-
OPPENHEIMER Takes Top Honors with KC Film Critics
Full winners and runners-up for Kansas City Film Critics Circle’s annual James Loutzenhiser Awards
The Kansas City Film Critics Circle voted Saturday, January 27 on their 2023 Awards, identifying Christopher Nolan’s 65mm historical biopic Oppenheimer as the film to beat, winning in six categories including Best Director and Best Picture.
Killers of the Flower Moon competed fiercely with Oppenheimer across the board, and although it garnered a single win, it placed as the Runner-up in multiple categories.
Other notable wins included a pair each for the superbly acted boarding school drama The Holdovers and the mixed-language courtroom mystery Anatomy of a Fall, and an rather unexpected tie for Best Documentary.
Perhaps most notably, KC enthusiastically recognized the coming of age tale Are You There God? It’s Me, Margaret, which has been largely overlooked in this year’s awards season, as Best Adapted Screenplay for its sublime rendering of Judy Blume’s novel.
Full Winners and Runners-up for the 58th Annual James Loutzenhiser Awards:
BEST FILM
Winner: Oppenheimer
Runner-up: Killers of the Flower MoonROBERT ALTMAN AWARD FOR BEST DIRECTOR
Winner: Christopher Nolan, Oppenheimer
Runner-up: Greta Gerwig, BarbieBEST ACTOR
Winner (Tie): Paul Giamatti, The Holdovers; Cillian Murphy, OppenheimerBEST ACTRESS
Winner: Lily Gladstone, Killers of the Flower Moon
Runner-up: Sandra Hüller, Anatomy of a FallBEST SUPPORTING ACTOR
Winner: Robert Downey, Jr., Oppenheimer
Runner-up: Ryan Gosling, BarbieBEST SUPPORTING ACTRESS
Winner: Da’Vine Joy Randolph, The Holdovers
Runner-up: Rachel McAdams, Are You There, God? It’s Me, MargaretBEST ORIGINAL SCREENPLAY
Winner (Tie): Anatomy of a Fall by Justine Triet and Arthur Harari; Past Lives by Celine SongBEST ADAPTED SCREENPLAY
Winner: Are You There God? It’s Me, Margaret by Kelly Fremon Craig, based on the novel by Judy Blume
Runner-up: Killers of the Flower Moon by Eric Roth & Martin Scorsese, based on the book by David GrannBEST CINEMATOGRAPHY
Winner: Oppenheimer (DoP: Hoyte van Hoytema)
Runner-up: Killers of the Flower Moon (DoP: Rodrigo Prieto)BEST ORIGINAL SCORE
Winner: Oppenheimer by Ludwig Göransson
Runner-Up: Killers of the Flower Moon by Robbie RobertsonBEST ANIMATED FEATURE
Winner: Spider-Man: Across the Spider-verse
Runner-up: Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles: Mutant MayhemBEST FOREIGN LANGUAGE FILM
Winner: Anatomy of a Fall, France
Runner-up: The Zone of Interest, United KingdomBEST DOCUMENTARY
Winner (Tie): 20 Days in Mariupol and Taylor Swift: The Eras TourVINCE KOEHLER AWARD FOR THE BEST SCIENCE FICTION/FANTASY/HORROR FILM:
Winner: Godzilla Minus One
Runner-up: Spider-Man: Across the Spider-VerseTOM POE AWARD FOR THE BEST LGBTQ FILM
Winner: All of Us Strangers
Runner-up: Maestro
About Kansas City Film Critic’s Circle:
The KCFCC, the second oldest professional film critic organization in the United States, was founded in 1966 by the late Dr. James Loutzenhiser (1931–2001) who served as the group’s president for over 30 years.
-
Sundance 2024: IGUALADA
A Black environmental activist makes Colombian history in this documentary
Juan Mejía Botero’s latest documentary, Igualada, premiered at Sundance last week. The film follows the historic campaign of Francia Márquez Mina for president of Colombia. A Black woman from a small mining village in rural Colombia, Márquez is a long shot for national office. She is called by others – and claims the term herself – “igualada,” which the open of the film defines as a derogatory term, used towards someone “who acts as if they deserve rights/privileges that supposedly don’t correspond to them.”
An award-winning environmental activist, Márquez is shown on the campaign trail from her initial announcement in 2021 through the 2022 national election. We see the formation of her movement, Soy Porque Somos (I am because we are), and the partnerships she strikes with other left-wing groups to keep her candidacy alive. Thousands of signatures are needed to get her on the ballot in the first place. The danger she faces for her outspoken nature and activism is palpable. The filmmakers emphasize this by including a slideshow of other Colombian activists killed by paramilitary forces/previous administrations in recent years. There are tears as Márquez sends her son out of the country to keep him from harm.
Márquez is a compelling figure, on the campaign trail and off. It’s inspiring to see the growth and momentum of her campaign. Unfortunately, the film itself lacks similar momentum; the pacing can be clunky at times. Editing cuts too often to a previous documentary (from 2009-2010) for footage, halting the flow of the main narrative.
However, I appreciate the style in which the documentary incorporates music as protest. While at campaign stops or marching in the streets, women sing songs of protest. Songs from La Muchacha pepper the film, underscoring the activist stance and unique background of this candidate.
Igualada seems an honest depiction of this campaign, as disorganized as it is. When the candidate faces racism and sexism online and at in-person events, Márquez speaks up about it and against it. She’s unafraid to stand up for what she believes in and hopes to represent marginalize voices in her country. This makes Botero’s film a moving portrait of the candidate and her historic run for office.
Igualada is available on Sundance online through the end of the day.
-
Sundance 2024: BRIEF HISTORY OF A FAMILY
A chilling domestic thriller on the aftereffects of China’s One Child Policy within one family
Brief History of a Family is the stunning surprise among the films I saw at Sundance this week. The domestic thriller is the debut feature from Chinese director Jianjie Lin. Using a distinct visual style and creative sound design, Lin’s film portrays a growing menace within a middle-class family who takes in a teen boy.
After Shuo Yan (Xilun Sun) is hit on the head with a ball thrown by another student, Wei (Muran Lin) leads him to the nurse and eventually invites him home to play video games. As the Tu family comes to know Shuo, so does the viewer; Sun’s performance as Shuo is so quiet and reserved as to be constantly mysterious. We learn that his mother died when he was 10 and his father is abusive when drunk (which is often).
It’s obvious that Shuo’s family comes from less money than the Tus. He marvels at their bright, open apartment and wears the same hoodie and dark t-shirt for at least a third of the film. As he is a good student, attentive and polite, Mr. and Mrs. Tu (Keyu Guo, Red Cherry) welcome him into their home. Their son Wei, in contrast, is spoiled, selfish, and obsessed with video games and fencing. The difference between the boys is also illustrated in their costuming. As Shuo becomes more involved with and accepted into the family, he begins wearing Wei’s lighter clothing, whereas Wei dons darker clothes, feeling separated from his parents.
The cinematography in Brief History of a Family uses circular framing (it reminded this critic of 2016’s I Am Not Madame Bovary) sparingly to portray a sense of removal or surveillance. As Mr. Tu (Feng Zu, Coming Home) is a biologist, an obvious parallel is a view through a microscope. The shot composition by cinematographer Jiahao Zhang throughout this drama is artfully arranged. The apartment is thoughtfully composed by the production design team; a room divider made of glass distorts the audience’s view when the camera shoots through it. Sporadic electronic scoring accentuates the pacing of the film and adds an additional feeling of distortion, especially when compared to the melodic classical music Mr. Tu so appreciates.
Through discussion between the couple and in their talks with Shuo, the audience sees their hopes for the second child that couldn’t be (due to national policy at the time) reflected in him. They make the boy feel welcomed and appreciated after he becomes orphaned. There’s no cunning on his part, although another character’s paranoia feeds into that of the viewer.
This is a thriller with no jump scares, just a persistent unsettling feeling that pervades the work. I wanted to watch Brief History of a Family again soon after I finished to catch clues or visual hints I might have missed. It’s that impressive of a film, with memorable visuals and performances that remain on the viewer’s mind hours later.
Brief History of a Family is available on Sundance online through tomorrow.
-
Sundance 2024: SUGARCANE
A contemplative documentary on the lingering effects of Catholic residential schools on the Indigenous community
Co-directors Julian Brave NoiseCat and Emily Kassie use a layered storytelling style in their documentary, Sugarcane, which premiered at Sundance Film Festival. The main subject of their film is the discovery of unmarked graves at St. Joseph’s Mission, one of many former boarding schools for Indigenous children in Canada, and the impact this has on the community. The filmmakers follow storylines of a couple elders of the Williams Lake First Nation, Charlene Belleau, a survivor and investigator, and Rick Gilbert, survivor and former chief. It also happens that Ed NoiseCat, the director’s father, was born at the school “and thrown away,” in his own words.
Belleau and her team begin to uncover the depth of abuses and wrongs done by the Catholic Church at this school, a continuation of her decades of work for justice. Sugarcane includes heartbreaking descriptions of rape and physical violence perpetuated by the priests and staff, asking the viewer to be a witness. Segments included from a 1960’s-era CBC documentary about residential schools serve as additional proof of the unsettling environment the children were forced into. As one survivor comments, “I’ll never forget, and it’s pretty hard to forgive.”
Former chief Rick Gilbert is invited to the Vatican for a group visit with the Pope, alongside other leaders of tribes affected by Catholic residential schools and their aftermath. The scenes of Gilbert and his wife at home provide some levity to what can be an emotionally heavy film. But a couple quiet shots of Gilbert, alone and in a church and later pensive outside a press gaggle, make for the most memorable images in Sugarcane. He has a face of such character that it’s hard to look away from, and the filmmakers (director Kassie also served as cinematographer) realize that.
Sugarcane is a meditative indictment of the Church and a society (including our own) that would allow such schools to operate. Director NoiseCat and his father Ed allow an intimate look into their strained, recovering relationship, a personal example of the traumatic damage from these schools. A powerful work of investigative journalism, the film serves as a reminder that trauma can be generational.
Sugarcane won the Grand Jury Directing Award: U.S. Documentary at Sundance today and is available to stream online through Jan. 29.
-
Sleuths for Truth: A TRUE DETECTIVE Roundtable – Season 4, Episode 2
In week 2, the roundtable expands as everyone tries to ask the right questions about the Rust Cohle connection, the corpsicle, and the rowdy lovelife of Liz Danvers
Before we dive into this week’s episode, let me first remind everyone… there will be spoilers. So let this serve as a SPOILER WARNING and if you’re caught up with the show, we hope you’ll stay, share your theories, and let us know what you think about True Detective: Night Country. We’ll be posting every week on Wednesday or Thursday (or in the case of this week, Friday, due to my not feeling well this week) with our latest thoughts on what happened and what we think is going to happen. If you’d like to join in next week’s post, you can submit your thoughts to me at [email protected] by 11:59 PM EST Tuesday.
As Sarah predicted last week, the Internet trolls were out in full force complaining about the first episode all week long leading up to Episode 2’s drop on Sunday. Complaints almost all seemed rooted in the lack of a strong or likable male lead character and the focus on two strong females front and center. The trolls attempted to guise their true motives in some cases, while in others outright complained about not having any male protagonists to latch onto. This is nothing new for female centered television and film, sadly… but the overall response from people worth listening to seemed rather positive.
As we dive into week 2, the show has begun to build out its world, as well as its connections to the first season – in both (all but) confirming that Travis Cohle is indeed Rust’s deceased father and the involvement of the Tuttle United corporation. Exactly how deep these connections will go remains speculative, but the episode makes a point to begin to truly develop the backstories, connections, and characters at play in our small Alaska town.
This week, Sarah and Brad return to discuss this latest episode with me, and we’re also joined by Cinapse’s own Brendan Foley and my wife, Brooke Harlan…
Sarah Jane
Ooo wee, this second show did not disappoint!
This episode had everything; a giant corpsicle, stone cold bitchiness, Doctor Who having sex…
In this week’s installment, after removing the bodies of the Tsalal researchers from the ice and installing them in the town’s ice rink to thaw, Danvers and Office Pete discover that the men are all naked and have some weird-ass injuries. Well, that’s after finding out that one of them IS STILL ALIVE. What?! They also discover a spiral on one of the men’s foreheads. That spiral is important because it also is the same spiral that another researcher had tattooed on his chest. A symbol, I think, might also be from season 1 of the show. Look, I could be wrong here. I do think there were a couple of nuggets thrown our way, though, when the last name “Cohle” was mentioned. I believe Detective Rust Cohle had said that he and his father had spent some time in Alaska. Again, could be wrong, but it would be awesome if they managed to tie this season to the first one.
Still loving the performances here. Everyone is on top form. I knew Christopher Eccleston was in the show and he pops up here as Captain Connelly. It was mentioned in the show that he was the one that “appointed” Danvers to her role as Chief. They are apparently fuck buddies, as well. That scene with those two was just as much a “jump scare” as anything else in the show so far. I’m totally not a prude, don’t get me wrong, it was just that I wasn’t expecting it. Get out of here with the “Eww, it’s olds having sex. Gross!”. People older than 50 do have sex, ya know?
(@FookThis on X)
I’m totally onboard with this season. As I mentioned last week (I think, anyway), I’ve loved each season of True Detective. Some seasons take an episode or two to really get into it but I’m hooked from the beginning with Season 4. Maybe it’s the fact that we’re in a place pretty foreign to me, for the most part. It’s cold, it’s dark, it’s got those Thing vibes going on, and that giant meat sculpture… I kinda want it in my house.Brad Milne
Episode 2 of True Detective‘s 4th season picks up where the first episode left off – throwing the audience into the heart of the investigation. Of course it wouldn’t be an episode of True Detective if there weren’t complications. These complications mostly arise from the introduction of Captain Ted Connelly, played with beleaguered authority by the always excellent Christopher Eccelston. While Danvers is preoccupied with trying to solve the riddle of how to move the arrangement of bodies of the deceased frozen in the ice, she receives a call from Lulu, the office secretary, that she should perhaps return to the station. At the Ennis station, after some back and forth between the two characters who have an easy familiarity with one another. However, Connolly thinks it would be best for all involved if the bodies were moved – which Danvers is against vehemently and takes to quoting the official rule book at her superior with deference but unquestioned authority. It’s a nice moment between two great actors, which the series has become masterful at displaying.
Threads of connective tissue between season one and this season are becoming more pronounced. True Detective‘s first season begins to loom large in the second episode. The connection that was hinted at in the first episode is cemented, with the confirmation that the Travis who’s ghost dance at the end of the first episode lead, to Fiona Shaw’s Rose Agunieau to the discovery of the scientists at the Tsalal arctic research station frozen in the ice on the lake that surrounds Ennis, is in fact Rustin Cohle’s father. There is also the mention of Tuttle United which was obviously integral to the investigation in the first season of the show. There are other connections as well, but they feel too much like spoilers.
As much as this season is leaning into connections to the first season, Night Country is also leaning in heavily to the horror elements much like the first season. Especially with the terrified guttural screams of one of the men from the corpsicle as he awakens from his frozen tomb, in the episodes cold open. The corpsicle itself is something bordering on nightmare fuel. The corpses of the men frozen in obvious states of terror, with wounds consistent with self infliction, like trying to chew off their own hands, caused by hypothermia.
The strong feminine energy that permeated the first episode continues in episode 2. Danvers and Navarro continue to impress upon the viewer that these two are not women who are waiting to be saved. They are women who take control. Navarro in episode one and Danvers in episode 2 are shown as sexual creatures but never through the male gaze, which works to the shows benefit. It is clear that they are not women to be easily cowed, which is a much more realistic interpretation of the feminine than the series had leaned into much before.
Much like in episode one the unrelenting cold feels like a character of its own. Brought on by the permanent midnight in the town. Every scene out of doors you can feel the chill of the characters.
The same thrill I got from episode one of the series, I had for episode 2. I am along for the ride right until the end.
(@BradMilne79 on X)Brooke Harlan
This week’s episode began revealing some new tiny crumbs and added more layers to the mystery. We now know that Rust (from Season 1)’s father was the weird ghost guy who pointed Rose to the direction of the corpsicle (kinda love that Danvers repeatedly uses this term throughout the episode). Also, the Tuttle family is behind the funding of the Tsalal research facility. And, that damn spiral is back.
And what about the flashbacks both Navarro and Danvers keep having? And the weird one-eyed polar bear that keeps showing up? They both seem to have some big time tragedies in their pasts and they are both so hardened and angry. Hopefully we get to learn more backstory there, because right now there are more questions than answers.
A few of my favorite parts of the episode:
Watching the truck drag a trailer with corpsicle aboard (covered with a tarp of course) thru the town while The Beach Boys’ “Little Saint Nick” plays. It brought a little levity to the horror that has just been discovered.
The (first) guy who somehow survived said corpsicle? I’m anxious to see if he actually recovers so he can reveal more information as to what happened. But I’m not optimistic because he probably lost his mind during the process. And then of course Clark, who has somehow gone missing during the thaw. How does one survive that? It’s gotta be supernatural.
And finally, finding the creepy trailer with the straw dolls and the spirals and the life size straw body on the bed was creepy as hell, especially with no light. Have I mentioned I just love the dark and cold of the winter Alaskan setting. It’s so different than past seasons and really amplifies the creepiness and horror of the story.
(@brookiellendesigns on IG)Brendan Foley
The thing that’s most striking to me across these first couple episodes, this second one in particular, is how much Lopez is weaponizing the location of her story to further the feeling of overwhelming dread. Huge plains of seemingly infinite darkness surround the characters during every exterior scenes. Many is the overhead shot where a particular car or home appears to be the lone tiny star in an utterly empty sky. Beyond lending one helluva lot of production value to the proceedings, this embracing of that emptiness makes it all too easy to believe that Ennis, Alaska really is a place where the dead walk freely amongst the living.
As for the plot of the episode, look, that opening shock is so, well, shocking that even if nothing could possibly top the screaming corpsicle, that’s more than enough to impress. But Lopez also deserves credit for how nimbly she handles the procedural element of what’s shaping up to be a big, sprawling case (or cases) involving scientists, polluting mines, murdered native women, cultists, True Detective season 1, and whatever mysticism is in the offing.
It all leaves me pretty damn amped to see where things go next.
(@TheTrueBrendanF on X)I have the privilege and advantage of reading everyone else’s thoughts before working on my contribution to the weekly roundtables – thus, I don’t have to do much recap and most of my thoughts have been shared by others by the time I compile everything and add my twist. This is the case again, as the contributors here have covered most of what was going through my head throughout this episode.
But, as I thought more on everything I had a few things to add, so let’s start with the water. At first glance, this season seems to be moving in a supernatural bent. However, I think we may find that the water pollution is the cause of the dreams and visions. I think there’s a chance that there’s a poisoning that is affecting the minds of the townsfolk. Much like Rust’s visions had a more scientific explanation in his mental health and substance issues, I think the visions here could be happening – at least, in part – due to the poisoning of the water.
Another important thing that I can’t help but keep dwelling on is that it seems almost certain that Hank Prior was the Chief before Danvers was appointed. This seems to suggest that he was the Chief when Anne Kowtok died. Thus, I can’t help but assume that the file his son swiped from him for Danvers could lead to implicating him in some form of cover up. Perhaps I just dislike him enough to want him to be the bad guy, but it seems at least plausible.
All this said and done, it’s hard not to get sucked in by this story, this world, and this great acting. Lopez’s writing and direction have been top notch so far and the cast feels perfect in how they are telling this story.
Can’t wait to see what comes next of the corpsicle, the story of Travis Cohle, the importance of the carcosa (the spiral thingy), and the involvement of Tuttle. Without the Season 1 connections, I feel like this season would still be engrossing, but with these connections I’m addicted to it and waiting for my next fix.
Next Week’s Episode
-
THE UNDERDOGGS – Snoop Dogg Tackles Sports Comedy with Hilarious Excess
If you like sports movies, you know this one: a washed-out professional sports figure gets himself in trouble and, much to his dismay, finds himself coaching a scrappy team of losers as punishment. (Later, he’ll probably get a chance to advance his career like he wanted, but choose the kids instead).
It’s a tried-and-true formula that hearkens back to classics like The Longest Yard and The Bad News Bears, and when it’s done right, it feels like a cozy blanket.
The Underdoggs is not the best film in this tradition. Nor is it even the best one in recent memory – I’d put last year’s Next Goal Wins and The Champions (both of which are excellent) ahead of it without hesitation. But while the new football comedy starring Snoop Dogg and Mike Epps is far from the most charming or endearing story of this kind, it is among the funniest, and most edgy.
Snoop Dogg stars as Jaycen “2 Js”Jennings, a self-absorbed retired pro football star who made his millions but never picked up any life lessons along the way. He’s among the best to have ever played the game, but also the most hated. A reality check comes in the form of a hefty community service penalty that puts him back in his hometown of Long Beach, a place he left and never looked back.
While he’s unenthused about the homecoming, getting back in touch with his old homeboy (Mike Epps), former sweetheart (Tika Sumpter), and high school football coach (George Lopez) reminds him about a part of himself – maybe the best part – that he’d left behind, and after taking a peewee coaching job for all the wrong reasons, he comes around to loving the kids and wanting to inspire them to succeed.
The kids are a fun and motley bunch of scrappy geeks and losers, mostly from poor families – underdogs. It’s a charming, if very foul-mouthed, group. As Jennings starts to get to know them we peel back the layers of their various insecurities and problems.
The film is directed by Charles Stone III, who already boasts a really solid sports comedy background with the affably-natured winners Uncle Drew and Mr. 3000. As a comedy, The Underdoggs acquits itself well – it’s very funny, and in that sense I think it’ll be a crowd-pleaser. But it’s far more tonally edgy than those films, with wall to wall f-bombs and vulgarity despite the fact that it’s about – and seemingly targeted to – kids and families.
The film opens by displaying content advisory warning parents that the film is rated R for language, then countering “But fuck all that” and admonishing parents to calm down and enjoy the show, but even so it’s surprisingly naughty. R rated comedies aimed at kids or family audiences are a really tough nut to crack, and always feel tonally confused. This one is no exception.
Besides the constant vulgarity, another thing parents would want to be aware of is that for a sports movie, it champions poor sportsmanship. Obviously it’s a comedy and the edgy stuff is for fun (and it is), but the sanctioning and encouragement of trash-talking and showboating instills the wrong values to kids who may watch. There’s also one scene where Jennings asks one of the kids if he’s ever felt up a girl’s breasts. It’s played for laughs (the kid gets nicknamed “Titties” and it’s eventually even printed on his jersey), but regardless of the context, a grown man randomly asking a prepubescent child about his sexual experience is vile and creepy – full stop.
While Jennings is building relationships and getting to know and like the kids – and building up some narrative goodwill with the audience, he’s also hosting a podcast about himself, boasting in earnest about how much he’s inspiring and helping them. This soliloquy is clearly intended to be endearing but instead makes him transparently a self-aware opportunist, grasping for credibility. It’s bafflingly tone-deaf.
Overall, The Underdoggs is a very funny and enjoyable film, though not one I’d want my kids to watch. It follows a very familiar sports comedy trope, but to its credit tries to do something new with it – even if that’s mostly summed up as being as vulgar as possible and brimming with an excess of attitude. Epps acknowledges the trope by joking at how the situation mirrors The Mighty Ducks, tipping off the audience that the film does have a sense of self-awareness.
It think the best compliment I can pay to The Underdoggs is that there’s a particular kind of pissy but satisfying movie – not a genre, but more of a “fuck you” attitude – that plays especially well when you’re in a bad mood, and I think for a lot of people, this could really be one of those movies.
A/V Out
-
Sundance 2024: SEEKING MAVIS BEACON
This quest to find a former model for a computer game is an absolute joy
No one is seeking out Carmen Sandiego because we’re all aware she’s a fictional creation from a late ‘80s computer game. But Mavis Beacon, the name associated with a typing tutor game of the same era, seems more like a real person. Filmmaker Jazmin Jones and friend/associate producer Olivia McKayla Ross go on a sort of spiritual quest to find Mavis — or rather the woman who modeled for the software company — in Seeking Mavis Beacon. This fun nonfiction work premiered as part of the NEXT program at this year’s Sundance Film Fest.
Colorful and kinetic, the film touches on themes of media representation and inclusion (or lack thereof) in tech, all while playing with storytelling structure. Dreamlike editing weaves elements of their search for Renee L’Esperance along with scenes of the two filmmakers goofing off in their vibrant office and elsewhere, with interviews interspersed. There’s an overall sense of play to Seeking Mavis Beacon, which is fitting since, at least on the surface level, it’s about a computer game.
We learn the myth behind the discovery of Mavis (as well as the importance of myth) and hear from the male creators of the game, and later the erstwhile fiancee who actually ran into L’Esperance in a department store and found her to be a stunning possibility for a model. From the visionary open to the anti-conclusion, Seeking Mavis Beacon entrances and informs the viewer. As much as the work is a search for a woman who doesn’t want to be found, the film centers and celebrates the friendship between Jones and Ross. We see their relationship evolve through the years of filming, growing closer despite the miles between them.
Seeking Mavis Beacon is an energetic exploration, a warm hug of a film as these two welcome us into their space. Jones is a fresh voice in nonfiction film making and I’m excited to see what she does next.
Seeking Mavis Beacon is available to stream through Sundance online Jan 25-Jan. 29.
-
Sundance 2024: BLACK BOX DIARIES
A Japanese journalist documents her fight for justice
“All I want to do is talk about the truth,” filmmaker Shiori Ito tells the camera. In her debut documentary, which premiered at Sundance Film Festival this week, Ito relates to the viewer the challenges she faced in Japan after holding a press conference in 2017. Once the Tokyo Police Department refused to press charges against her rapist, this press conference was Ito’s attempt to bring media attention to her case… especially since her alleged attacker was a fellow journalist with friends in high places.
Black Box Diaries follows Ito through several years, folding hidden recordings she made during visits with police into her larger story. Before #metoo, her story is quashed in mass media, so she publishes a book about her experience. Handwritten journal entries appear onscreen, providing a timeline as well as a sense of her feelings in the moment.
Given that this film is a work of investigative journalism, Ito is impressively open and frank with the viewer. We see the emotional and career damage she has suffered as a result of the 2015 assault. Along with chilling hotel security video footage showing her being forcibly taken out of a cab, Ito shares glimpses into her panic attacks, exhaustion, shock and other symptoms of trauma she deals with regularly.
The visuals used during the recorded audio segments lean towards the generic, using downtown or street scenes; what the film lacks in creative vision, it makes up for in its unique voice. Black Box Diaries packs an emotional wallop. Two scenes — both of them moments when Ito is surprised by unexpected support — moved this critic to tears. The investigator who has aided her confesses, “I think this case will stay with me forever,” even as he keeps his job on the police force and can’t support her publicly.
Ito’s film delves into the outdated rape law in Japan, the stigma suffered by rape survivors who report their assault, and the director’s personal campaign to attain some sense of justice despite a system working against her. Black Box Diaries makes for an intense view (Ito thoughtfully places a trigger warning for other survivors at the start), but the documentary offers a powerful and moving glimpse into one survivor’s journey.
Black Box Diaries is available to stream through Sundance online Jan. 25-Jan.29.
-
FLESH+BLOOD: Paul Verhoeven Retrospective [Two Cents]
Two Cents is a Cinapse original column akin to a book club for films. The Cinapse team curates the series and contribute their “two cents” using a maximum of 200-400 words. Guest contributors and comments are encouraged, as are suggestions for future picks. Join us as we share our two cents on films we love, films we are curious about, and films we believe merit some discussion. Would you like to be a guest contributor or programmer for an upcoming Two Cents entry? Simply watch along with us and/or send your pitches or 200-400 word reviews to [email protected].
The Pick: FLESH+BLOOD (Paul Verhoeven Retrospective)
Cinapse is relaunching Two Cents for 2024 with a focus on cinematic discovery and discussion. This column is intended to generate points of connection as cinephiles revisit beloved classics or explore new territory together. We’ll kick things off with a curated month of Paul Verhoeven titles that our team was eager to either revisit or experience for the first time. After Ed’s Robocop revisit and Dan’s critique of Showgirls, and Julian’s take on Benedetta – Dan is back tackling the director’s English language debut.
The Team
Dan Tabor:
Continuing our deep dive into the filmography of the Dutch auteur Paul Verhoeven brings us to the beginning – Flesh+Blood the director’s first American film released in 1985 by Orion pictures, who would later release Robocop. This was a first time watch for me and within the first few minutes it was shocking just how packed this one film is with themes, motifs and visuals that would haunt the director’s work throughout his career. It’s the medieval story of a group of mercenaries who are double crossed when they help retake a castle only to be driven out before they are allowed to claim their prize, which was being able to loot the castle’s previous tenants for 24 hours. The lord, fearing there would be nothing left for himself, has them driven out, breaking his bargain and driving the troop away.
After the mercenaries find a statue of St. Martin, which also happens to be the name of their roguish leader, played here by a post Blade Runner Rutger Hauer, they believe they are now charged by the saint to take back what’s rightfully theirs. This begins with an assassination attempt/raid on a convoy that just so happens to also include the promised virgin bride for the lord’s son Agnes, played here by a fresh faced Jennifer Jason Leigh. She is captured by the group, brutally raped and taken by Martin as his captive as they soon setup residency in another castle they happen upon, after taking out its previous tenants. Of course the son of the lord comes to Agnes’ rescue, but the thing about this film is everyone is terrible or unsympathetic in their own way.
Even the virginal Agnes, before being kidnapped, forces her lady in waiting to have sex with a soldier in front of her to learn about the “birds and bees”, this is after the lady protests that she is not really into the idea. When Agness has then seen enough however, she then attacks them forcing them to stop, like you would two dogs mating. The film really works to drain every drop of romanticism and moral ambiguity out of every medieval story you’ve read, seen or heard. This is because Verhoeven doesn’t shy away from any of the lurid details or repercussions that would normally be omitted for the benefit of the audience. While Hauer is predictably a delight here as the ambitious antihero, it’s Jennifer Jason Leigh who steals the film for me. She takes a role that while basically having her naked and assaulted for the majority of the film, manages to cull enough room to infuse it with this very powerful performance of a woman doing literally anything in an attempt to survive, from being betrothed without even knowing her husband to being assaulted by a group of mercenaries.
I think this role worked to show what Leigh was capable of while doing the transitional thing expected of female actors IE getting naked, to show they aren’t a kid anymore, which adds a whole nother level to the meta nature of this character. She would even go on after this film to work with Hauer again in the great cable staple The Hitcher. Hauer apparently had a lot of issues with his character, since he was tired of being typecast as the villain and the script went through a lot of revisions throughout production. The film was originally envisioned about the friendship between Martin and Hawkwood (Jack Thompson) and how it disintegrated over time. But when the love triangle was introduced by the studio, it really worked to color the characters involved much differently. While this was Verhoeven’s fifth film with Hauer, it’s rumored that these changes were the final straw in their on screen partnership.
Flesh+Blood is fascinating since it contains this DNA that would show up throughout Verhoeven’s career and is a rough watch, but that’s the point here. When a castle was sacked, terrible things happened. When a betrothed woman was kidnapped by a handsome villain, that was definitely very non-consensual. There was a very modern approach to the sometimes vague morality of these stories that I wasn’t expecting, and it makes this film way ahead of its time in that respect. The performances here are also really interesting because they aren’t really trying to win you over. They are just trying to present the truth of their respective characters and given the times were terrible, I assume that was the point. Flesh+Blood was far more shocking and lurid than I expected after watching the trailer and it’s a film that is hard to recommend given its content. But I can say if you’re a fan of Verhoeven and haven’t seen this one, you’re definitely missing out on one of his best.
Ed Travis:
We’re all just trying to stay alive in this fucked up world. And we’ll do, say, screw, or double cross virtually anything or anyone to just keep drawing breath as swirling forces, powers, rulers, fate, or plagues threaten to end us.
Paul Verhoeven’s medieval lightning rod Flesh + Blood out Game Of Thrones’ Game Of Thrones in its medieval/1985 pitch black vision of flailing humanity and the quest for power. I have to admit I didn’t get this film watching it ages ago both as a more naive human being and as someone who hadn’t yet experienced the glory of George RR Martin’s Westeros. In my younger years I looked for heroes and examples of sacrifice and gallantry in my films. I’d be lying if I said I didn’t still love and crave those things. But it used to confuse me when a film like Flesh + Blood came along with protagonists like Rutger Hauer’s Martin or Jennifer Jason Leigh’s Agnes. Hauer is a “sell sword” following religious signs whenever they suit him and leading a thieving band of outlaws on a quest for revenge against a lord who sold them out after they fought for him in a battle.
Agnes is royalty betrothed to that lord’s son who is kidnapped by Martin and his men. The younger Lord, Steven (Tom Burlinson) will quest to rescue Agnes and destroy Martin, while using progressive science as his weapon of choice. And the specter of bubonic plague haunts the film at every turn. Verhoeven crafts an uneasy and inhuman world, stripping characters of their humanity and any measure of control of their situation, with all doing monstrous acts simply to save their own skin or making split second decisions of loyalty when the winds of change blow one way or the other. It’s dark and cynical, but it feels like it has more to say about what mankind is capable of than, say, an idealized Camelot with redemptive magic and chivalry behind the helm of every knight in shining armor. Religion, science, and even wealth will all be spurned at the chance to simply draw breath one moment longer.
Our Guests
Dominic Hart:
Flesh + Blood is an odd and fascinating beast of a movie. A revisionist take on the medieval epic that shuns chivalrous heroes and swooning lovers for a world filled with grime, plague, and utter amorality. As Verhoeven’s first Hollywood movie, it works best as a Rosetta Stone for the themes that would pervade his later work: religion, sex, violence, and a fixation on impulsive self-gratification in society. What starts as a tale of revenge between Rutger Hauer’s cutthroat mercenary Martin and the lord who betrayed him gradually spirals into a psychosexual drama between him and Jennifer Jason Leigh’s Agnes, the kidnapped bride-to-be of the lord’s son, Steven.
You can feel Verhoeven working through his pessimistic views on society and organized religion in this one. The poster’s tagline reads “A mirror of our time”, and the reflection is deeply unflattering. Nearly everyone who appears on screen is a complete bastard; vicious, capricious, and superstitious to the extreme. Martin’s crew of undesirables in particular operate on such a goldfish-brained level of existence that a woman cries over her stillborn son at the beginning of a scene and by the end of it is cheering at the skewering of a man who dares to question a sign from the heavens that places Martin as their leader. Religion at large is treated as a malleable tool to validate the powerful, a potent set of symbols that are ultimately as flimsy as the communion wafers Martin stuffs in his mouth like handfuls of popcorn. Martin manipulates his crew into believing his whims are the word of God, and when he takes liberties with the band’s ethos of equality, it is their priest who is always the first to sanction his hypocrisies.
Martin himself feels like Verhoeven’s first sketch at the violent messiah icon he would go on to perfect in RoboCop. One shot even frames Martin, sword in hand, foregrounded against a burning wagon wheel that wreaths his head like the halo of a saint. But whereas Alex Murphy is a good man in a corrupt world, here Martin and the world he lives in are equally deplorable.
Even the survivors of violence in this world are not afforded the luxury of innocence. Agnes survives in relative safety and comfort only by becoming Martin’s woman and earning his protection. She is not a heroic figure per se, her self-preservation often leads her to stand back and weigh her options rather than doing the “right” thing (even when it comes to saving her own fiancé’s life) but she remains compelling because of the push and pull between her ideals and what is practicable in keeping herself alive.
Verhoeven leaves no room for valor or virtue. In a career that would be defined by both interrogating and feeding our need for indulgence, he seems to be casting off any concern for morality as he takes his first steps into Hollywood. For morality, in a diseased land, is too restrictive for the powerful and far too dangerous for the vulnerable.
Dominic is a writer, colorist, and genre enthusiast based in Sydney, Australia.
Upcoming Picks (Click for streaming options)
-
JFK: A Masterpiece of American Myth-Making Hits 4K
Oliver Stone’s conspiracy epic receives a reverential UHD Collector’s Edition from Shout! Studios
When I first watched JFK at 15, I immediately thought it was the best-edited film in history.
Oliver Stone’s docu-drama tracks the investigation of New Orleans District Attorney Jim Garrison (Kevin Costner) into the existence of a conspiracy that led to the assassination of President John F. Kennedy; in doing so, Stone blends thousands of hours of interviews, archival footage, fastidious recreations, and decades of historical revelation and hindsight into a breathless three-and-a-half hours of gripping cinema. Garrison’s obsessive pursuit of the truth confronts him down countless dead ends and half-truths–and through his eyes, Stone directly interrogates and rejects a historical narrative perpetuated for decades.
While the obfuscation of who was behind the Kennedy Assassination becomes a point in and of itself during JFK’s lengthy runtime, the most remarkable quality of Stone’s film is how it forges a startlingly coherent narrative out of its vast, chaotically conflicting perspectives. Recreations and archival footage blend to color in the overarching narrative of Garrison’s investigation, teasing out the hidden truths behind the source elements we might take at face value. Similar to Oppenheimer and Zodiac’s later use of star power as cultural shorthand for its real-life characters, JFK employs a murderer’s row of stars and character actors to meticulously build its case for the impactful truths it hopes to reveal. With the help of everyone including Gary Oldman, Laurie Metcalf, Joe Pesci, John Candy, and both halves of The Odd Couple, Stone and Costner distill the overwhelming complexities of assassination conspiracy theories into a straightforward battle for justice and truth, deftly balancing its abilities to both inform and entertain the audience. The final sequence, essentially a 40-minute powerhouse of a monologue by Costner, is also the film’s bookending showcase of bravura editing–tying 200 minutes’ worth of frantic crosscutting into a singular emotional punch–one made all the more potent by Garrison’s failure to prosecute those he thinks had a key hand in Kennedy’s killing.
It’s a staggering conclusion that urges its audience to continue Garrison and Stone’s quest for truth. Admittedly, it was my first viewing of JFK that pushed me to visit Dealey Plaza for the first time, to stand behind the fence at the Grassy Knoll and feel like I was peering behind the veil of a pivotal point in American history. I partially credit JFK with inspiring my own investigative spirit, and for pushing me into researching some fascinating pieces of history and crime across my professional career–even including, in a full circle moment, a work shoot at Dealey Plaza itself.
In later viewings, I realized that the truly brilliant aspect of JFK and its editing lies in how the film’s relentless interrogation of the truth eventually encouraged me to subject Stone’s film to the same scrutiny it champions. It’s dangerous how convincingly Stone depicts the events of November 1963–crosscutting real footage of the assassination taken from various perspectives with an omniscient perspective featuring actors playing these real-life figures. By meticulously re-creating the assassination in Dealey Plaza to support the idea of multiple gunmen, on location no less, and cross-cutting it with authentic footage, Stone invites us to accept both on the same level of believability. The usage of pointed re-creation to fill in the gaps of reality infuses Stone’s fictional footage with the raw power of the evidence he’s employing, simultaneously providing a context to the real-life footage that now seems inseparable from Stone’s intended impact.
With this in mind, Stone’s depiction of Garrison’s investigation becomes as much of a theme park ride as it is an earnest pursuit of the truth behind the Kennedy Assassination. However thrilling the investigation may be, the construction of JFK as a narrative film is one that deliberately blends reality and fiction to force its audience to arrive at the conclusion Stone wants us to come to. At the same time, though, the deliberately contradictory staging of JFK’s flashbacks from multiple perspectives highlights just how limited Garrison’s–and Stone’s–perspectives really are, and the near futility of trying to come to an objective truth behind such a fractured yet impactful moment in time.
None of this is a slight against Stone’s film at all. In fact, revisiting JFK for Shout! Studios’ new 4K restoration reinforces my belief that JFK is truly the best-edited film of all time. It’s not just a film that does the near-impossible in synthesizing so many contradictory viewpoints into over three hours of engaging cinema–it’s a film equally fascinated with how the control of information forms our perspectives and beliefs from an early age. Beyond its technical brilliance, JFK compels its audience to question the film’s own position of authority and encourages them to conduct their own relentless investigations, fostering a sense of personal authority and awareness as a result.
This extensively put-together Collector’s Edition may be the most reverent home video treatment of Stone’s conspiracy epic, as it not only provides a vibrant remaster of the widely available 205-minute Director’s Cut but also utilizes the same remaster as a source for a presentation of the original 188-minute Theatrical Cut, which hasn’t been released on home video in the United States since 1992.
While some have expressed frustration with the fact that this cut isn’t also in 4K UHD, Stone himself has been candid on social media about the budgetary limitations preventing the restoration of both cuts–and that the director’s cut was chosen to give home audiences “more” with the longer cut in 4K. I’m partial to the Director’s Cut not just because it’s the only version I had access to growing up, but the sequences altered or excised from the longer cut results in what does feel like a more truncated experience. What’s more, in an age where any cut of a film may vanish without warning at the whim of the powers that be (studios, political forces, etc.), any attempt at preserving multiple cuts is something to be celebrated–especially if one cut has previously been unavailable for over thirty years.
Shout! Studios has also been diligent about collecting a wealth of special features for this release, porting over nearly all of the previous special features available on the previous 2001 DVD release and 2008 Blu-ray release by Warner Brothers. For completists, a previous 1992 feature-length documentary, “Beyond JFK: The Question of Conspiracy,” is absent from this release, along with other feature films and documentaries that were available on the 5-disc commemorative edition by Warner Brothers in 2013.
However, any missing special features are more than made up for with Shout’s newly-produced interviews on this set’s fourth disc, with nearly an hour’s worth of new discussions with JFK’s legendary primary creatives–including Stone, cinematographer Robert Richardson, and co-editor Hank Corwin. One particular interview I was fascinated by was with locations manager Patty Doherty Hess, who was responsible for securing and coordinating logistics for JFK’s on-location filming in Dealey Plaza, which was restored to 1963 period accuracy for over a week to re-create the Kennedy assassination from multiple perspectives.
In working with Oliver Stone to collect both cuts of JFK as well as an extensive assembly of new and archival special features, Shout! Studios has effectively preserved a work of American cinema that is no less controversial and essential as it was upon its original 1991 release, and this set deserves to be a cornerstone of any home video collection.
Video/Audio
Shout! Select presents the Director’s Cut and Theatrical Cut of JFK in a new remaster scanned from the original camera negative and presented in its original 2.39:1 aspect ratio. The Director’s Cut is presented in 2160p 4K on the UHD disc and in 1080p HD on the accompanying Blu-ray. The Theatrical Cut is only presented in 1080p HD on its own Blu-ray. A 5.1-channel surround track and original theatrical 2.0-channel stereo audio track are provided for both cuts, as well as SDH subtitles for the Deaf and Hard of Hearing for the feature.
JFK’s dizzying blend of archival, narrative, and re-creation utilizes multiple different film stocks and sources, inevitably posing a significant challenge when it comes to restoring the film as a whole. This new restoration rises to the occasion, retaining the filmic look of Robert Richardson’s cinematography (with occasional frame jitters on title cards and optical overlays) while pushing the clarity of each type of film stock used to their functional limits.
While presented in 2.39:1, the film shifts between many different aspect ratios–before expanding to its full ratio with Richardson’s narrative sections, much of the jaw-dropping opening montage pulling from 16mm Presidential addresses, stock footage, and other Kennedy archival is presented in a smaller ratio that emphasizes the window-boxing around the image; similar sequences throughout the film utilize this centered image approach, allowing for more natural presentation of the material, rather than blowing up the image to more immediate boundaries–thus drawing more attention to shifting aspect ratios.
The opening sections of the film feature a slightly blown-out “halo” to the lighting that gives way to more realistic, sharper tones as JFK progresses. Detail could easily be lost or mis-encoded in these opening sequences, yet textures like the wood grain of Garrison’s office or the smoky haze of the bar where Garrison and his associates watch initial news reports of the killing retain their specificity throughout varying levels of overexposure.
Colors are also significantly brighter and varied in this new presentation compared to the 2008 Blu-ray, reflecting the amount of revived detail in this new restoration. From the more tan/green-colored streets of French Quarter New Orleans to the prison uniform blues in the brown/green swamps of Angola prison, all colors have a comparative “pop” with this new HDR pass. Black and white sequences feature rich amounts of contrast, and any scratches or artifacts present reflect more artistic choices by Stone, Richardson, and company rather than unintentional mistakes or transfer limitations.
As far as the presented audio mixes, this Shout! set is notable for including the original stereo mixes for both cuts of the film, a mix that hasn’t previously been available on Blu-ray. However, the 5.1-channel surround track is the default for both cuts. Dialogue ranges from sharp to deliberately indistinct, depending on context. John William’s sweeping score, packed with drumlines, woodwinds, and funereal bagpipes, is well-distributed across all channels; however, there are moments when the score overpowers key lines of dialogue. Coupled with the staccato editing, it makes one grateful that SDH subtitles are also provided on both cuts.
Special Features
Disc One: Director’s Cut (4K UHD) / Disc Two: Director’s Cut (Blu-ray)
- Audio Commentary with Oliver Stone: An archival track from the 2001 DVD release with writer-director-producer Stone, delving into production logistics and other contextual information about the assassination alluded to by the film. It’s an incredibly intimate track, turning the film into a one-on-one with Stone as he guides you through both Garrison’s and his own beliefs on the machinations behind the assassination, as well as how Stone attempted to communicate them in a cinematically interesting way.
Disc Three: Theatrical Cut (Blu-ray)
- Audio Commentary with Oliver Stone: This is the same archival commentary track from 2001, edited to conform to the shorter theatrical cut.
Disc Four: Special Features (Blu-ray)
- One Person Can Make A Difference: a new interview with Oliver Stone, mainly focusing on what drew Stone to the material, the immediate impact of JFK and Stone’s subsequent testimony before Congress on the creation of the Assassination Records Review Board, and the lasting legacy of JFK on Stone’s career.
- Brave New Worlds: a new interview with editor Hank Corwin, who earned his debut credit as an editor working on JFK.
- Supporting the Vision: a new interview with co-producer Clayton Townsend, detailing his working relationship with Oliver Stone across multiple films.
- Re-Creating the Unthinkable: a new interview with SFX makeup artist Gordon J. Smith, who was responsible for the gruesome prosthetics employed on the actor playing President Kennedy in the assassination recreations at Dealey Plaza.
- Stone Bold: a new interview with cinematographer Robert Richardson, delving into the unique challenges, frustrations, and rewards of working on JFK alongside Stone and crew.
- The Delicate Hands of Time: a new interview with Dallas location manager Patty Doherty Hess, who had the unenviable position of securing the film’s real-life locations for JFK‘s production, as well as ensuring proper historical preservation protocols were followed during filming.
- Deleted/Extended Scenes: 12 deleted/extended scenes and an alternate ending totaling nearly an additional hour of runtime, with optional commentary by Oliver Stone.
- Assassination Updated: A half-hour archival documentary from JFK’s 2001 DVD release delving into the assassination documents declassified by the JFK Assassination Records Review Board in the 1990s.
- Meet Mr. X: The Personality and Thoughts of Fletcher Prouty: a 2001 featurette about the inspiration for Donald Sutherland’s composite CIA character, ported over from previous home video releases.
- Stills Gallery
- Trailer for JFK’s original theatrical release.
The JFK 4K UHD Collector’s Edition is now available from Shout! Studios.