-
KEOMA (1976) Blu-ray Screen Comparisons: Arrow Video vs Mill Creek’s 2012 Release
This article contains several comparisons which contrast Mill Creek Entertainment’s 2012 Blu-ray transfer with the new Arrow version. The frames aren’t necessarily exact matches, but should give a solid indication of the visual differences.
Arrow Video recently released Keoma on Blu-ray with a new restoration and special features. Directed by the great Enzo G. Castellari and starring Franco Nero (Django) and western legend Woody Strode, the 1976 film is a late-entry, old-fashioned spaghetti western treasure, trailing the heights of the genre’s popularity by a decade but staking a bold claim with legendary talent and a stylish and evocative approach culminating in a Christ allegory.
Keoma was previously released on Blu-ray in a double feature edition from Mill Creek Entertainment, sharing a single disc with The Grand Duel, plus trailers for both films. (Before being too critical of Mill Creek’s disc, fans should bear in mind that it was a budget release using available materials, and an excellent value, considering).
Like many aging Italian films, that older scan was a noisy, smeary affair with artificial smoothness and yellow bias. Arrow’s new edition is a definite and all-around improvement in every way, not only fixing those issues with color correction and a much cleaner 2K scan, but also fixing the print’s sometimes faded, desatured appearance and even opening up the image to fit a bit more of the frame on all sides.
Top: Old Mill Creek // Bottom: New Arrow Top: Old Mill Creek // Bottom: New Arrow Top: Old Mill Creek // Bottom: New Arrow Top: Old Mill Creek // Bottom: New Arrow Top: Old Mill Creek // Bottom: New Arrow Close-ups help accentuate these differences — note in particular the difference in clarity in the textures of skin and fabric and Woody Strode’s skin tone.
Top: Old Mill Creek // Bottom: New Arrow Top: Old Mill Creek // Bottom: New Arrow Top: Old Mill Creek // Bottom: New Arrow Top: Old Mill Creek // Bottom: New Arrow Like any great western, Keoma is full of vistas and landscapes, and it’s here that the old scan’s faded, desaturated colors are perhaps most evident. The restoration fixes those old gray scenes with clearer images of lush greens and blue skies.
Top: Old Mill Creek // Bottom: New Arrow Top: Old Mill Creek // Bottom: New Arrow Top: Old Mill Creek // Bottom: New Arrow
SPECIAL EDITION CONTENTS
More than just a new restoration, Arrow’s new edition boasts numerous features:
• New 2K restoration from the original 35mm camera negative
• Uncompressed mono 1.0 LPCM audio
• Original English and Italian soundtracks, titles and credits
• English subtitles for both soundtracks (with a new translation for the Italian track)
• New audio commentary by spaghetti western experts C. Courtney Joyner and Henry C. Parke
• The Ballad of Keoma, a new interview with the legendary star Franco Nero
• Ashes to Ashes, Dust to Dust, a new interview with director Enzo G. Castellari
• Writing Keoma, a new interview with actor and writer Luigi Montefiori AKA George Eastman
• Parallel Actions, a new interview with editor Gianfranco Amicucci
• The Flying Thug, a new interview with actor Massimo Vanni
• Play as an Actor, a new interview with actor Volfango Soldati
• Keoma and the Twilight of the Spaghetti Western, a newly filmed video appreciation by the academic Austin Fisher
• An Introduction to Keoma by Alex Cox, an archival featurette with the acclaimed director
• Original Italian and international theatrical trailers
• Gallery of original promotional images from the Mike Siegel Archive
• Reversible sleeve featuring original and newly commissioned artwork by Sean Phillips // booklet with new writing by Simon Abrams and Howard HughesA/V Out.
Get it at Amazon:
If you enjoy reading Cinapse, purchasing items through our affiliate links can tip us with a small commission at no additional cost to you.Except where noted, all 16:9 screen images in this review are direct captures from the disc(s) in question with no editing applied, but may have compression or resizing inherent to file formats and Medium’s image system. All package photography was taken by the reviewer.
-
SILENT HILL Screen Comparisons: Scream Factory Blows Away Sony’s 2006 Disc
One of the earliest horror films to hit Blu-ray gets a surprisingly revelatory upgrade
This article contains several comparisons which contrast Sony’s 2006 Blu-ray transfer with the new Scream Factory Collector’s Edition. The frames aren’t necessarily exact matches, but should give a solid indication of the visual differences.
Silent Hill was one of the earliest Blu-ray titles available, hitting soon after the format’s launch at a time when Sony’s discs were considered among the industry’s best in terms picture quality. Having watched this Blu-ray a couple times and being content with its appearance, I wasn’t expecting a big difference, if any, on a new release. I was wrong, because Scream Factory’s disc is a Silent Hill revelation.
With some transfers, there are a lot of varying factors and nuances to discuss, but with this comparison, it’s very straightforward. Scream Factory’s new presentation is sharper, brighter, and clearer. By comparison, the older disc almost looks like it’s got a milky haze that’s suddenly been cleared away — particularly noticeable in the now inkier blacks.
Though touted as director-approved, the new transfer isn’t advertised as being a new scan. Whatever the case may be, there’s clearly an improvement, and the difference in brightness and contrast (and I’m just guessing here, but seemingly an absence of artificial smoothing or DNR) provides far greater clarity.
Top: Old Sony // Bottom: New Scream Factory Top: Old Sony // Bottom: New Scream Factory Top: Old Sony // Bottom: New Scream Factory Top: Old Sony // Bottom: New Scream Factory Top: Old Sony // Bottom: New Scream Factory Top: Old Sony // Bottom: New Scream Factory Top: Old Sony // Bottom: New Scream Factory Close-ups
‘“A horror movie where I don’t get killed? No, I don’t need a script. I’m in.” Top: Old Sony // Bottom: New Scream Factory Top: Old Sony // Bottom: New Scream Factory Top: Old Sony // Bottom: New Scream Factory The only drawback to the newer, better transfer is that the darker, more muted picture of the prior disc helped to conceal or neutralize some of the dodgier effects and compositing. The film is very heavy on CGI not only for nightmarish creatures but also environmental effects, and in a harsher light some of it looks more garish and artificial.
There’s also an argument that could be made that the murkier transfer rings truer to the foggy, hazy aesthetic of the games, but I believe the inherent craft of the film carries this through where applicable, without the need for reliance on hazy video.
Top: Old Sony // Bottom: New Scream Factory Top: Old Sony // Bottom: New Scream Factory Top: Old Sony // Bottom: New Scream Factory
Besides a new transfer, Scream Factory’s Collector’s Edition also includes a second disc full of new features and interviews. Check out our Blu-ray review by Julian Singleton to read more!
Get it at Amazon:
If you enjoy reading Cinapse, purchasing items through our affiliate links can tip us with a small commission at no additional cost to you.Except where noted, all 16:9 screen images in this review are direct captures from the disc(s) in question with no editing applied, but may have compression or resizing inherent to file formats and Medium’s image system. All package photography was taken by the reviewer.
-
Two Cents Makes a New Best Friend with CHILD’S PLAY
Two Cents is an original column akin to a book club for films. The Cinapse team will program films and contribute our best, most insightful, or most creative thoughts on each film using a maximum of 200 words each. Guest writers and fan comments are encouraged, as are suggestions for future entries to the column. Join us as we share our two cents on films we love, films we are curious about, and films we believe merit some discussion.
The Pick:
Of all the long-running franchises to emerge from the slasher-glut of the post-Friday the 13th ’80s landscape, the Child’s Play series, starring Chucky the killer doll, may be the unlikeliest. Not only because “doll possessed by a serial killer” would seem to be a fairly limited premise, but because Child’s Play exists as a reaction to a very specific, very ’80s moment in pop culture.
The original script by Don Mancini was a fairly grim number, a jet-black satire of the growing corner of the toy industry including things like Cabbage Patch Kids, Teddy Ruxpin, and My Buddys, toys that blinked and moved and spoke. These toys weren’t designed to just be…you know…toys, but to act as friends, playmates, custodians, even surrogate parents, provided dear old mom and dad also spent the cash on all the auxiliary products that went with the dolls. Mancini’s script envisioned a doll built so realistically that it included fake blood. When young Andy Barclay mixes his own blood with the doll’s, it comes to life and begins to target and kill those people who have earned the child’s wrath.
The finished Child’s Play ended up being a good deal more playful (natch) once it passed through a number of other writers and director Tom Holland. Chucky (Brad Dourif) is a murderous creep who gets gunned down in a toy store by no-nonsense Detective Mike Norris (Chris “Humperdinck” Sarandon. Before he dies, Chucky uses a voodoo ritual to transfer his soul into a nearby doll, one of a popular line of ‘Good Guy’ toys. The doll ends up in the possession of hard-working single mother Karen Barclay, (Catherine Hicks) desperate for a gift for her 6-year old son Andy (Alex Vincent). No sooner has Chucky been let out of the box then he starts wreaking murderous havoc in Andy and Karen’s life.
Over 30 years later, the havoc hasn’t stopped. The Child’s Play films have continued, always with Mancini as a guiding hand as either writer, co-writer, and more recently director as well. The sequels pivoted to a more comedic bent before committing to being out-and-out absurdist comedies, climaxing (ha) in Seed of Chucky, in which Chucky spawns a gender non-conforming child, jerks off into a turkey baster, and kills both Britney Spears (played by an impersonator) and John Waters (played by John Waters). The franchise then pivoted back to horror, with Curse of Chucky and Cult of Chucky serving as stripped-down returns to the creepy, lo-fi aesthetics of the original. Despite this bizarre journey to absurdism and back, the Chucky films have maintained a single continuity for their duration, with Mancini as grand architect and Dourif’s maniacal voice work as the twin constants.
Due to a rights snafu, MGM retained creative control over the original Child’s Play (but not the Chucky sequels) and decided to launch a remake, despite the original series continuing in popularity. The remake, released last week, aged up Andy to a young teenager and swapped out the voodoo mythology in favor of making Chucky an AI unit run amok, replacing Dourif with Mark Hamill (the dude from The Guyver).
Some folks liked it, some folks didn’t, but regardless, Mancini, Dourif, and their creative partners are still moving forward with a TV continuation of their original series, with classic Chucky set to stalk SyFy channel sometime next year.
Here’s to 30 more years of Child’s Play.
Next Week’s Pick:
We don’t know if you know this, but there’s an international holiday called “Independence Day” next Thursday? No longer remembered as an American holiday, it was globally canonized in 1996. Anyway, we’re taking a break so you have two weeks to send us your thoughts on the amazing, the spectacular, the sensational, the ultimately Academy Award winning, Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse, now available to stream on Netflix!
Would you like to be a guest in next week’s Two Cents column? Simply watch and send your under-200-word review to twocents(at)cinapse.co anytime before midnight on Thursday, July 11!
Our Guests
Chris Chipman:
It’s easy to forget that the original Child’s Play is actually played pretty serious. Charles Lee Ray (played by Grima Wormtongue himself, Brad Dourif), who voodoo-maguffins himself into a Good Guy doll, is depicted as a crass, nasty, dangerous criminal and he continues in that vein as Chucky (also voiced by Dourif). The setup and pacing of the film are tight and the deaths and puppetry on Chucky still hold up. Not having seen this film since I was very young, I was also surprised at how much it still unnerved me.
Like clowns, the idea of a kid’s doll talking on its own or being possessed by some malevolent spirit is a common fear that seems to resonate well in horror films, particularly now with films like Annabelle and the Child’s Play reboot. I saw this film when I was very young, I would say between 6–8 years old, similar to the age of Andy in the first film. There was just a way about the score, cinematography and tone of this film that REALLY got to me as a kid. The fact that this doll was supposed to be Andy’s friend and not only betrayed him but tried to kill him really spoke to me and made me take a second look at my own toys. Also, that creepy voodoo knife with the weird zig-zag on it still creeps me out today.
As an adult with a child with an Autism Spectrum Diagnosis and seeing the way children who are seen as “different” are treated now and also thinking back to the way my own brother had been treated for being autistic and nonconforming in our early private school education, the scenes with Andy just being taken away from his mother and locked up in a creepy psychiatric hospital instead of being listened to really shook me. I thought back to my brother, being treated as if he was “bad” for being different and thought of Andy, who is both being betrayed by his “friend” Chucky and left for dead by the adults who should be protecting him. I then thought about my daughter, who is being treated with such empathy and affection by doctors, specialists, school and society today.
Because of both of these experiences, I am able to look Child’s Play as both a great example (that truly holds up) of this particular brand of horror movie and also a document of the archaic way mental health, especially in children used to be handled. Great to see that in my life-time things have gotten much better. Anyway… Child’s Play… it gets WAY sillier after the second one. (@TheChippa)
Child’s Play is one of those movies that terrified me long before I was old enough to actually see it. Just the premise, combined with VHS art, was enough to overstimulate my young imagination. Looking back, the Chucky/Child’s Play franchise is easily one of the most consistently good slasher series of all time — and with this first film it hit the ground running. The animatronics aren’t as polished as they would become in later sequels, but the ‘less is more’ approach (a la Jaws or Alien) is very effective. Of course Brad Dourif is perfect as Chucky, and Chris Sarandon is a lot of fun as the no-nonsense detective. But what really makes it work is Alex Vincent as Andy — his youth heightens virtually every bit of horror and suspense. I also love the way the film diverts into a weird voodoo revenge subplot, with Chucky hunting down the people who have wronged him. Child’s Play isn’t always my first choice when picking an old school slasher, but it definitely holds up. (The remake is surprisingly good too, albeit in some very different ways — but that is another story!). (@T_Lawson)
Today is Trey’s birthday so we want to give him a special shout!
Brendan Agnew (The Norman Nerd):
I dunno if this qualifies as a Hot Take or not, but I’m gonna go ahead and say that original Child’s Play is a better version of itself than the original Friday The 13th.
At least in how it creates a truly iconic horror personality and uses all the tricks in its tool chest to utmost effect. Don Mancini and Tom “Fright Night” Holland know exactly just how breezily to play the premise of “dead serial killer uses voodoo to possess a kid’s doll and then do more murders” while also crafting genuinely effective set pieces that play with the fun gimmicks afforded to “small scary thing in familiar settings.” There’s also the commendable way the cast play to the film’s strengths, and the focus on the precocious kid and harried mom being terrorized by Brad Dourif (who, predictably, owns) allows the filmmakers to dispense just enough information for the audience to understand the basics without overloading on lore or exposition.
I really can’t say enough good about how pacey and economical this thing is. Child’s Play spends exactly enough time on “Cabbage Patch Rear Window” before people other than the kid start to catch on, at which point Holland and Mancini load up every gag they can think of to put the cast through the wringer (poor Chris Sarandon damn near gets the Bruce Campbell treatment) and then just empty the clip to make sure that damn near every “wouldn’t it be cool if…?” moment gets a spotlight. Holland’s visual sensibilities are both adept at mitigating some dodgy Chucky doubles while also ratcheting up tension by holding shots with him in the background of the frame or accentuate his stillness so that final act can really go off.
Child’s Play leaves everything on the table, executing a “so crazy it just might work” premise with gusto and then literally burning through it, and however many times Chucky returns, his first outing still holds up as something special. (@BLCAgnew)
The Team
There are a couple elements that really make Child’s Play sing, above and beyond the standards of an agreeable ’80s creature feature. Number one is the design of Chucky himself. It’s nothing less than masterpiece, sitting perfectly at the intersection between ‘cute’ and ‘creepy’ so you understand why kids would desperately want the thing, while also ably building menace as it sits and watches hapless humans wandering around unawares of the danger that might spring out at any second. When Chucky comes to full life, the combination of puppetry, animatronics, and performers in costume, working with Dourif’s pre-recorded voice work, create a living, dangerous creature. The seams are visible, particularly whenever they just toss a kid or a dwarf in the costume and have them run around, but Holland is crafty enough in how he shoots and stages the Chucky scenes that it’s never a deal breaker.
But the real magic comes from Hicks and Vincent. The script does an exceptional job at illustrating their dynamic quickly and efficiently (none of Andy’s clothes really ‘fit’, a beautiful, uncommented on touch that highlights the economic straits the family is under) and both are among the most sympathetic victims in any horror film. Vincent, in particular, is almost too good, as the terror and trauma he expresses when Chucky turns is so convincing that Child’s Play, for the first and last time in this series, is at times genuinely upsetting. (@theTrueBrendanF)
Despite being a big horror fan who came of age in the ‘80s and ‘90s, I’ve never been one to hold the big franchises of that era as sacred cows. While I love most things A Nightmare on Elm Street, others like Halloween and Friday the 13 never meant much to me. Sadly, Child’s Play is included in this category. While I’ve always appreciated the original, I’ve never seen the sequels that I can recall and my appreciation of the original is mostly a shrug and a simple “I dig it.”
Rewatching the original film for the first time in roughly a decade or more, I feel more of the same. It’s a clever premise and a compelling story. Its brand of kindertrauma doesn’t scare as an adult the way it did as a kid, but it’s still very entertaining. While the latter films are mostly played for laughs, as far as I can tell, this film takes the premise rather seriously. And, despite enjoying a good horror-comedy, I appreciate this choice and think this film has aged quite well.(@thepaintedman)
As a kid, I had a vivid dream in which I thought I had seen my frog hand puppet (a real toy I owned) moving in my peripheral vision, so to expose him I abruptly acted as if I was going to bite his head, and he suddenly wiggled alive in my hand. When I awoke I told my sister about my dream and it distressed her so much that she didn’t want her own puppet anymore.
Similarly, I heard a playground urban legend about a Teddy Ruxpin that came to life in a child’s room at night — a quick Google search shows this telling was not an isolated phenomenon. Incidents like these are definite and irrefutable proof to me that Mancini, Holland, and company definitely tapped into something primal in children’s psyches when they created the Child’s Play concept.
Like Trey, this franchise was introduced to me at the video rental, many years before I actually viewed it. I loved perusing horror covers of movies I wasn’t allowed to watch. The first couple Child’s Play tapes were some of the most memorable images to an impressionable young mind (Chucky decapitating a Jack-O-Lantern!), and I picked up on the name “Chucky” before I knew Freddy or Jason.
As it happens, I didn’t watch Child’s Play until I was an adult, but even so it has some really effective moments of horror, in particular the moment where Catherine Hicks realizes something may actually be wrong with her child’s doll and puts it to the test by threatening violence — a scene which absolutely and immediately recalled when I did the same with my frog puppet.
As I was editing this article my 4-year-old caught a glimpse of Chucky and expressed her opinion that he looks creeeeeepy. Yes, friends, this will be a horror classic forever. (Austin Vashaw)
Next-next week’s pick:
-
THE HEAD HUNTER: Micro Budget Meets Medieval Horror Fantasy
More than just a calling card for a fantastic new filmmaking team
With somewhere around 100 words spoken in the entire duration of the film, and just about as many gallons of blood spilled, The Head Hunter is the truest form of lean and mean cinema.
A nameless warrior (Christopher Rygh credited only as “Father”) goes about his solitary business of monster killing as the camera watches on. We don’t actually see very many of these monsters, mind you, as the rumored budget of The Head Hunter is somewhere around $30,000. But we do see their remains. Trophies of monsters long vanquished adorn the walls of our warrior’s home. Alone and with a score to settle, Father occupies himself with the creation of potions that heal him and prepare him for the next battle. When a distant howl is heard, he will suit up and square off against the latest creature threatening the vaguely defined kingdom our protagonist lives on the outskirts of. There’s one creature in particular that he is after: the creature that took his daughter from him. Most of the words spoken in the film are Father to himself, or Father to his long-deceased daughter. It seems his only reason for living is vengeance against the monster who claimed his daughter’s life.
Few words, less dollars, and even fewer characters do not a slight movie make, however, if the filmmaking team is creative. And man… writer/director/editor Jordan Downey and writer/producer/DP Kevin Stewart sure do make the most of the resources they have. Probably most notably, for those skeptical of a film so shockingly inexpensive: The Head Hunter looks fantastic. Our solitary hero is clad in costuming that gives The Lord Of The Rings a run for its money. And the various creature designs and overall production value are laudable. While the world feels desolate and verging on apocalyptic, it also feels vast and expansive, with many sweeping vistas and environments explored. Most of the action takes place in and around Father’s home, but even his home is well designed and integral to the survival of this totally isolated man.
Are there limitations to what can be achieved with The Head Hunter? Sure. One notices when there are so few characters, or such little dialog. And you become aware of the distinct lack of screen time given to actual monsters whilst watching a movie about a monster hunter. The “Castaway Effect” might sour some viewers on The Head Hunter, as we really just watch one guy go about his lonely existence. None of those shortcomings diminished my own personal enjoyment or investment in the film, however. The smart script both creates a world which can be brought to life on a budget, and serves an actual function for a story about isolation and the futility of vengeance. The fact that it creates its own version of a world filled with horrible medieval magic and monsters will, I believe, draw in genre fans and engage them with a true medieval horror film with stakes and emotional weight.
And the final act really does go out of its way to create some true on screen action and monster thrills to compensate for the open space it leaves your brain to paint a visual picture of the action in the first two acts. I compare the feel of the early half of the film to the much-lauded video game Shadow Of The Colossus: an almost empty world, beautiful in its abandonment, and haunted by giant inexplicable creatures. As vengeance gets within tasting distance for Father, however, the tone becomes more claustrophobic and immediate. There’s even a bit of a Basket Case vibe to the final act, which I’ll leave at that.
I’m drawn to films like this with their own production mythology surrounding them. Oh, there’s a $30K fantasy film out there that’s actually awesome? I’m going to have to seek that out. So I was probably a mark for this all along. But The Head Hunter is more than just a calling card or a gimmick. It marks the genuine arrival of Jordan Downey and Kevin Stewart (not to mention their entire team who composed music and did production design and built gore effects, etc) as filmmakers to keep an eye on. And it also completely works as a narrative divorced from the knowledge of its humble origins. It’s gorgeous, it’s mean, it’s smart, and it pulls zero punches as a hard fantasy tale.
The Package
True to its scrappy origins, The Head Hunter is only available on DVD and VOD, so no high def physical media option is available. I’m personally thrilled to own this DVD and while The Head Hunter probably looks even more fantastic in high def, it still looks pretty stunning in standard. There aren’t any special features to speak of on this DVD release either, but the filmmaking team asserts that there are many behind the scenes materials that may someday get to see the light of day. Support this film with a DVD purchase or a VOD download, I say. If a grassroots fanbase emerges, we’ll likely get to see a lot more material on how they accomplished this feat, and perhaps they’ll get a chance to create something new for us as well.
And I’m Out.
The Head Hunter is now available on DVD and Digital directly from the official website.
-
SILENT HILL: Shout Factory Resurrects the Best Video Game Adaptation [Blu Review]
Shout Factory invites you to disappear into their new 2-Disc Special Edition
Christophe Gans’ film version of Konami’s Silent Hill franchise is a rarity when it comes to video game adaptations: it preserves the spirit and visual style of the original source material while attempting (to varied success) to translate hours’ worth of gameplay into a coherent, single-film story.
More than a decade since the film’s release — and eventual demise of the video game series — Shout Factory’s new Blu-ray does a fantastic job of positioning Silent Hill as a horror classic on its own terms. With a treasure trove of new and archival special features, Shout Factory recontextualizes Silent Hill as one of those rare examples of creative freedom given to a project that wasn’t just a big-budget adaption of a video game franchise, but a horror film that’s just as heavy on atmosphere as much as it is on grotesque shocks.
THE FILM
After little Sharon is plagued with nightmares fixated on her birthplace of Silent Hill, her adopted mother Rose decides to take Sharon to the long-abandoned West Virginia town in search of a cure. After a roadside accident causes Sharon to go missing outside of town, Rose must search the foggy streets of Silent Hill for her daughter and the answers to her mysterious past. But something else lurks in the darkness of Silent Hill — a nightmarish world of monsters and metal that’s out to claim Rose and Sharon for good.
Much like the video game series it’s based upon, Christophe Gans’ Silent Hill is an otherworldly blend of horror styles — from David Lynch’s dread-laden atmosphere to the body horror of David Cronenberg. Like a feverish hallucination, the rationale behind Silent Hill’s creatures and hellish setting is only explained so far — creating a frightening amount of unpredictability to a relatively straightforward story.
There’s much to love about Silent Hill on a purely visual level — while he realized his audience’s potential unfamiliarity with the material (only 150 copies of the game were released in his native France), Gans fiendishly dedicated himself to bringing the world of Silent Hill to life. Props, set designs, and even camera movements are directly lifted from what was already a heavily-cinematic video game, and the film’s soundtrack is more often than not a “greatest hits” of game composer Akira Yamaoka’s series-spanning work (with some delightfully demonic additions by co-composer Jeff Danna). While the end result may disorient audiences unused to the original series, and some moments bear the stilted dialogue and coincidental scenework of lesser video-game adaptations, Christophe Gans’ film remains an undeniably visceral and terrifying film, immersing the audience in a uniquely nightmarish world that runs on its own perverse dream logic.
It’s also clear that Gans does his best to create a practical world that his actors can react to, and as a result brings out some of their best work. Radha Mitchell and Laurie Holden are effective horror protagonists, screaming and shooting their way through setpiece after setpiece without losing sight of their characters’ emotional drive. Equal spotlight is given to some of my favorite character actors as well, from Kim Coates to Deborah Kara Unger, and even pre-Game of Thrones Sean Bean. The standout, though, is Alice Krige’s Christabella, who takes what could be a cartoonish villain and imbues her with a disturbingly evocative zealotry, a cult leader whose sole method of survival relies on the utmost dedication to their wicked beliefs.
THE TRANSFER
Shout Factory presents Silent Hill via an approved HD master working in collaboration with Director Christophe Gans. Contrast and black levels are sharp and the details of the film’s laborious production and creature designs are well-preserved. It’s revealed in the special features that the film was shot on both digital and film — a relative novelty back in 2006 — and the two styles blend remarkably well in this presentation.
Audio options include both DTS-HD Master 2.0 and 5.1 mixes. Akira Yamaoka and Jeff Danna’s score truly shines in these mixes, as well as a dynamic, hallucinatory sound design full of rusty metal and ambient echoes. Both tracks serve well to heighten the dread Gans and cinematographer Dan Laustsen’s visual style builds throughout. English SDH subtitles are also included for the feature, while the film’s special features go unsubtitled.
THE EXTRAS
Shout Factory has put together an impressive release, gathering almost five hours’ worth of special features. Included are new interviews with cast and crew as well as archival featurettes from US and international releases. It would have been nice to see interviews with stars Radha Mitchell, Alice Krige, or even Silent Hill’s iconic composer Akira Yamaoka. However, the talent involved here talk at length about the film’s rigorous production with an extensive amount of insight, making this release a significant upgrade from previous releases.
Packaging features a reversible slipcover of the film’s original theatrical poster and newly-designed art by illustrator Devon Whitehead featuring the film’s myriad nightmarish monsters.
DISC ONE
- Audio Commentary: Justin Beahm moderates a feature-length conversation with Silent Hill Cinematographer Dan Laustsen, delving into the challenges of adapting the visual style of the video games in a coherent cinematic fashion, easter eggs for eagle-eyed fans, and other technical aspects used to bring the chaotic world of Silent Hill to life.
- Theatrical Trailer: Silent Hill’s US trailer.
DISC TWO
- Interview with Director Christophe Gans: The Blu-ray’s most impressive highlight is this 3-part, 72-minute conversation with Silent Hill’s director Christophe Gans. Gans discusses how he got into horror filmmaking with Necronomicon, his first foray into Japanese-to-English adaptations with 1995’s Crying Freeman, and ultimately how his success with Brotherhood of the Wolf led into his pursuit of the Silent Hill film rights. Over a decade since the film’s release, Gans is refreshingly candid about his experiences fighting to retain the videogame’s nightmarish atmosphere and dream logic, as well as the film’s reception by fans both abroad and in his home country of France.
- A Tale Of Two Jodelles: Jodelle Ferland (Sharon), now an adult, reflects on her unconventional upbringing as a child actress and her memories working on a graphic horror film as a 10-year-old kid. Ferland shares fun anecdotes like sneaking into Radha Mitchell’s trailer to play the Silent Hill games in between takes, as well as surprising cosplayers who don’t recognize the grown-up actress at video game conventions.
- Dance of the Pyramid: Roberto Campanella discusses how he drew upon his career as a professional dancer in Rome to create the visceral movement styles of Silent Hill’s creatures, as well as his experience playing the Janitor and fan-favorite Pyramid Head.
- Interview with Paul Jones: In this two-part, 50-minute interview, special effects makeup designer Paul Jones discusses how his fascination with practical effects began as a kid with early rubber-monster movies. Jones continues into varied anecdotes from his long-storied film career, the complex and frequently frustrating makeup process involved in creating Silent Hill’s creatures, and what he learned and improved upon for the sequel, Silent Hill: Revelation.
- Path of Darkness — Making “Silent Hill:” This six-part in-depth look into Silent Hill’s production was sadly removed from the initial Sony Blu-ray release of the film, and has thankfully been restored for Shout Factory’s release. A few shots also provide tantalizing glimpses into the production of scenes eventually removed (and remain unseen) from the final cut.
- “On Set” and “Around the Film” Vintage Featurettes: Twenty minutes of featurettes are ported over from the equally-extensive French release of the film.
- Photo Gallery and Poster Gallery: Production stills and marketing materials from the film.
While both the film and video game series may have met their ends by the time of this review, Shout Factory’s new Blu-ray resurrects Silent Hill for a new generation of horror fans just in time for a well-deserved and overdue reappraisal.
-
ESCAPE PLAN: THE EXTRACTORS: More International Business Venture Than Movie
Some stars shine, but film fizzles
Having given Escape Plan 2: Hades a pretty gentle pass in my review, I find myself in the odd position of having to say that Escape Plan 3 isn’t a very good movie, but it’s substantially better than part 2… which hasn’t aged well in my memory.
It’s easy to see why the two films were shot back to back, as they’re both more of an investment exercise than a genuine film. I don’t say this as someone who’s unaware of the tropes of direct to video filmmaking. In fact, I’m a bit of a connoisseur of this type of cinema. The problem that often arises in this subgenre of lower budget direct to video films is when the motivation for making them feels more like an attempt to wring a few bucks out of an intellectual property that may have JUST a little life left in it. Sometimes you get an inspired filmmaker who attacks the project with something to prove and takes the limitations of the budget and wrings gold from it. Other times you get Escape Plan 2 and 3. Watching these movies is somewhat of an exercise in watching contractual negotiations play out on the small screen rather than watching a cohesive screenplay flow through three acts.
Here in The Extractors, Stallone’s Ray Breslin again plays somewhat of a supporting character in his own franchise. Most of the plot actually revolves around a dismissed security guard named Shen Lo (Max Zhang of Ip Man: Master Z fame) who seeks to redeem himself by rescuing his former charge and the love of his life, Chinese business mogul Daya (Melise). It just so happens that Daya has been kidnapped by the son of Breslin’s former business partner (Devon Sawa as Lester Clark, Jr), so therefore Ray and Shen’s heroic journeys are tied together in taking down the bad guy. Again, Breslin’s team shows up in the form of 50 Cent (given top billing on the cover with barely a few minutes of screen time), Jamie King (an unfortunately thankless role), and Dave Bautista (who gets to show up, kick ass, and walk away with nary a character trait in sight).
Max Zhang actually comes out of this film looking like the star that he proved himself to be in Master Z. And believe it or not longtime Stallone collaborator and director of this project John Herzfeld directs the martial arts sequences well, pulling back the camera and allowing Zhang to work his magic. There are a few standout moments that allow Zhang to make a more formidable leading man than the previous Breslin protege Asian character who was the lead in the second film. Devon Sawa also comes away from this film unscathed, absolutely making the most of a villain that should not have been very interesting. The movie ties in to the first one as Sawa’s character plays the son of Vincent D’Onofrio’s character in the first movie. Sawa is quite brutal, and The Extractors does earn its R-rating. Bautista gets a couple of gun battles that are the highlight of the show (but also in the trailer), and fights his own real-life stunt double at one point as well. Stallone doesn’t appear to be phoning this movie in, per se, but he really doesn’t feel like the lead at all either. He gets to dish out some sweet revenge on the bad guy, so I guess that’s something.
Unfortunately, in the end Escape Plan: The Extractors feels more like a collection of decent action beats and a showcase for a few actors while simply being a paycheck for a few others. It’s competent enough in comparison to its predecessor, and will probably play well on the international (and Redbox) market as it was designed to do. But one does miss the theatrical grade thrills of the first film, which I actually found to be a blast. Only the barest of essentials really tie these sequels to that Stallone/Schwarzenegger team up film that had some real style and fun to it. Only Stallone and Bautista completists or huge fans of Asian action cinema need pay The Extractors any heed.
And I’m Out.
Escape Plan: The Extractors is available on Blu-ray, DVD, and Digital on July 2nd from Lionsgate.
-
Two Cents Gets Struck by THE SEVENTH CURSE
Two Cents is an original column akin to a book club for films. The Cinapse team will program films and contribute our best, most insightful, or most creative thoughts on each film using a maximum of 200 words each. Guest writers and fan comments are encouraged, as are suggestions for future entries to the column. Join us as we share our two cents on films we love, films we are curious about, and films we believe merit some discussion.
The Pick:
Director Lam Ngai Kai earned himself eternal cult godhood with 1991’s Riki-Oh: The Story of Ricky, the Dead Alive of martial arts action films. Riki-Oh is a bloodbath beyond all measure, exploding skulls and shredding limbs at an astonishing rate. Every character in that film is essentially little more than an over-stuffed sausage one poke away from popping.
But Riki-Oh actually occurred at the tail-end of Kai’s career. He would make only one more film, 1992’s The Cat before dropping off the cinematic radar, concluding a long career with Golden Harvest (the same house that produced much of Jackie Chan’s output).
The gruesome goodness of Riki-Oh didn’t come out of nowhere. 1986’s The Seventh Curse combines a wide cross-section of genres, from Indiana Jones-style jungle adventure, to classically designed martial arts action, to rubber-suited monster mayhem, incorporating liberal doses of Kai’s trademark literally explosive gore.
Inspired by a pair of long-running fantasy/adventure series, The Seventh Curse stars Chin Siu-ho as Dr. Yuen Chen-hsieh, a fearless, globe-trotting doctor…who’s also kind of a cop, sometimes? Anyway, the good doctor spent some time in Thailand where he tried to rescue a beautiful native girl from being sacrificed to a carnivorous ancient god. He was rewarded for his efforts with a slow-acting curse that will, over the course of seven stages, ravage his body and leave him a bloody ruin.
In his quest to save his own life, Dr. Yuen is joined by the hyper-capable Wisely (Chow Yun-fat, the same year he first teamed with John Woo, in A Better Tomorrow), the fierce warrior Dragon (Dick Wei), and intrepid reporter Tsui Hung (future superstar Maggie Cheung). But can they defeat the evil cult’s power and stave off the monstrous, hungry gods? Or will each and every one of them be shredded down into chunky meat puddles?
Honestly, it’s anybody’s guess.
Next Week’s Pick:
Maybe you heard this, but Chucky is back. Voice by Luke Skywalker, even.
Technically, he never left. While his fellow icons of 80’s slasher-dom have gone through reboots, remakes, or been lost to extended periods of dormancy, Chucky the killer doll has chugged along steadily in a single continuity overseen by original film writer Don Mancini. Since their inception, the Chucky films have demonstrated a remarkable elasticity, covering a bizarrely wide range of styles and tones, anchored only by the twin constants of Mancini’s writing and Brad Dourif’s delightful malevolence as the voice of Chucky.
With the remake now upon us, we decided to go back to the beginning. Child’s Play was a surprise hit in 1988, perfectly poised to play off the nation’s obsession with the likes of the Cabbage Patch Kids and other dolls designed and promoted to serve as substitute friends for children.
Does Child’s Play hold up as the standard-bearer for a fright icon, or was this one due a new coat of paint?
Child’s Play is currently streaming on Amazon Prime.
Would you like to be a guest in next week’s Two Cents column? Simply watch and send your under-200-word review to twocents(at)cinapse.co anytime before midnight on Thursday!
Our Guests
Chris Chipman:
Surprisingly, I have never seen this one! The Story of Ricky (made famous by being awesome and also from a clip on The Daily Show in the Craig Kilborn days) is the more well known film from director Ngai Choi Lam.
My initial reaction is that The Seventh Curse is a movie that could be best described as a Peyote-infused mix between Temple of Doom and Big Trouble in Little China, with early Sam Raimi or Peter Jackson at the helm. The gore is over the top and the characters are broad caricatures that make little to no sense scene to scene but are still so enjoyable to watch wade through this world that you don’t really notice.
Unlike Tokyo Mighty Guy (which we discussed a couple weeks back), the main character here is actually a womanizing, abusive and problematic hero in the vein of James Bond or Indiana Jones, literally tying up a woman at one point to stop her from meddling. Chow Yun-Fat, playing a supporting role, turns out to be the more interesting and all around effective character against the evil they are facing.
Another really odd thing about the film is how much collateral damage there is. Our main character’s “silly romp” that lands him with a blood curse resulted in the death of everyone he was on expedition with. The villain is literally mashing local children to death for a spell and not only do they really not show much concern but there isn’t a scene where the children are freed. More and more people die as well while our hero tries to save just one girl.
Aside from all this weirdness and things that problematic to outright head scratching, The Seventh Curse is still a blast to watch in a weird, fever dream kind of way. (@TheChippa)
Brendan Agnew (The Norman Nerd):
Welp, I was always curious what cocaine would be like.
As will likely be a common refrain, The Seventh Curse defies explanation — but I’m gonna give it a shot anyway. Even leaving aside the fact that the film assumes at least a base level of familiarity with the “Wisely” and “Doctor Yuen” pulp adventure books (think Tony Stark and Stephen Strange, except with less armor, astral projection, and dramatic wardrobe and more witchcraft, kung fu and guns), Seventh Curse pinballs through a gauntlet of narrative conceits and genre mashups that practically dare you to keep up before throwing the next flashback or human sacrifice or possession or shootout or magic quest or hostage crises (seriously, there’s at least 4 of those) or giant monster at the viewer.
And. It. Fucking. RULES.
Call me a cat chasing a laser pointer if you want, but the unbridled glee with which Lam Nai-Choi throws his cast down the hill of this movie to see what crazy shit they can pick up along the way had me almost immediately. And if it hadn’t, you can bet that the “let them fight” finale would have endeared it to me all in on its own. Chui Sau-Lai (as Yuen) has agreeable comedic chemistry with an under-used Maggie Cheung, and Chow Yun-Fat steals the whole damn movie out from even the awesome skeleton puppets and gory creature effects. And he’s only in the film for about 10 minutes!
The Seventh Curse is a very particular groove, but it finds it nimbly and hits the gas through every crazy curve, so if that sounds like your bag –
You know what, seek this movie out even if it doesn’t. Chow Yun-Fat fighting monsters with magic and military hardware is always worth your time. (@BLCAgnew)
I’m not really sure what I just watched. I feel like there is something about The Seventh Curse that must be getting lost in translation. There are elements of both character and exposition, especially in the first act, which just didn’t add up for me as a first-time viewer. Also — although I would count this as a plus — the film seems to change genre every few minutes. At various times it features aspects of cop movies, Indiana Jones-style adventures, and horror films (among others). Also in the film’s favor are a young Chow Yun-Fat in a key supporting role, Elvis Tsui as a very weird and creepy sorcerer, and some gnarly Alien-inspired practical effects. Not everything the movie tries works, and some of it admittedly hasn’t aged well. That said, it is certainly an ambitious production. I didn’t always get what was happening (or why) in The Seventh Curse, but at no point was I ever bored. (@T_Lawson)
The Team
With a lot of B-grade, cultish films, you have to go in knowing that the crazy/surreal/nonsensical/gross/fun parts of the film that have enshrined it into memories and hearts of trash fans represent only a tiny fraction of the runtime (these moments tend to get emblazoned all over the poster, further cementing them in the minds of fans). Hell, the whole point of Grindhouse was to make a film in that vein that ‘lived up to’ the poster.
Well, here is a film that is nothing but those moments of inspired insanity strung together for 80 minutes. That could be tiresome, but because The Seventh Curse is constantly changing up genres and tones and finding new heights of low-budget grotesque to fling at you, it never gets old.
As with The Story of Ricky, there’s a casual disregard for human life that gets me giddy. Every single group that our ‘hero’ Dr. Yuen Chen-hsieh leads into the jungle gets reduced into chunky soup by all manner of mad deathtrap, and the climax of the film finds our assembled protagonists standing around and watching while a long line of children are fed into a stone stomping machine turning them into bubbling red soup. It’s trash that gleefully lives up to everything you want your trash to be. (@theTrueBrendanF)
The Seventh Curse recently showed up on Amazon Prime, and as a fan of Chow Yun Fat I immediately put it in my queue. But credit goes to a recent episode of Shock Waves podcast for truly putting it on our radar.
The Seventh Curse is just as nutty and frenetic as promised, a genre-crossing exploitation fever dream of creature horror and pulp adventure. There’s a fine line to ride when it comes to tastelessness and grotesquery, but for whatever reason this one somehow manages to get away with it. Maybe it’s the go-for-broke aesthetic of constant craziness and gleeful abandon with which teams of explorers get eviscerated by jungle traps, children are pulped into mush by great stone slabs, and ancient evil takes the form of Henelotteresque monsters. (Austin Vashaw)
Next week’s pick:
-
MIDSOMMAR is a Terrifying Dose of Sun-Dappled Dread
A brilliant Florence Pugh survives breakups and Scandinavian pagans in Ari Aster’s second feature
In many ways, Midsommar feels like a twin to writer-director Ari Aster’s last film, Hereditary. Both films tackle raw themes of grief and emotional guilt, and Aster divines horror from his characters’ internal turmoil as much as he does from the external terrors lurking around them. Midsommar, though, trades the looming darkness of Hereditary for blinding sunlight — and likewise trades the former film’s claustrophobic, emotionally-withdrawn family ties for a villainous village whose defining virtue is unnerving honesty and empathy.
With no shadows to hide his scares, it’s astounding that Aster manages to make Midsommar as visceral of an experience as Hereditary — at times, even more so than his last film. Aster delights in putting Midsommar’s horrific sights on full display, treating them with a banality that’s as striking as it is familiar. As a result, the sun-lit insanity elevates over two-and-a-half hours to incendiary heights. With Midsommar, Ari Aster expands upon the themes of Hereditary to create a beautiful descent into madness rich with surprising emotional maturity.
In the wake of unimaginable loss, Dani (Florence Pugh) fights to keep her floundering relationship with boyfriend Christian (Jack Reynor) alive; Dani’s grief, however, obligingly binds Christian to Dani just as he seeks a much-dreaded breakup with her. When Dani finds out about his upcoming plans to visit Sweden, Christian impulsively invites her along, hoping to somehow resolve things along the way. Joining Dani and Christian are party boy Josh (Will Poulter) and wide-eyed bookworm Mark (William Jackson Harper), who steer clear of Dani and Christian’s drama by indulging in the historical and sensual pleasures of the Swedish countryside. Their guide, exchange student Pelle (Vilhelm Blomgren), leads the group to their destination–a Midsommar festival in Pelle’s village of Hälsingland. The village’s beauty, however, hides deadly secrets — and as the festivities rage on, everyone comes to realize just what role they’re meant to play in the villagers’ ancient rites.
Midsommar’s premise may feel familiar to fans of folk horror films like The Wicker Man and Kill List, even Hostel — but as in Hereditary, Aster possesses an intuitive knack for recognizing and subverting his audience’s expectations. Rather than dive immediately into the horrors we’re all anticipating, Aster draws out his film’s first half with scenes that wallow in the repressed emotions of his characters. Pugh and Reynor excel at bringing Dani and Christian’s dying relationship to life — they step on each other’s words and nail the small physical micro-aggressions that come with constantly second-guessing themselves and their partners. In an opening phone call, Dani fails to get Christian to reassure her about a family crisis, fighting back tears as much as she tries to keep things light and airy. It’s an incredible display of Florence Pugh’s range as an actress, which is grippingly explored in painful depth over Midsommar’s runtime.
Aster’s equally dedicated to investing us in the world of Midsommar’s Hälsingland, capturing the breathtaking detail of Henrik Svensson and Andrea Flesch’s impressive art direction and costume design. From the film’s opening medieval tapestry, to the walls of the village’s communal sleeping quarters, to the wildflower-festooned garb of the May Queen, Midsommar’s pastoral setting feels authentic and lived in — a technique that instills a sense of unending touristic curiosity in the audience.
The welcoming openness of the Hårgas villagers proves equally seductive for each of the characters in myriad ways. Mark, who’s writing a thesis on midsummer rituals, is excited to be the first to document their way of life. Josh, ever the stereotypical American frat boy, chases every opportunity to get laid. For Dani and Christian, however, the Hårgas’ emotional availability reminds them at each turn of the honesty their relationship desperately lacks. As a result, a wedge is further driven between the couple as their group gets increasingly drawn into the village’s bizarre Midsommar ceremonies. Rather than an outright horror film, Midsommar instead positions itself as a film about the horrors of empathy. With the emotional tension constantly ratcheting up between his central couple (to the hilarious exasperation of their friends), Aster’s film feels like a horror movie long before anything horrific even happens.
And, boy, does it happen.
In many respects, Midsommar ups the gory ante compared to Hereditary. There’s just as much love for gruesome practical effects, and I’m all for Aster’s continued exploration into just how many ways he can inflict trauma to people’s heads. But like Hereditary, Aster isn’t content with what’s “expected” to be horrific; nor does it contain the usual scares that one would expect from folk horror. Instead, most of Midsommar’s dread and anxiety comes from the sheer banality of its evil. The protagonists act as a sounding board for much of the film’s shocking sights, which play effectively against how much the Hårgas welcome and accept them. The horror here feels so achingly normal, with mutilations and brutalizations treated as much of an anthropological curiosity as everything depicted in Midsommar’s first half, reminiscent of recent period “non-horror” horror movies like Silence or Hagazussa: A Heathen’s Curse.
Aster also externalizes his characters’ inner anxieties through clever, subtle uses of VFX as different ingested psychotropics take hold of them. Trees breathe, flowers undulate and contract, and eyes change colors in sequences that increasingly blur the line between nightmare and reality. It’s a technique that burrows deep under one’s skin, and the film’s lengthy runtime only serves to delightfully prolong the suffering of both Aster’s characters and audience.
Unfortunately, there are points where Midsommar feels just as twinned with Hereditary’s faults as it is with its successes. While much of the film’s first half is beautifully shot and revels in the tensions it creates between the characters, I couldn’t help but feel like the film’s few subplots were more obligatory than necessary. A thread about Christian and Mark’s academic rivalry is cut short before we’re fully invested in it, and Josh’s attempts to take advantage of Hårga women feels a bit too telegraphed to be either scary or funny. Another storyline involving a British couple that parallels Dani and Christian is also (understandably) underdeveloped — one can’t help but feel like they’re just more bodies to be added to the pile. Each of these subplots give the sense that while Aster delights in building up suspense, he can’t deny he shares his audience’s impatience to get to where Midsommar is inevitably headed. What’s more, this constant knowledge that things will eventually go sour sometimes bleeds Midsommar of the subversion that made Hereditary so terrifyingly unpredictable.
And while I’ve tried to keep this review relatively spoiler-free, there is a character in Midsommar (shown in the film’s marketing materials) that feels like a major misstep on Aster’s part. It’s understandable why Midsommar would use a character trope like Ruben — similar characters appear in films like Deliverance or Texas Chainsaw Massacre, and provide an easy (if ethically dubious) visual shock. But using a developmentally-disabled character as one of the sources of Midsommar’s horror feels almost antithetical, if not a betrayal, to the kind of anxiety and dread Aster sets up and employs through the rest of the film.
What’s most effective and terrifying about the Hårgas is how rational and well-thought-out their world is, that their traditions feel as rooted in logic as they are in unshakable faith. Including a character like Ruben doesn’t just feel like a throwback to now-questionable ideas of what audiences may find horrifying, it also robs Midsommar of how refreshingly normal and banal the Hårgas’ evil actions feel. There comes a much more evocative moment of how fallible the Hårgas’ beliefs might be in the film’s climax, one that doesn’t require Ruben at all to effectively communicate Aster’s ideas. It’s understandable that the audience needs to be repulsed by the Hårgas’ beliefs — but it’s reductive and unnecessary for that to be at the cost of further otherizing people with different physical/mental abilities.
Make no mistake, though — in spite of its shortcomings, Midsommar is a deliriously good movie, one whose journey is hilarious and harrowing in equal measure. A riveting scene finds Dani screaming with a throng of Hårga women, their cries eventually mirroring and matching each other in an electrifyingly cathartic bond. It’s one of Midsommar’s rare moments of connection and intimacy, one that best exemplifies how seductive belief can be in times of crisis, and the emotional and physical tolls we’re willing to take in order to feel like we belong — be it to our ancestors, our loved ones, or our gods. As its characters either succumb to or wholeheartedly accept the insanity that erupts by the film’s climax, Midsommar reveals itself as a film that recognizes that horror exists along a wholly diverse spectrum — and dares us to confront that it may only take nine days (or two-and-a-half hours) to embrace the same horrors we initially rejected.
Midsommar opens in theaters July 3, 2019.
-
Catching Up with the Classics: CLOSE-UP (1990)
Truth is stranger than fiction in Abbas Kiarostami’s hybrid documentary
Film 53 of 115: CLOSE-UP (1990)
Close-Up follows the trial of Hossein Sabzian, who’s charged with fraud after posing as famed Iranian director Mohsen Makhmalbaf in order to gain the trust of a middle-class Tehran family, the Ahankhahs. His motivations remain somewhat mysterious, and even though an exchange of money took place and the Ahankhahs raise suspicions of a future robbery, it’s difficult to say what crime Sabzian’s actually committed. One thing is clear, though — the Ahankhahs fell for Sabzian’s ruse, and Sabzian remained equally committed to keeping up the lie. The film intercuts between Sabzian’s trial, interviews with accusers and the accused, and re-enactments of Sabzian’s deception — with everyone involved playing themselves. What initially begins as an examination of one man’s curious charade becomes a rumination on the impact of art on society and the near-impossibility of filming objective truth.
I feel like there’s a certain mental gear-changing that happens when watching documentaries versus narrative films. In fiction, we can accept nearly any situation or plot development, no matter how absurd— since what we’re watching isn’t real, there’s a certain acceptance that, theoretically, anything is possible as long as it feels organic to the world created for the story. But with documentaries, there’s the unspoken agreement and expectation that what we’re being shown is true. In accepting that the people and stories in front of us are real, we expect that the person filming them is assuming the same role we are — passive observers of some subject whose life will play out un-manipulated. Suspension of disbelief feels like a given in fiction — but once one starts to doubt what’s happening in a documentary, the whole experience feels poisoned.
Close-Up rarely allows us to change gears. Through a series of revelatory yet unobtrusive cinematic flourishes, Kiarostami encourages us to doubt which mode of storytelling we’re even in from scene to scene. The film’s beginning, which follows a journalist on his way to witness Sabzian’s arrest, feels like a ride-along out of Cops…until he arrives at the arrest. The film suddenly cuts to reaction shots of his taxi driver waiting outside, comically busying himself with the litter around him; this never was a documentary, but a staged re-enactment. Sabzian’s trial (cheekily postponed to accommodate Close-Up’s shooting schedule) is also “staged,” with witnesses directed to look towards one of two cameras so Kiarostami can capture their testimonies more effectively. In my favorite moment of the film, a typical interview setup of master-shot and intercutting close-ups is revealed, in one sudden tracking shot, to also be a re-enactment parroting an earlier interview’s shooting style. In pulling out the rug from under us so often, Kiarostami urges not to let us get too complacent — to not take any character, even the director himself, at their word. In Close-Up, no one perspective is an objective truth.
So, what’s an audience to do then, if Close-Up lacks the omniscience of a documentary but also refuses to let any single character be the Virgil to our Dante? To Kiarostami, it’s simple: instead of getting to a simple truth to the strange mystery of Sabzian and the Ahankhahs, Kiarostami invites us to become as part of the story as much as he did as a director.
It’s a reoccurring sentiment expressed in the other two Kiarostami films I’ve seen. Certified Copy’s two leads continuously provoke their viewers into questioning the nature of their enigmatic relationship; at one moment, a wink in a mirror feels like a sudden acknowledgement of our invisible presence. Shirin, on the other hand, paints a retelling of a classic Iranian folktale in the imagination of the viewer by focusing on the reactions of another audience entirely: a legion of Iran’s most famous actresses (and Juliette Binoche), watching an unseen film play out in front of them. The story they watch doesn’t just feel like like it’s taking place behind us — sometimes it’s more like these “fictional” women are reacting to our reactions.
Kiarostami’s films feel endlessly aware that we’re watching them — and in so doing force us to question not just how, but why we’re doing so. And by forcing me to endlessly engage with the nature of what I was watching, Close-Up led me down a path of reckoning both with my expectations and my responsibilities as a viewer. Because it refused to be so passively viewed like other films or documentaries, Close-Up was a rigorous and ultimately rewarding experience that, in turn, made me feel much more connected to its story than other films.
It’s also by similarly connecting to Makhmalbaf’s movies that Sabzian rationalizes posing as the director himself. Makhmalbaf’s films put a voice to Sabzian’s suffering, clarified it, and relieved him of it in an experience worth repeating over and over again. Like any cinemagoer, Sabzian found an escape in film — and, oddly enough, it’s by making the impulsive lie to Mrs. Ahankhah that he is Makhmalbaf that Sabzian’s given a real-world opportunity to escape his troubling life. Sabzian’s both seduced and repelled by the sudden power he possesses — “Before, no one would have ever obeyed me like that, because I am just a poor man. But because I pretended to be this famous person, they would do whatever I said.” Nevertheless, Sabzian recognizes the inevitability of returning to his real life — no matter what he does as Makhmalbaf, when he goes home, he goes home as himself. It’s a strange ouroboric compulsion Sabzian plays out — the more he retreats into his Makhmalbaf persona, the greater chance he risks in exposing himself, which only pushes him to do indulge in it even more. In Close-Up, cinema and the escape it provides feels like a powerful drug — something that Kiarostami, his subjects, and the audience feel all too aware of as this fiction-reality plays out. Naturally, the film depicting this struggle feels just as endlessly reflexive — and, in a delightfully ironic fashion, finds its solutions in the cathartic feelings that film provides.
In a way, Close-Up is the ultimate restorative justice exercise, forcing victim and perpetrator to re-enact a crime in order to bring about forgiveness and resolution. There’s a unique tension in the scenes when Sabzian works his magic on the Ahankhahs all over again — as if all parties can’t believe how they fell for each other after the fact, but are also rediscovering how they did so in the first place. At the same time, everyone — including Kiarostami the director and us as a viewer — reckons with themselves as an individual, fictional character, actor, and audience member all at once. By the end, everyone’s not just conscious of their individual actions and desires, but also of how they affect and are affected by the actions and desires of those around them.
Great films use the induced empathy of an audience for their characters to bring about a mirrored catharsis — as a character endures suffering and experiences change, hopefully so will we. And by using the cathartic nature of fictional narrative filmmaking, Close-Up hopes to bring about an equally euphoric and pacifying resolution between Sabzian and the Ahankhahs.
Close-Up is a film that celebrates the bond that cinema creates between people who would normally struggle to find common ground. It’s a film by a director — gone too soon — who unabashedly believed that showing an audience how a magic trick worked helped deepen their appreciation of it. And, ultimately, Close-Up is an impressive meditation on how life imitating art eventually becomes it.