final third is indelible in the mind. When Oddity unleashes, it absolutely rips, scorching the screen with intensity and imagery that cumulates with a devilishly wicked final shot that elicits as many chills as it does cheers.
-
SXSW 2024: Ryan Gosling & Emily Blunt’s Chemistry Ignites THE FALL GUY (2024)
Universal It seems reports on the demise of the movie star were premature.
While yes, The Fall Guy is based on a pre-existing IP (a Lee Majors tv show from the 1980s with one of the greatest tv theme songs of all time), it’s not an IP almost anyone below a certain age has even heard of today. Director David Leitch’s version of The Fall Guy is a Hollywood blockbuster built on firm old Hollywood foundations such as cracking dialog, star power wattage, and old school stunt work. It’s also a movie about making movies, which Hollywood has adored since its outset. It’s also the best damn time I’ve had in a movie theater here at SXSW 2024.
The Fall Guy is honestly cinematic catnip for me as an action movie aficionado. But what I think is important to point out is that while there’s a hundred easter eggs for lovers of action movies and stunt work, this movie plays for comedy lovers and romance fans as well. We meet Ryan Gosling’s Colt Seavers when he’s flying high: Hopelessly in love with Emily Blunt’s Jody Moreno. He’s a stunt man and she’s got dreams of being a director. He’s been the go to stunt double for top Hollywood star Tom Ryder (Aaron Taylor-Johnson nailing a hilarious riff on Matthew McConaughey) for years and despite Ryder being a tool, he couldn’t ask for much more. Until he’s majorly injured on set and disappears from the world for a couple years. But when Ryder’s producer Gail (Ted Lasso’s Hannah Waddingham) calls to get Seaver’s to help Jody finish her directorial debut amidst the hush-hushed disappearance of Ryder, he’s on a plane in an instant with a hope to rekindle things with Jody after he blew it.
Everything works when it comes to the romance of The Fall Guy. I’m quite the opposite of a romantic comedy aficionado, but even I can appreciate when sparks fly and obstacles arise and all you want in the whole world is for the guy to make it on time to that date and not spoil everything. It’s a great dynamic that they both clearly love each other, but Jody has been burned and is on the cusp of a major career breakthrough as the director of the mega-blockbuster Metal Storm, a cowboy/alien sci-fi blockbuster. And Colt is trying to help her finish her movie by keeping it under wraps that he’s actually trying to locate her missing star. The whole premise is honestly delightful and makes for enough comedic bits, charming romance, and action set pieces to please all four quadrants. There’s something for men and women, young and old, in this David Leitch vehicle.
But more than anything, The Fall Guy is an unrepentant love letter to the stunt community that has brought us cinematic thrills and chills since the dawn of the medium. While there’s still no Oscar awarded to the stunt community, The Fall Guy’s mere existence is another brick in the wall of the argument that the Academy absolutely must adopt a new award for these crucial talents in cinema. Leitch himself is the perfect blockbuster director to take on this material, as he came up as a stuntman for decades before making the leap to filmmaker with a little known actioner called… John Wick! He’s since tackled various big blockbuster titles to varying degrees of success with Atomic Blonde, Hobbs & Shaw, and Bullet Train. Whatever you thought about any of the films he’s directed thus far, I’m here to say that The Fall Guy is the perfect marriage of maker to material. Leitch is one of the leaders of action design firm 87Eleven, and a branch or offshoot of that action design company, 87North, was heavily involved in this production. So Leitch was simply primed to explode with this material, showing off all that the stunt community can do, honoring, referencing, and riffing on great action cinema quotes and stunts throughout the runtime. He also makes the case for that Oscar, showcasing old school stunts and even breaking a barrel roll vehicle flip record on this production. And he does it all while ALSO simply making a fantastic movie with the perfectly generous cast who are willing to humbly point the spotlight at the behind the camera talent that make movie magic happen.
Speaking of that cast, it isn’t just the leads I’ve mentioned thus far that make an impression. You’ve also got Winston Duke, Stephanie Hsu, and even a damn dog that charms its way through this thing. A cameo or two may also delight audiences who are paying attention.
If I had anything critical to say about the film, it does have some dodgy CG elements in a set piece or two, but those are easily looked over amidst a full on charm offensive and a tongue-in-cheek tone that reveres its action without ever taking itself too seriously. And with any modern genre blend experiment things can get a little overly complicated at times in terms of set pieces that have to have a million moving parts to hold a modern audience’s attention. But those are minor quibbles to be sure, and while mileage can always vary in terms of how much chemistry or subjective humor translates from one person to the next, I personally feel The Fall Guy is one of the most outright entertaining blockbusters audiences will see in 2024.
As has always been the tradition, come for the beautiful people emblazoned on the silver screen, and stay for the laughs and thrills of the characters you’ll come to love thanks to all the below the line talent that work their asses off to make the stars shine. It’s old school, it’s tried and true, and it makes you feel great about going to the cinema again.
And I’m Out.