-
SHAWSCOPE VOL. 1: THE MIGHTY PEKING MAN Cinapse Roundtable Reviews
The team & guests cover Shaw Brothers classics from Arrow Video’s Blu-ray box set!
Cinapse has always been, and will always be, about cinematic discovery and discussion. Our Shawscope Volume One: Round Table Reviews column is, therefore, a watch project allowing our team, and guests, to work our way through this phenomenal 12 film Blu-ray box set from Arrow Video. These capsule reviews from a variety of writers are designed to give quick glimpses of our thoughts on all of these films as we discover them for ourselves. Some of us are experts and some of us are new to the world of Shaw Brothers studio and kung fu cinema in general. All of us are excited for the adventure.
The Hong Kong-based Shaw Brothers Studio cranked out a staggering number of feature films over its lifetime. With worldwide influence continuing to this very day, their contributions to cinema are myriad and undeniable. But with the vast output they generated, it can be hard for modern audiences to wade into their catalogue and find the diamonds in the rough. Fortunately, Arrow Video has curated their first Volume of 12 titles; a phenomenal way to wade into the deep waters of the Shaw Brothers. Beyond just capsule reviews, our team will also offer thoughts on the curation of the set and bonus features found within. Watch along with us, join us in the comments, or reach out to us on social media (linked below) if you’d like to submit your own contributions!
Ed Travis:
As much as I adore kung fu movies, I was very excited to check out The Mighty Peking Man as a bit of a break from the four films we’ve explored thus far in the Shawscope Volume 1 box set. A sort of exploitative and sexed up kaiju/King Kong knock off, The Mighty Peking Man is most definitely a departure from the grace, nobility, and foibles of martial heroes.
Unfortunately for me, it wasn’t a particularly positive departure. Look, I enjoy just about every King Kong I’ve ever seen, from the original on up to the bombastic Godzilla Vs. Kong. But it’s the heart and character work and yes, even sometimes the spectacle, that really get my heart racing in giant monster movies. It isn’t really a guy in a suit crushing miniatures. And I have to be honest that while I appreciate lots of kaiju properties, they’re not always my favorite to actually watch.
There’s no denying the occasional titillation at the gorgeous Evelyne Kraft and her seedily scant wardrobe, or the wildly unsafe filming with live animals, or the hilarious slow motion montages set to sappy love music. Entertainment was achieved. But even for its time this wasn’t executed with particularly effective special effects, and the cheapness and blatant knock-off quality didn’t help me get engaged in the flimsy story being told. I ultimately felt this was empty spectacle bolstered by some memorable exploitative elements. — Ed Travis
Austin Vashaw:
Some context may be required to appreciate Mighty Peking Man as a movie for its time. 1976 brought Dino De Laurentiis and John Guillermin’s modernized, awkwardly horny (and thoroughly enjoyable) remake of King Kong, featuring Jessica Lange in skimpy animal skins and Jeff Bridges as a hunky environmentalist who finds himself contending with unexpectedly hairy competition in an unusual love triangle. The film was a massive hit, and knockoffs/parodies including South Korea’s Ape and Europe’s Queen Kong soon followed.
Shaw Studios joined the party with Mighty Peking Man, even further emphasizing the sexy shenanigans with a radiant Evelyne Kraft barely contained by an animal skin bikini, and handsome superstar Danny Lee as the male lead.
The film’s a blast, sometimes genuinely great and sometimes enjoyably campy. The jungle-set part of the adventure is full of wild (and perilous looking) animal stunts, and it’s an interesting twist that the “Kong” relationship leans more paternal than romantic. Like the ‘76 Kong, corporate greed is the villain, embodied by a smarmy idiot who gets his comeuppance when the action moves back to modern society – in this case, Hong Kong.
Like many among the film’s US audience, I was introduced to it by its home video release under Quentin Tarantino’s Rolling Thunder banner, and it’s in that spirit, as a fan of exploitation cinema, that I can best appreciate it. Mighty Peking Man isn’t a good movie by any critical metric, but it’s a thoroughly entertaining one. — Austin Vashaw
Brendan Agnew:
While The Mighty Peking Man is not nearly as strong an example of its genre as most of the rest of the films in this set are of theirs, I found a lot here to like. Beyond the admirably energetic cheese and exploitation (to say nothing of the very solid suit and model work during rampages), there are enough genuinely interesting story choices to justify King Kong With The Serial Numbers Filed Off. The choice to lean into the “Beauty and the Beast” elements with the female lead being a willing companion rather than captive gets played out with surprisingly strong thematic results, and Evelyne Kraft is ludicrously game for what the film asks of her.
Not everything works – Danny Lee isn’t given much interesting to do as the male romantic lead, aspects that were already distasteful at the time have aged like warm milk, and a lot of Act 2 is just slow and meandering. But I love that it’s a full-on 1930s Tarzan movie for the first 20 minutes, I adore that monkey suit, and that last set piece cooks better than anything in the 1976 big budget Kong remake. It’s a far softer recommend than other films in the set, but is easily a worthwhile curiosity for fans of the genre. — Brendan Agnew
Justin Harlan:
My Shaw Brothers experience is mostly Kung Fu, but there have been a few other films from the studio that I’ve been able to check out over the past few years. And, in fitting with my experiences of those films, I have to admit… I prefer Shaw films when they remain in the martial arts realm. Whether an intentional comedy without the action of the Kung Fu classic, a horror film, or – in this case – a kaiju flick, nothing outside of their classic Kung Fu has done much for me.
This particular joint felt mostly like a King Kong ripoff, with elements from other kaiju films, Tarzan, and George of the Jungle thrown in for good measure. Admittedly, King Kong films are a bit of blind spot for me to begin with – due mostly to never feeling extremely interested in watching them – but I am familiar enough with the main tropes and themes. Thus, seeing familiar tropes of a film series I’m not horribly interested in, worse production values than other films in this subgenre, and a generally weak plot, I was not too impressed.
I’m still open to giving more non Kung Fu films in the Shaw library a chance, but this one didn’t do any favors for the cause. In short, it just wasn’t really for me. — Justin Harlan
And We’re Out.
Shawscope Volume 1 is now available on Blu-ray from Arrow Video
Further Reading:
https://cinapse.co/shawscope-vol-1-the-boxer-from-shantung-cinapse-roundtable-reviews-f236ec2170echttps://cinapse.co/shawscope-vol-1-the-boxer-from-shantung-cinapse-roundtable-reviews-f236ec2170echttps://cinapse.co/shawscope-vol-1-the-boxer-from-shantung-cinapse-roundtable-reviews-f236ec2170ec
-
SXSW 2022: MILLIE LIES LOW Reaches Comedy Heights
The debut feature from Michelle Savill is a star vehicle for Ana Scotney.
Millie (Ana Scotney) stealing WiFi to get by. When Millie (Ana Scotney) gets a fancy internship at a fancy New York architecture firm, she becomes the envy of her friends, school, and community. She gets featured in commercials and brochures for her school, her hair straightened out to something almost unrecognizable. She gets a spot on the local news as her best friend and rival, Carolyn (Jillian Nguyen), tries to reassess her own architecture work, which she believes Millie has copied. And she gets plastered on a huge billboard in the Wellington airport — where she’s secretly hiding out after forcing her way off her flight, panic-stricken and out thousands as she begins to craft an Instagram-worthy image of her new life in New York.
A lie spinning out of control is a solid comedy premise: The more Millie lies, the more she must continue lying to maintain her situation, concocting scenarios that start off clever and grow increasingly concerning. After editing herself into generic photos of Times Squares, Millie spends her dwindling dollars on bags of flour so she can roll around on gravel and create faux snow angels. Her posts seem to work on her peers, including Carolyn; one shot of Millie smiling, her face lit up only by her phone’s notifications of likes rolling in, is a delight both of lighting design and of character insight. As the film goes on and Millie runs out of places to hide, her actions grow more and more confusing: Why would she steal a camping tent from her parents’ backyard shed and hide in the woods rather than in the shed? Why would she sneak back into Carolyn’s house after a party she’d attended in a Daft Punk-like disguise? Millie isn’t some sociopath intent on deceiving her friends for the sake of it — she screwed up and she’s embarrassed. She avoids moving forward only because she can’t turn back time and stay on the plane. In the most ridiculous and untenable situation, Millie becomes a highly relatable protagonist.
Scotney carries the film, which played Berlinale last month before heading to SXSW, as a woman in self-imposed isolation, navigating anxiety, lackluster romance, and the crushing weight of unfulfilled expectations in a 100-minute sojourn. She revels in a sense of self-destruction that begets more bad decisions as if she is compelled by some outside force. “Sorry I’m such a disappointment,” she admits to her mother after she’s caught by the Airbnb guest staying at her family’s home. “We can’t all be appointments,” her mother says in returns, forcing Millie to listen to a tale of her father’s mental health struggles and how he ignored them for too long. Millie appears more upset by the panic attack she insists she didn’t have than by her elaborate schemes after the fact; whether this mental health stigma comes from her life and society in New Zealand or her family and culture, it’s deeply ingrained within her.
Less ingrained and less developed, however, is a plot involving Millie’s professor (Sam Cotton), a man projecting his premature mid-life crisis onto Millie’s romantic advances by having her role play as the wife who’s left him. The sequence comes toward the end of the film after the two have already had a previous awkward encounter, and feels out of place, like it was added to increase the run-time as Millie inched closer to the resolution of her problems. That resolution comes with a wakeup call on her most important relationships, including with her witless but determined boyfriend (Chris Alosio) and the family she’s tried to distance herself from. Director Michelle Savill wraps up the arrested development, coming-of-age cringe comedy in a moment of joy that spells big things for the first-time feature filmmaker.
-
SXSW 2022: CLEAN: Finding Dignity Amidst Humanity’s Shit, Piss, & Viscera
Or, The Saintliness of Trauma Cleaning
I found Clean, an Australian documentary about Sandra Pankhurst, founder of successful trauma cleaning business STC Services, to be incredibly emotionally impactful.
Allow me to get personal for a moment. I’ve spent the last seven years working at Community First! Village, a 51 acre community in East Austin that provides permanent supportive housing for people coming out of chronic homelessness. It’s a place of great beauty and hope, providing permanent solutions for settling and belonging to people who have been cast out, become separated from their families, and experienced massive trauma. Amidst all that beauty and belonging that I am honored to witness, there’s also a lot of addiction, mental illness, sickness, and death. The average life expectancy of someone who’s experienced chronic homelessness is under 60 years old. Sometimes my friends and acquaintances are slowly dying. Sometimes they pass suddenly and without warning. And sometimes our community gathers to pray and weep and sing over their bodies as they’re removed from their homes (THEIR HOMES!) and taken to their final place of burial. I’ll forever remember a moment like this when I was watching a dear friend’s body being loaded into a hearse… and I could smell him. How visceral that was. My friend, now a body that is already decomposing, but also a soul now made whole. In that moment our founder Alan Graham reminded me that this was the “bouquet of Christ”. In Alan’s own unique theology, it’s the smell of shit, piss, and viscera… the smell of decay… that reminds us of those whom Christ loved and ministered to the most: the despised, the outcast, the downtrodden, the forgotten. We’ve largely conveniently forgotten this in modern American Christianity.
And it is for this very personal and likely hard to relate to reason that I watched Clean and frankly saw Sandra Pankhurst as somewhat of a Christ figure (I suspect she would have rejected this lens outright, and that’s okay). Sandra’s story is itself an incredible one. Adopted, abandoned, starting a family only to realize she was a threat to her family because she was not well. She soon recognized her trans identity and transitioned from male to female, then entered into drug-fueled prostitution. And then, against all odds, she became a highly successful businesswoman and inspirational public speaker. Sandra stumbled into the unique line of work called “trauma cleaning”, and it changed everything. Going into the homes of hoarders, the homes of murder victims and those who’ve died by suicide, the homes of those who died alone and forgotten, the homes of drug addicts and those so sick their spaces have been reduced to squalor; she simply cleans without judgment. Who is Sandra to judge, after all? She’s seen it all, survived it all, and now she’s running a business teaching a team of dedicated workers how to trudge through rot and brains and rodent feces to change people’s lives and redeem the spaces where trauma has happened. It’s just one of the most powerful symbols of tenacity and hope that I can recall, thanks to a documentary team who was literally willing to go into the worst and most rotten places to tell Sandra’s incredible story.
Shot over the course of several years, largely before the pandemic, and following right through COVID into Sandra’s experience of the pandemic as a person diagnosed with a terminal case of COPD, Clean tells the story of one person’s incredible and inspiring journey, but also bravely reminds us of any number of societal challenges we’ve collectively chosen to skip over and ignore to our detriment. The scenes that the saints of STC Services are cleaning up are the stuff of horror films and nightmares. These people, Sandra’s people, are the unsung heroes who know how to aid the living by stepping into their spaces without any judgment at all and help them to function, as well as salvage spaces where bodies have decayed and leaked into carpet and floorboard alike.
Filmmaker Lachlan McLeod and his team went right into these places with Sandra and her team. They put on all the PPE and shot amidst the rodents and the needles in order to bring us this profoundly human story. It’s vital storytelling and shows the profundity of what the documentary format can do. We owe a debt of gratitude to those who do the work of trauma cleaning the world over, and this world is a better place for Sandra Pankhurst having been here. And while Sandra herself might have dismissed my experience of seeing this former trans addict prostitute as a Christ figure, the legacy of her life, as depicted in this film, speaks for itself.
And I’m Out.
-
WINDFALL Fails to Hit the Mark and Then Some
A surface level home invasion character study
Awkward. If there’s a life lesson to be learned from writer-director Charlie McDowell’s (The One I Love) latest film, Windfall, a home-invasion drama starring frequent collaborator Jason Segel (How I Met Your Mother, Forgetting Sarah Marshall), it’s both simple and absolutely essential: Home invaders should not only wear comfortable, slip-resistant shoes, they should make sure those same comfortable, slip-resistant shoes are properly laced up and double-knotted. If not, tragedy, or at minimum, comedy, might befall the poor home invader who realizes he or she forgot to wear comfortable, slip-resistant shoes and just as importantly, double-knot their shoelaces. Other lessons, life or otherwise, contained in Windfall, however, are few and far between.
When we meet Segel’s unnamed, downwardly mobile character, he’s enjoying a sun-filled day at an expansive, expensive, ranch-style home ensconced in rows of orange trees. Segel’s character, identified only as “Nobody” in the credits, doesn’t own the home or the surrounding property, of course. He’s a home invader non-urgently seeing how the other half (i.e., the haves to his have-nots) lives before strolling through the house looking for valuables to pilfer. Before he can pilfer said valuables, however, the home’s billionaire tech owner (Jesse Plemons) and the tech owner’s wife (Lily Collins) return unexpectedly, leaving Segel’s character with nowhere to run, walk, or crawl, ultimately forcing him into the unenviable position of either surrendering to the unarmed CEO and his wife or taking them hostage.
Sometimes a stroll in an orange grove isn’t a stroll. Segel’s character takes the second, ultimately harder path, using a newfound firearm to strong-arm the CEO and his wife into compliance. Except, unfortunately, he doesn’t have a plan, probably because he never expected to be caught. Instead, Segel’s character attempts to make it up as he goes along, the “it” being what to do with the CEO and his wife and how to get away with the pilfered valuables before they can free themselves and contact law enforcement. Over the next few hours, the plan changes, from leaving them behind immediately to going nowhere, the latter in the hopes that the CEO’s promise of roughly $500K in cold, hard cash will be delivered the following day, in turn giving Nobody the chance to escape and start a new life somewhere else.
Unsurprisingly, Nobody’s continuing presence in the CEO and his wife’s lives begins to expose fissures and fractures that were maybe always there. A tech-bro through and through, the alpha male CEO attempts to buy off Nobody (because every relationship is a transaction) and when that doesn’t work to the CEO’s satisfaction, manipulate Nobody into making a possibly fatal mistake. Nobody reciprocates the non-favor, challenging the CEO’s wife and the life choices she’s made (i.e., trading her body and companionship for wealth, status, and security), though McDowell, working from a slightly undercooked screenplay co-written by Justin Lader and Andrew Kevin Walker (8MM, Se7en) repeatedly emphasizes the possibility that each character, alone and collectively, may not be who they present themselves to be.
Just another sunny day, hanging out with your own personal home invader. McDowell leans into this interpretation by deliberately not naming the characters. They’re meant to be contemporary stand-ins, each one representing a type, even an archetype, rather than a fully fleshed out, three-dimensional character. We learn the least about Nobody’s character. Outside of his impoverished state and his outsized grudge against the CEO (possibly linked to Nobody’s unemployed status), Nobody’s defined by his actions or lack thereof. He’s far from a professional thief; blundering, stumbling, and bumbling into committing multiple felonies. The CEO likewise shows little beyond what we see and assume: He’s a self-entitled, egotistical narcissist who believes his own media-manipulated branding while his wife (Collins and McDowell are married in real life), a lowly assistant he plucked out of obscurity and massive student loan debt, may be the most survival-obsessed member of the unfortunate trio.
Prettily shot in Ojai, California, a decision that informed and guided the screenplay from day 1, Windfall isn’t so much a home-invasion thriller (it has few thrills) as it is a chamber piece or character study, examining each character in turn and how they respond to threats to their well-being, physical and otherwise. That examination, though, stubbornly remains surface level throughout, content with making over-obvious points (and point-scoring) about our current socio-economic climate, the growing divide between the upper and lower classes, and, if you screw your eyes tightly enough, the vanishing middle class as represented by Segel’s down-and-out unnamed character.
Windfall begins streaming Friday, March 18th, on Netflix.
-
DEEP WATER Takes A Deliriously Deep Dive Into Mind- and Reality-Bending Absurdity
There’s little psychological insight or meticulous plotting common to Patricia Highsmith’s novels
Who watches the watcher? We do. There’s a moment in the aptly named Deep Water, the semi-return to form for Adrian Lyne (Jacob’s Ladder, Fatal Attraction, Flashdance), the onetime master of the erotic thriller, where Melinda Van Allen (Ana de Armas), wealth-adjacent wife to amoral tech-bro billionaire Vic (Ben Affleck), explicitly recognizes his likely involvement in a string of disappearances and murders and fully embraces her role as the twisted object of her husband’s desire. It might not be the exalted romantic love of fiction or even reality, but for Melinda, an unreconstructed narcissist, it’s the next best thing: Vic’s willing to not just kill for her, but kill to keep her in the self-destructive relationship that defines their marriage.
That line — and the perverse thought behind that line — underpins at least one possible interpretation of the sadomasochistic relationship at the center of Deep Water, the third adaptation of Patricia Highsmith’s 1957 novel and the first in English. Best known for writing the oft-adapted Ripley novels (the source material for one of Alfred Hitchcock’s minor classics, Strangers on a Train) and, more recently, the Oscar-nominated Carol, Highsmith mixed keen psychological insight into the complex, contradictory fears, anxieties, and desires inherent in romantic and platonic relationships and mid-20th-century masculinity with nimble, muscular prose and to make meticulously plotted page-turners that have enraptured readers for more than half a century.
A quiet moment at home before/after one or more messy murders. There’s little psychological insight or meticulous plotting, however, to be found in Deep Water. Deliberately disregarding psychological realism, logical storytelling, or believable character motivations, the spry 81-year-old Lyne trains his still stylish eye on the moment-by-moment interactions between his two warring leads, the semi-palatial mansion that’s both their home and the site of multiple weekend parties where Vic and Melinda’s fraught relationship apparently disintegrates in public view. The murderously jealous Vic refuses to remove himself from proximity to his perpetually adulterous wife and she, in turn, deliberately flaunts her infidelities, a string of handsy male “friends” in full view of friends, acquaintances, and various hangers-on.
What originally starts as a murder-mystery with the disappearance of one man before the opening credits even begin—giving dark humor-prone Vic a chance to take responsibility for his death and scaring off one of Melinda’s interchangeable lovers, Joel Dash (Brendan C. Miller), a discount Brad Pitt clone—turns into an absurdist comedy. In quick succession, Joel’s departure leaves an open door for another potential lover, Charlie De Lisle (Jacob Elordi), a local pianist of tall stature and mediocre skill, and when Charlie, like the others before and after him, exits the frame, a third third lover and ex-boyfriend, Tony Cameron (Finn Wittrock), enters stage left, seemingly conspiring in his own potential demise.
A seemingly static image freighted with meaning. And that doesn’t even include Vic’s own personal Greek chorus, Jonas Fernandez (Dash Mihok) and Grant (Lil Rel Howery), who have his back on important (or unimportant) matters, or the local writer, Don Wilson (Pulitzer Prize-winner Tracy Letts), who’s apparently the only individual within a hundred miles who suspects Vic in the otherwise suspicious disappearances and deaths of Melinda’s lovers. Everyone else, including an ineffectual, barely present police department, collectively shrugs their shoulders and moves on with their lives offscreen.
That ludicrousness extends to a third-act that, while not exactly going off the rails, drives at least one errant car off a conveniently placed cliff or a decidedly ambiguous resolution that trades the clear-cut ending of Highsmith’s novel for something entirely different, suggesting that Melinda, a supreme narcissist, and Vic, a possible sociopath, have found the perfect life partner in each other. It’s far from a tidy or even persuasive ending, but somehow feels right in the moment for Affleck and de Armas’s characters. At first bored and disinterested, blankly, superficially engaged with the world around him, Vic’s torturous awakening via carefully emphasized rising dialogue, reveals a man willing to do anything and everything to keep what he perceives as his and the materially comfortable, upper-middle-class life he’s manufactured for himself.
Deep Water will be available to stream on Friday, March 18th, via Hulu.
-
SXSW 2022: Winona Ryder Makes THE COW Stand out from the Herd
A beguiling feature that uses structure and star-power to weave a compelling mystery
The Cow marks the feature writing/directorial debut of Eli Horowitz, co-creator of Homecoming (the podcast and Amazon series), alongside co-writer Matthew Derby. As you’d expect with such a pedigree, the film has an interesting, non-linear structure, weaving around a mystery that gets weirder as the film progresses.
Kath (Ryder) and her boyfriend of a year, Max (John Gallagher Jr.), setting off to the redwoods for the weekend. Arriving at the place Max booked, they find a chilly reception awaiting them in the form of Al (Owen Teague), a lanky 20-something who apparently also has a reservation. His girlfriend, Greta (Brianne Tju), is more amenable, inviting them to crash on the sofa and sort it out the next day. The following morning Kath wakes up to find that Max and Greta have absconded in the night. After driving home alone, she finds she cannot contact Max. Days go by, and bemusement at the situation turns to irritation and suspicion. She tries to track down Greta by reaching out to the cabin’s owner Nicholas (Dermot Mulroney). The pair hit it off, and soon immerse themselves in a little sleuthing to try and figure out what really happened to Max.
A genre-crossing affair, The Cow weaves together a detective story, psychological thriller, horror story, and drops a little mid-life crisis into the mix. The end result is surprisingly breezy, perhaps even too lightweight. The thrust of the film comes from the simple mystery. Why did Max disappear with a woman he only just met? While Kath’s efforts uncover more intrigue, the structure of The Cow shifts back and forth in time, flipping to Max’s perspective to unfurl more of the story. The structure further opens up (and adds to) the mystery, but also allows playful contrasts between Kath’s life with Max, and the burgeoning relationship with Nicholas, a refreshingly adult figure after the infantile Max. Their differences in age and the realization that a younger woman has seemingly snatched Max away from her feed into Kath’s contemplation of her fleeting youth, and sense that time is running out; themes that are nicely developed within her character’s arc, and a little more heavily stamped into other aspects of the film. The time hops make up for some of the shortfalls in a script that struggles to build a real feeling of suspense or danger. The aforementioned breezy quality keeps you primed for an escalation or ramping up of weirdness that never fully manifests. The Cow, quirky in humor and tonally playful, treads a line between dark and unnerving, and farcical B-movie, and you walk away feeling it should have leaned harder into one or the other to really make a mark.
Mulroney is as natural and smooth as you’d expect, while Teague and Tju are operating on the wavelength where the film perhaps should be. Winona Ryder is a joy to watch, bringing depth to the role of a woman grappling with being ghosted by a partner who, let’s be clear now, was a douche and clearly punching above his weight class in dating her. The transition from “I’m fine” to “wtf” to “maybe I’m better off”, and everything in between, is sublime, as are her subtle gestures and deliveries that touch on her insecurities about her age.
Overall, The Cow manages to take a low stakes mystery and build it into something compelling, but lacking a real edge. Structural time shifts and an unnerving score by David Baldwin compensate for some narrative failings, in a film that needs to lean a little harder into its genre trappings. But real substance comes from Winona Ryder, whose rich performance makes The Cow stand out from the herd.
-
SXSW 2022: TO LESLIE is a Tour de Force for Andrea Riseborough
A warts and all performance anchors this exploration of addiction and the value of self-belief.
The theme of substance abuse and addiction often hits close to home. Many films stumble trying to humanize the issue, but To Leslie shines. A richly textured tale written by Ryan Binaco, informed by his experiences with his own mother, Andrea Riseborough (Mandy, Possessor) stars as Leslie, a woman from West Texas who win $196,000 in the state lottery. But there’s something off about her demeanor in the footage of her first introduction, despite the promise of a better life. Cut to six years later, she’s ejected from a diny motel room without a penny to her name. She seeks out her teenage son James (Owen Teague), who, sensing her state, refuses to take her in. Leslie, left with little options, finds herself on a bus back to her hometown where she seeks out old friends Dutch (Stephen Root) and Nancy (a viscerally angry performance from Allison Janney), who also make clear that the bridge has been burnt. Worse for wear, she is found by local motel owner Sweeney (Marc Maron, GLOW, Sword of Trust). After learning about her past, he takes pity on her and offers her a place to stay and a job as a cleaner. For Leslie, this may be her last opportunity to climb from the bottom of a bottle, rouse herself from her stupor, and try to piece her life back together.
Directed by Michael Morris (Better Call Saul, among others), To Leslie swiftly outlines Leslie’s multiple sins before immersing itself in her hard fought path to rebuild her life. The film doesn’t sanitize or excuse things, planting her firmly in the fallout of her destructive behavior. Old manipulative tricks and cries for attention fail her. Wrecked relationships leave her not just isolated, but resented. This is not a place to heal, but to submit herself to one final punishment. But there’s something about the faith and lack of judgement from Sweeney that seems to strike a chord with Leslie; the film largely revolves around this burgeoning friendship. They form a genuine bond over uncomfortable truths shared and epiphanies realized, a kindling of faith that spurs Leslie on to face up to her failures and the consequences of her actions and to seek a possible path forward.
The opening credits serve as an effective montage to get us up to speed, using “Here I Am” by Dolly Parton to establish the country roots of the piece and the ballad-like structure of the film. To Leslie feels like a country song, working its way through soulful hurt and ending with a glimmer of hope. Country tracks throughout, from artists like Willie Nelson, Linda Perry, and George Jones, aptly reflect the emotional journey Leslie undertakes, and a newly recorded track over the credits from Patty Griffin adds a fitting coda. The sounds and ambiance are complemented by considered production values that feed into a visual shorthand. Cinematographer Larkin Seiple balances the surroundings to highlight Leslie’s discontent in stark daylight, and safer surrounds in the amber hues of a bar. Shot on 35mm, a grainy aesthetic complements the setting and worn down nature of Leslie’s existence.
Further texture comes from the outstanding supporting cast, most notably Maron, who manages to infuse an authentic goodness into his well-worn character. But the film rests on a tour de force performance from Riseborough. She brings nuance and humanity to a flawed but still sympathetic character, with believable, desperate shifts in mood as she transitions from her lowest ebb through this ongoing, hard-fought journey. It’s in the physicality of the character too, beyond bruises and lanky hair, in jittery movements and guarded posture, that she comes alive. Her performance is akin to an injured animal just waiting for the next wrong to befall it, or bite the hand of anyone who approaches. Riseborough’s performance is a crucial contribution to a truly sincere and skillfully wrought tale that affirms the healing power of support, and self-belief.
-
X is a New Horror Cult Classic
BOOGIE NIGHTS meets THE TEXAS CHAINSAW MASSACRE in Ti West’s latest
X, which hits theaters mere days after its premiere at SXSW, has Ti West returning to feature length narratives after a six year respite, with a different film than fans of his more deliberately paced chillers would expect. The film puts Mia Goth front and center in a group of young exotic dancers and their boyfriends, who are heading off to a secluded farm outside of Houston to shoot a porn flick in 1979. The only problem is the elderly couple who own the farm where they are filming their cinematic masterwork has no idea what the group is up to in the cabin on their property. For fans of horror, this is really a standard setup that has West flexing his writing and directing skills, delivering a surprising depth and humor to these characters and situations as the visceral slasher takes us into some unexpected pockets of the human psyche.
The fear of our starry-eyed porn stars getting busted by their elderly (and of course evangelical) hosts supplies the first act with the bulk of its tension, as West layers in some rather unexpected themes among more obvious lowbrow humor. West explores beauty, mortality, love, and sex work as the characters begin to shoot “The Farmer’s Daughters”. X operates on a dual bandwidth, using the film within a film and other mechanisms to add a chilling subtext to sequences, particularly one where Goth encounters the elderly matriarch of the home intercutting their creepy interactions with the pornographic version. The elderly woman takes a rather unexpected fancy to the young woman, who she describes as having “that something special.” Once we run the porn narrative to a rather sex positive conclusion, the film switches gears and bares its gnarled teeth.
The characters and performances here are what really makes this film “something special.” While the charismatic porn folks are suprisingly sharp in their hot takes on the legitimacy of sex work, using both humor and humanity to make them even more endearing, it’s the elderly couple who are given a rather complex drive to take us through to the final act. It’s at the start of their killing spree that I knew I was watching something truly different, when I was actually almost sympathizing with the hunters as much as the hunted, with the first kill being a very solid “good for her ‘’ moment. It’s a mix of mortality and jealousy that motivates our octogenarian executioners in a film that, because of this and its more progressive leanings, sets itself apart from more superficial, stereotypical slashers.
This may honestly be the first A24 horror film where the mass audience marketing actually undersells the brutality that awaits them in that darkened theater. While there’s plenty of nudity and gore, and moments that will no doubt make your skin crawl, X intelligently subverts tropes and expectations. This is thanks not only to a great script but also to some truly engrossing performances by Goth, Jenna Ortega, Kid Cudi, Martin Henderson, and Brittany Snow, who take the horror stereotypes and imbue them with a humanity that makes you invested in their fates. West has delivered a raucously disturbing crowd pleaser of a horror film that is a welcome addition to his filmography. X is Boogie Nights meets The Texas Chainsaw Massacre and is an absolute blast to see with a crowd.
-
SXSW 2022: EVERYTHING EVERYWHERE ALL AT ONCE, a Manic and Magnificent Marvel
Daniels returns with a film brimming with spectacle and soul.
We all wonder about what might have been. Realities where making different choices might have resulted in different outcomes. The duo behind Swiss Army Man, Daniel Kwan and Daniel Scheinert (better known as Daniels), seems to have long contemplated these paths not taken, judging by their 2014 interactive short film Possibilia. Everything Everywhere All at Once blows open this concept, taking a wild cosmic swing at questions about potential and possibilities, planted within a fracturing family unit.
Evelyn (a stellar Michelle Yeoh) lives in a universe where her fate has taken her down a path of wrong choices. She’s in a rut: a disappointment to her father, distant from her husband, estranged from her daughter, and her laundromat business seems on the verge of financial ruin. En route to a meeting with IRS inspector Deirdre Beaubeirdra (Jamie Lee Curtis, clearly enjoying herself), her rather hapless husband Waymond (Ke Huy Quan) starts to speak strange words in an unfamiliar tone. Another version of Waymond crosses a dimensional divide to communicate a message from the Alphaverse, a herald that Evelyn might be their last hope to win a multidimensional war, waged by an entity who has managed to broach every strand of reality and seems intent on using this power to end them all. Evelyn isn’t the “One”—she’s the opposite. A life of missed opportunities might make her the perfect conduit for all the talents of her other selves to help win this war. Her monotonous, unfulfilling life is blown wide open at the possibilities of life, the threat to all existence, and the chance to reconnect with her daughter.
Everything Everywhere hurdles you into a fragmented reality, throwing concepts and events at a startling pace. But there is an elegance to the film, and an anchoring in an emotionally resonant core that holds you tight,no matter how abstract or absurd it may get. The plot has a distinctly sci-fi feel, one where Evelyn is introduced to technology from the Alphaverse that allows psychic bridges across the multiverse, drawing on the skills of her counterparts (hibachi chef, opera singer, and martial arts action star, to name but a few) to try and survive the onslaught coming from the disciples of this mysterious, all powerful enemy. This infusion of skills offers opportunities for Evelyn to get herself out of mounting sticky situations, and also offers the best opportunity for the Daniels to veer into full Loony Tunes mode. These connections are initiated by carrying out the most improbable act in that moment, one of several apparent nods to Douglas Adams, leading to some of the more farcical and brazen moments of the film, from dildo nunchuks to buttplug-fueled battles, from black hole bagels to a scene featuring two rocks that is one of the more moving things you’ll see in this or any year. The film revels in a wild creativity.
Events blow open Evelyn’s mind not just in her own timeline, but in those of other Evelyns across the multiverse. Shock gives way to reflection and further yearning for what might have been, while also providing contrast to her current issues. She is a woman adrift in cultural clashes, social anxieties, casual and overt racism, not to mention the emotional struggles within her own family. Her father Gong Gong (the legendary James Hong) has looked down on his daughter since she disobeyed him to move to America and marry Waymond. Her naïve husband fails to grasp her struggles and sallies on, sticking googly eyes on things in the hope they make their days a little brighter. Most pertinent is her broken relationship with daughter Joy (Stephanie Hsu), with Evelyn unable to restrain her judgment of her daughter’s career, weight, and sexuality. Yeoh’s performance is the glue that binds this fracturing spectacular together. In many ways, the film seems like a meta-capper to her career and an explosive tribute to her talents. From worn down, befuddled laundromat operator to someone grappling with generational trauma or a woman vibrant with omnipresent power, she handles them all with aplomb. Ke Huy Quan (The Goonies, Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom) is a gentle delight, the beating heart of the film, while Hsu (Shang Chi), delivers a breakout performance, exuding confidence and depth in an ever-shifting landscape.
Kwan and Scheinert have crafted a film that is meditative and manic, expansive and intimate, sublime and exceedingly silly. Playful nods to films such as The One, Cloud Atlas, The Matrix, and Ratatouille, or the influences of Wong Kar-Wai’s distinct aesthetic, delight rather than distract. Wild ideas, beautifully complemented by a kaleidoscope of bold colors and images from cinematographer Larkin Seipl, are deftly edited by Paul Rogers. Fight choreography harkens back to the golden era of the Shaw Bros., albeit with a distinctly Daniels slant. (Fanny pack combat is legit, people.) Infantile humor, notably running gags featuring sausage fingers and racoons, threaten to throw things off course, but its continued weight actually holds everything down. These ludicrous sights of the multiverse are also tempered by more tender moments. Investing in this Chinese-American family allows the film to explore regret, family dynamics, and generational trauma, and remind us that potential lies within each of us, to be great, and to be kind. Everything Everywhere all at Once is a truly soulful and spectacular vision.
-
SXSW 2022: BODIES BODIES BODIES, a Gen-Z Fueled Murderous Meltdown
Bickering, backstabbing, and blood, with a biting social commentary
Bodies Bodies Bodies nestles nicely into an ongoing, unofficial theme at this year’s SXSW of intimate locations hosting situations that rapidly escalate into colossal clusterfucks. In this instance, it’s a remote, opulent mansion, host to a group of 20-somethings planning a debauched weekend under the shadow of an incoming hurricane. But the planned party instead descends into bickering, backstabbing, and blood.
Fresh out of rehab, and freshly coupled to new girlfriend Bee (Maria Bakalova), Sophie (Amandla Stenberg) is the last of her friend group to arrive. Greeted by their host David (Pete Davidson) they receive a chillier reception from his girlfriend Emma (Chase Sui Wonders), while another friend, Jordan (Myha’la Herrold), is confrontational from the offset. A warmer welcome comes from the effervescent Alice (Rachel Sennott), who has dragged along her new beau Greg (Lee Pace). Awkward reunions give way to alcohol, drugs, and further confrontations among the crew. To break the tension, someone suggests playing a game, the titular “Bodies Bodies Bodies.” A random drawing designates one player the murdered, the lights go out, a “victim” is tapped on the shoulder and plays “dead,” the lights come on, and the survivors have to guess who the killer is. The game’s first round offers an appetizer for what’s to come as the groups start to circle one another, pointing out each of their tells, their habits, exploiting their knowledge to try to guess who the killer is. Things turn sour, bringing the game to a halt. Not long after, one of their number is found outside the house, covered in blood, dying from a neck wound. Panic engulfs the group just as the hurricane hits, taking out the power and their cell phones. The group struggles to hold their shit together, and before long, more bodies pile up and the gang continues to pile on each other.
Writer Sarah DeLappe, working from a story by Kristen Roupenian, turns in a sharp and biting script that weaves a whodunnit reminiscent of the Clue or Werewolf games. Social anxiety among a group of teen girls provides perfect fuel for any film that relies on an infusion of mistrust and paranoia. The murders themselves are nicely executed (no pun intended), but are (refreshingly) a backdrop to the even more savage moments between this circle of “friends.” Snarky and sharp comments and resentment give to years of animosity and secrets, rising to the surface or weaponized to cause further hurt. Issues with addiction, fidelity, privilege, resentment, and more come to the surface. The film doesn’t fill in all the blanks, but plants you in the midst of a long-simmering series of issues. Beyond the personal strife, Bodies uses these characters to offers a wider skewering of Gen-Z, from virtue-signaling, hyper-awareness, and the superficiality that stems from social media to the embrace of new-age spirituality. This is where the film finds even more of a black comedy streak, one that tilts slightly farcical at times.
The film ultimately rides on its brilliantly effective cast, and such flawed characters gives each of them plenty of juicy material to come to grips with. The performances feel very reactive, feeding nicely into this combustible mix. Bakalova (Borat Subsequent Moviefilm) is quietly understated but crucially effective in the role of an outsider dropped into this shitshow. Pace (Pushing Daisies, A Single Man) and Davidson (The King of Staten Island, SNL) going head in a pissing contest is also a highlight. But it’s Sennott (Shiva Baby) who steals the entire film with impeccable comedic timing and delivery, notably a line about being an “ally” that is one of the line reads of the year. Together, they bring an exuberant, chaotic energy that director Halina Reijn harnesses to fuel this pressure cooker scenario. Slick pacing, a continually moving camera embedded within the girls, and the use of flashlights and cell phones to illuminate shots make for an immersive experience, while a thumping score ratchets up the discordant and unnerving mood. But it’s the pitch-black humor and biting social commentary, more than the bloody kills, that makes Bodies Bodies Bodies stand out.