Home

  • The Archivist Volume XVII — Adam West and Cathy Lee Crosby Star In Goofy DC Television

    The Archivist Volume XVII — Adam West and Cathy Lee Crosby Star In Goofy DC Television

    Welcome to the Archive. Following the infamous “Format Wars” (R.I.P. VHS), a multitude of films found themselves in danger of being forgotten forever due to their admittedly niche appeal. Thankfully, Warner Bros. established the Archive Collection, a Disc On Demand and Streaming service devoted to some of the more idiosyncratic pieces of cinema ever made. Being big fans of the label, we here at Cinapse thought it prudent to establish a column devoted to these unusual gems. Thus “The Archivist” was born — a biweekly look at some of the best, boldest and most batshit motion pictures the Shield has to offer. Some of these will be recent additions to the collection, while others will be titles that have been available for awhile. With over 1,500 pictures procurable on Warner Archive (and more being added every month), there’s no possible way we’ll get to all of them. But trust me when we say we’re sure going to try.

    Welcome back, Archivists! This week, with another Marvel Cinematic Universe episode hitting theaters, I thought it would be a good idea to explore some of the many DC properties The Warner Archives has available for your viewing… pleasure? I can’t say I found my experience with these two titles very pleasurable. I could hardly muddle through one of them. Apparently the label’s characters weren’t always so well represented as they are on today’s popular television shows. The early days weren’t all bad, of course. You probably know and love the Adam West Batman show from the 60s, but did you know he also played the role in a pair of variety show-style “comedy” romps complete with a laugh track? You probably know, and might love, the 70s Wonder Woman series, starring Lynda Carter, but did you know tennis pro Cathy Lee Crosby actually originated the role in a failed pilot? You might find it interesting to see that character’s live-action origins, or think it’s neat to see Mr. West and Burt Ward reprise their iconic roles almost a decade after they had hung up their capes, but I will have a hard time recommending either of these ridiculous trifles.

    Let’s get this week’s mega-stinker out of the way. I had heard about Legends Of The Superheroes from multiple trusted sources. 70s babies remember it fondly, and they claimed I had to see it because it was both bizarre and hilarious. It’s bizarre, all right, but not only is it completely unfunny, it is so stagey and stale, it becomes painfully hard to watch. This is the kind of horrible that makes me feel embarrassed. That isn’t embarrassment on behalf of the people involved, I mean I start to think to myself, “God… at least nobody knows I’m watching this.”

    In the first episode, The Challenge, The Legion of Doom, lead by Mordru, has created a doomsday device, and commissioned The Riddler (Frank Gorshin!) to devise a series of clues to keep The Justice League busy on their mission to save the proverbial day. Each clue is a setup for another stupid gag, including The Riddler posing as a Freud-like psychiatrist, and the dynamic duo racing Mordru on jet skis. In the second TV special, The Roast, the sad situation gets even worse. Ed MacMahon (the only cast member capable of culling a couple limp laughs) hosts a roast. That’s right: a Friar’s Club Roast between The Justice League and The Legion of Doom. Think about how awful that sounds. Now, turn the stupid up to ten and you might come close to how terrible it really is. These actors couldn’t make the comedy happen in a more straight-ahead, good vs. evil comic book story set up, how could they possibly do it when they are expected to tell jokes? It makes the bomb gag from Batman: The Movie look like classic comedy gold (which… it kind of already was).

    The almost-worst thing about these specials is, if it weren’t for the laugh track, it would play like bad high school theater. The worst-worst thing about it is a character called Ghetto Man who struts onto the stage and does uncomfortable racial humor. “The Green Lantern don’t qualify for ‘colored people’.” Do I need to go on? It’s unbelievable.

    The 1974 Wonder Woman Pilot, on the other hand, was kind enough to at least begin with some promise. It features a funky acid jazz theme song, the acting is surprisingly strong (could we expect anything but strength from Ricardo Montalban as the primary antagonist?), and the script is solid… until it isn’t. Cathy Lee Crosby’s version is still an Amazon, but along with a sans-tiara and lasso costume, she is also more of a highly skilled double-agent than a superhero. After books containing the secret identities of her fellow agents are stolen, she must travel to France and retrieve them.

    The movie opens with some women’s lib convictions, but abandons them completely about 20 minutes in. I was kind of happy about that, only because it was taking a sort of condescending tone with the theme. Wonder Woman’s tribal leader on Paradise Island spouts a monologue about how important it is to show men how strong women can be, but reminds her to also show their most important value: sensitivity. Once you muscle past that silliness, and the sillier/creepier father-daughter relationship she seems to have with her boss at the agency, there is some good shooting and witty dialogue to enjoy. Then, the action takes off… like a half-inflated balloon.

    I was willing to forgive a few illogical steps in plotting and character motivations until our hero has to fight, bow staff to bow staff, against one of her greedy Amazon sisters. It was like watching two people go at it with weapons they don’t know how to use, and choreography they forgot to memorize. The awkward sequence is clumsily sewn together by a kind of slow motion close up patchwork. Just like the rest of the film, this scene just doesn’t quite come together. Only a year later, the iconic Wonder Woman series we know today premiered on ABC.

    Normally I have some dumb joke here that ties the movies together with snack food, but… I really have to say you should watch the original Adam West Batman movie, and… anything else, instead.

  • The Archivist Volume XVI: Sort of John Turturro — BEING HUMAN [1994] and BRAIN DONORS [1992]

    The Archivist Volume XVI: Sort of John Turturro — BEING HUMAN [1994] and BRAIN DONORS [1992]

    Welcome to the Archive. Following the infamous “Format Wars” (R.I.P. VHS), a multitude of films found themselves in danger of being forgotten forever due to their admittedly niche appeal. Thankfully, Warner Bros. established the Archive Collection, a Disc On Demand and Streaming service devoted to some of the more idiosyncratic pieces of cinema ever made. Being big fans of the label, we here at Cinapse thought it prudent to establish a column devoted to these unusual gems. Thus “The Archivist” was born — a biweekly look at some of the best, boldest and most batshit motion pictures the Shield has to offer. Some of these will be recent additions to the collection, while others will be titles that have been available for awhile. With over 1,500 pictures procurable on Warner Archive (and more being added every month), there’s no possible way we’ll get to all of them. But trust me when we say we’re sure going to try.

    Archiviteers, I have to begin this week’s installment with a confession. Originally, the plan was to recommend a double-feature covering Being Human and The World According To Garp. Well, for your information, the latter title is no longer available from The Warner Archives. Sad news, I know. After several lengthy sojourns through Warner’s lovely pit of cinematic resurrection, I couldn’t seem to find anything that quite sounded like the perfect match for Being Human. Obviously, the whole point was to select two films featuring performances by the late Robin Williams, but in a pinch, I couldn’t help but notice the noble comedic tribute Brain Donors was being preserved in The Archives. That film just happens to have John Turturro, and absolutely nothing else, in common with that Williams film for which I so badly needed a companion piece. So, without further disclaiming, let me tell you about a movie that barely has John Turturro in it, and another that has almost too much of him.

    I am still reeling from the death of Robin Williams. I hadn’t been very interested in his most recent work, so seeing a lost film from earlier in his illustrious career is a true joy. Being Human cuts five slices of life from human history which allow us to watch one deeply flawed man find his way through the loss and reunion of his family, among other things. We meet Hector (Williams) as a homo sapien cave dweller, then he is a slave in Rome (to his master, John Turturro), then a Scottish servant to a priest in the crusades, a shipwrecked Portuguese Renaissance-era nobleman, and finally, a modern day business man who has estranged himself from his kids. He is cowardly, selfish, and can rarely manage to do the right thing.

    The performances are excellent all around from a cast including Vincent D’Onofrio, Robert Carlyle, Theresa Russell, Bill Nighy, William H. Macy, and Lorraine Bracco. These actors do as much for some notable authenticity in each era as the set design and costuming. Each episode creates a surprisingly rich atmosphere to explore, accompanying the increasingly intriguing and often funny adventures of Hector. That’s a fine achievement, but the film itself is not. Apparently director Bill Forsythe lost control of the expensive production, and Warner Brothers’ oversight is responsible for a hacky, on-the-nose narration read by Theresa Russell over the soundtrack, as well as the enforcement of a happy ending. Let me be clear, this is no turd, but the “improvements” resulting from studio interference do great damage to a film which would otherwise have been a fascinating, deliberately paced experience. There is some pay-off in the end, as we realize the life story Williams’ character details to his children parallels that of the five different Hectors throughout history. That’s a lovely revelation, considering the first couple of episodes seemed, at first, nearly pointless. This one is definitely flawed, but I won’t be calling up the universe to demand my time be reimbursed.

    And now for something completely different…

    Here is it folks, the John Turturro part of the supposed John Turturro double feature. David and Jerry Zucker (some of the Airpane! and Naked Gun guys) took on a rather intimidating challenge when they produced a film working under the title Lame Ducks. The Zuckers, writer Pat Proft (who wrote basically every non-Mel Brooks parody movie), and director Dennis Dugan (oh god… google the guy’s filmography for yourself) came together, and despite studio interference from Paramount, managed to create a pretty damn solid update of The Marx Brothers’ A Night at the Opera. Turturro (in the Groucho role), Mel Smith (Chico), and Bob Nelson (Harpo) do some extraordinary work as facsimiles of the comedy legends. Nelson is especially wonderful as Jacques, a not entirely mute but fully loveable stand-in for Harpo. His timing is phenomenal, and his dedication to the role really shines while juggling the enormous prop arsenal the silent Marx Brother so often plucked from the infinite. They may not be perfect impressions, but if any trio of actors could give The Marx Brothers a run for their money, then what the hell would be so special about The Marx Brothers?

    As one would expect from the Zuckers, Brain Donors (a title selected by the studio) boasts a bombastic whirlwind of jokes from minute one. Most of them land gloriously, but this is not a perfect comedy. One or two jokes will hit the ground and roll near the target, while others will soar so far into the distance, it’s hard to know where they were aiming. The more I think about it, however, the more I realize how nit-picky that seems in retrospect. I had a great time watching this movie. My girlfriend would walk into the room from time to time, paying no attention to the screen, laugh at a joke she heard, and stick around to see what would happen next. It’s a lot of fun, especially for those of us who grew up watching classic comedians like The Three Stooges or Laurel and Hardy. Seek this thing out!

  • THE ARCHIVIST Volume XV: Insane Italian Sci-Fi Adventures With WILD, WILD PLANET and WAR OF THE…

    THE ARCHIVIST Volume XV: Insane Italian Sci-Fi Adventures With WILD, WILD PLANET and WAR OF THE…

    Welcome to the Archive. Following the infamous “Format Wars” (R.I.P. VHS), a multitude of films found themselves in danger of being forgotten forever due to their admittedly niche appeal. Thankfully, Warner Bros. established the Archive Collection, a Disc On Demand and Streaming service devoted to some of the more idiosyncratic pieces of cinema ever made. Being big fans of the label, we here at Cinapse thought it prudent to establish a column devoted to these unusual gems. Thus “The Archivist” was born — a biweekly look at some of the best, boldest and most batshit motion pictures the Shield has to offer. Some of these will be recent additions to the collection, while others will be titles that have been available for awhile. With over 1,500 pictures procurable on Warner Archive (and more being added every month), there’s no possible way we’ll get to all of them. But trust me when we say we’re sure going to try.

    Welcome back, you sexy astronomers! It’s time to venture (far) out into the final frontier with a couple low-budget science fiction pseudo-classics in this installment of The Archivist! B-movie maestro, Antonio Margheriti (Anthony M. Dawson on American screens) made a most insane stateside cinematic invasion with two back-to-back campy romps featuring the adventures of Commander Mike Halstead. He and his scrappy team of officers defend The 1960s Of The Future against whacky conquerors from within and without.

    A scientist attempts to create a “perfect” race of human hybrids by any means necessary.

    It is a rule too often observed that older films couldn’t live up to their vibrant and enticing poster artwork. Wild, Wild Planet isn’t quite an exception to that rule, but it comes awfully close. The poster boasts a wealth of action that, from the opening credits, we can tell couldn’t possibly be delivered by its modest production values. That being said, that measly budget does provide a lot of colorful whimsy, charm, and laughs. Amongst the endless library of B pictures from the classical era, this is in that much smaller category of goofy films completely worth your time. Sometimes, you just want to watch something that will make you smile.

    I found myself grinning ear to ear for nearly every second of this lively and ambitious little movie. I have seen plenty of Italian genre films before this, so I was prepared for sub-standard ADR. But nothing could have prepared me for the screenwriters’ apparently sub-standard acquaintance with the English language. One of the film’s greatest joys materializes in the form of dialogue that just isn’t… right. After only a few minutes of conversation between some chief cast members, I tried to remember if I had hit my head or something. It’s not complete nonsense, and there are a few moments of genuinely witty exchange, but about every five minutes, somebody says something that is just a couple steps to the left of correct. Be prepared to be audibly asking the empty darkness in which you view the film, “What the hell?”

    Many aspects of the film will inspire such a question, but the material that does make sense should carry you through the confusion. The special effects are, indeed, strung together on the lowest of budgets (think Thunderbirds), but are coherent, and often surprisingly effective! The film ends with a giant underground bunker flooding with about one million gallons of blood (yeah, it hella-goes-there), and somehow watching a bunch of miniature sets populated with stiff doll stand-ins be destroyed by slow-motion kool-aid really grossed me out. Between its adorable effects work, a couple sincerely kick ass fight scenes, and one of the earliest performances from Franco Nero, this movie makes for some supremely nerdy fun.

    A gas-like alien species threatens to possess the entire human population for nefarious purposes.

    War Of The Planets, (maybe shot at the same time as its predecessor — they were released the same year and look exactly the same) is a shockingly different film. The light and swinging vibe found in the previous picture has been abandoned, and the result is a film with the same cheap quality, that desperately tries to hold up a spare plot, with a darker tone and no dramatic propulsion.

    Although I have to admit the work on both of these films largely demonstrate poor filmmaking, some credit is due for crafty shooting and editing. Many scenes would easily provide thrills if only we could possibly take the movie seriously enough to invest in its characters. Quick cuts, intense close-ups, and disturbing soundscapes do all they can, but by the time the movie is ready to make us jump or scream or feel for a character in trouble, it has already unintentionally caused us to laugh too many times to respond to its sudden visceral evocations.

    For the most part, however, both films make for interesting viewing. Just as I can understand why Warner Brothers sees these works fit for preservation, I see how Margheriti developed a reputation for “working wonders” on a barely-there budget. I would like to know just how little money he had. He created rather detailed worlds with a willing and energetic cast, and showed this steadfast cinephile a handful of things he had never seen before. That’s got to count for something, right?

    So laser blast an ice-cold juice capsule, and orbit a bowl of popcorn. It’s double-feature time!

  • 2015 Kansas City Japanese Film Festival

    2015 Kansas City Japanese Film Festival

    Last year I attended the Kansas City Japanese Film festival for the first time, and with a solid lineup of films it turned out to be my favorite local film events, as well as one of my first articles for Cinapse. So this year I couldn’t wait to attend again but the timing conflicted with our own film event in Austin, NYC is Effed. As it turned out, weather kept me local. This was immensely disappointing but with a silver lining — I once again got to head to the Kansas City Alamo Drafthouse for an afternoon of Nihon-no Eiga.

    As in previous years, proceeds from event admissions benefit the Taylor Anderson Memorial Fund to create English reading rooms and educational programs in the tsunami-affected Tohoku region of Japan. The fund is named in honor of an American teacher in the JET program whose life was lost in the tsunami of 2011.

    (Note: Due to time constraints I actually couldn’t attend the entire festival, managing to catch only the two middle entries. I have seen all four films in the lineup, though.)

    The Hidden Fortress (1958)
    Director: Akira Kurosawa

    A pair of bumbling peasants caught up in a feudal war flee from battle and get pulled into a series of escalating adventures that they don’t understand. They cross paths with a fierce and mysterious warrior who invites them to join him, along with his female traveling companion, on a quest for gold bullion which was lost in the battle. What they don’t realize is that their new partners are the displaced princess and her most trusted general.

    The film is well known for its influence on Star Wars, and is certainly required watching for fans. The peasants, one short and one tall, are peripheral to the events but caught in the middle of them, much like droids R2-D2 and C-3PO, and Leia can be traced to Kurosawa’s feisty rebel princess. Some other similarities include early scenes set in a rocky landscape, a friend returning to stage a last-second rescue, and a closing throne room scene in which the protagonists are rewarded for their efforts.

    Pom Poko (1994)
    Director: Isao Takahata

    When encroaching urban development endangers wild habitat of tanuki (Japanese raccoon) colonies, they must forget their animalistic territorial disputes and band together against the threat of humans.

    Those who are only familiar with Studio Ghibli’s films directed by Hayao Miyazaki may be surprised that Pom Poko’s visual style is much more eclectic. Rather than sticking directly to a consistently realistic look, it includes both ultra-realistic and very cartoony elements, in service to the imaginative plot. In Japanese folklore, tanukis are said to have powers of disguise and transformation (another pop culture example of this is Super Mario Bros 3’s Tanooki Suit, which allows the player to transform into a statue). In the film, this ability allows the tanukis not only to switch between realistic and cartoony forms, but to transform into objects and other animals. The most skilled among them can even live among humans.

    The film is really quite a lot darker than I expected, with some melancholy themes and a resolution that’s bittersweet at best. While it clearly has some strong environmental themes, they serve the plot and are authentic rather than overtly preachy (unlike that stinker The Lorax).

    Uzumasa Limelight (2014)
    Director: Ken Ochiai

    For many, this new film was likely the outlier in a group of well known classics — new in 2014 and unseen by nearly everyone. The film was selected by Michael Bugajski, President of the Heartland JET Alumni Association. Michael briefly introduced the film and mentioned its relationship to Charlie Chaplin’s Limelight. Both films feature an aging entertainer who takes on a young female protégé. In Uzumasu’s case, it’s Seizô Fukumoto who plays the lead: Seiichi Kamiyama, a veteran kirare-yaku (an actor who specializes in death scenes in samurai films). Appropriately, Fukumoto himself has been such an actor for nearly 50 years, and Uzumasa Limelight is his first starring role at 71. He plays the role with bruised dignity and quiet courage that makes him endearing to the audience.

    The movie has a shot-on-video appearance that looks cheap and television-like, but what appears to be low-budget artificiality is actually an interesting stylization. The in-movie film scenes take on a more film-like appearance, creating two planes of fiction, each with their own look.

    Rashomon (1950)
    Director: Akira Kurosawa

    When a man is killed, and his wife raped, the conflicting stories put forth in the ensuing hearing each tell wildly different versions of the events. Emphasizing the inherent bias of perception and unreliability of eyewitness testimony, the story has become such a common part of our film language that it’s constantly referenced and repeated in popular media. Courtroom dramas in particular bear Rashomon a great debt for setting the template for such storytelling. Generally considered one of Kurosawa’s masterpieces, the film is also notable for marking the debut of Toshiro Mifune, who would go on to become one of Japan’s most celebrated actors, collaborating with Kurosawa on many films.

    For me, it’s not until the final moments of the film that it really all comes together. I won’t spoil it for anyone who hasn’t seen it, but the final interaction of the woodcutter and priest moved me greatly and elevated a good film to a great one.

    With another great lineup of film selections, the Japanese Film fest was once again a great time at the movies with a mix of classic and contemporary, live action and animated films. Thanks again to the sponsors who made this event possible:
    Heartland JET Alumni Association
    Kansas City Art Institute
    Heart of America Japan-America-Society
    Consulate General of Japan at Chicago

    A/V Out.

  • THE ARCHIVIST Volume XIV: Jagger Struts In FREEJACK [1992] and PERFORMANCE [1970]

    THE ARCHIVIST Volume XIV: Jagger Struts In FREEJACK [1992] and PERFORMANCE [1970]

    Welcome to the Archive. Following the infamous “Format Wars” (R.I.P. VHS), a multitude of films found themselves in danger of being forgotten forever due to their admittedly niche appeal. Thankfully, Warner Bros. established the Archive Collection, a Disc On Demand and Streaming service devoted to some of the more idiosyncratic pieces of cinema ever made. Being big fans of the label, we here at Cinapse thought it prudent to establish a column devoted to these unusual gems. Thus “The Archivist” was born — a biweekly look at some of the best, boldest and most batshit motion pictures the Shield has to offer. Some of these will be recent additions to the collection, while others will be titles that have been available for awhile. With over 1,500 pictures procurable on Warner Archive (and more being added every month), there’s no possible way we’ll get to all of them. But trust me when we say we’re sure going to try.

    Hey all you mad wild babies! Welcome back to The Archivist. I continue to learn my Roman Numerals, and you continue to learn about the endless Warner Brothers back-catalogue of cinematic wonders! This week’s installment finds the gyrating wonder, Mick Jagger, as you might have never seen him before! With Die Antwoord’s actorial debut apparently coming up short in Chappie, I thought it appropriate to check out another musician stretching a pair of thespian wings. Jagger exercised his respectable acting chops in a handful of diverse films, and The W.B. Archives offers two very cool movies from his sparse film career. I can’t tell you how excited I am to tell you about one of them (although, they are both pretty great).

    In Freejack, Emilio Estevez (looking so baby-faced, I would sooner believe him as the Mighty Ducks’ team captain, than head coach) plays a promising F1 racer who is sucked out of his own timeline and into the future (2009…Ha! Stupid movie! That’s already the past, losers!), where the super rich live inside a giant fence and can store their minds in a giant computer just long enough to be placed in some poor schmuck’s body from the past before they truly die. It’s based on a Robert Sheckley novel called Immortality INC., and that source material was apparently butchered in favor of several car chases and other shenanigans. It’s admittedly a poor film, but it shouldn’t be forgotten. I can understand its obscurity considering it came out in 1992, in the wake of icons like Basic Instinct, A Few Good Men, and Batman Returns, but it has an interesting place in the early ’90s Cyber Punk fascination. It also earns points for being a time travel movie whose premise allows for the protagonist to tell supporting characters who he is without the tedious rigors of convincing everyone he is not insane. People understand his highly dangerous situation (in what has become a way of life for them) as soon as he explains, and their reactions are always thrilling.

    Mick Jagger doesn’t capture a ton of screen time in this one. He plays a mercenary who, even after being fired, insists on capturing Estevez’s character. His character is a lot of fun, and Jagger seems to be treating his character with no more care than the director did with the rest of the production. He phones it in with just enough charm to strike a smile or two. It’s just fun to see him do his thing, as an appealing character, especially in a squeaky pair of leather pants.

    Speaking of which, the movie is kinda goofy. Estevez doesn’t quite sell the one-liners they fed him with the same bravado of the muscle-bound action stars of the day, and considering the script’s shallowness, the action isn’t quite exciting enough to…excite. It does offer some fun production design, and if you are a science fiction diehard, its well-worth your time, in spite of itself.

    God…where the hell to start with tonight’s B picture (which is really the A picture)…

    Performance chaotically intertwines the lives of Chas (James Fox), a ferocious London mafia enforcer, and Turner (Mick Jagger), a reclusive, disenchanted rock star. Chas is looking for an escape from his soured mafia ties, and Turner is looking to reconnect with his “demon” in order to recharge his songwriting energies. After Jagger’s character makes his mid-film entrance, they play a lot of dress-up, do a lot of bathing, and have a lot of sex (Turner had been in the middle of a ménage à trois). The dream can’t last forever, and after the two engage in a lengthy tug of war between their identities…something happens.

    The movie opens with a bombastic torrent of exposition. The editing featured in the first 20 minutes is so overwhelming, I was almost too exhausted to continue. I’m not trying to scare you away from this experience in telling you that. I am trying to prepare you for a movie I think everyone needs to see. It may be challenging, but it is every bit as rewarding as long as you are willing to give yourself over to a movie that is just as much art as it is pure entertainment. It is a true work of cinema; one that tells you even more in its cinematography and editing than it does with its dialogue, and still manages to leave room for enough style to do nothing but exhilarate. Every moment of the movie’s time is filled with something provocative and engaging.

    I had to routinely remind myself I was watching something from The Warner Archives, and not a lost classic picked up by one of our boutique labels. No offense to the other films I’ve covered for this column, but it seems like the majority of the titles under the Archive Collection label have been a few frames short of quality, rather than a few frames short of genius. I’ve had a lot of fun digging into their under appreciated works, but I have never been so thrilled by a movie in the catalogue thus far.

    I won’t accept anyone telling me I only loved this movie for it being full of boobs and violence, either. Sure, Anita Pallenberg’s scantily-clad presence as a kind of antagonistic bohemian spiritual sex guru to James Fox’s character might be appealing, but it’s the dense feverishness of the film’s art that will stick with me forever. Besides, you need her in a movie constantly challenging gender and sexual identity with Jagger (and another character…who is hard to explain) being such an androgynous force of nature. This movie is the most complicated look at the “sex, drugs, and rock and roll generation,” and it blows Easy Rider right out of the water, from both a filmmaking standpoint and as an artistic representation of that time and place.

    It also invented the music video. It features a music sequence, complete with a fantastic original song by Mick Jagger, yet had it come out in the ’90s, critics would have pooped on the entire movie’s frenetic style for its use of “the MTV edit.”

    I need to stop…just see the damn thing. Jagger’s performance really shines…every performance does, and this Blu-ray release offers a few cool special features too, a rarity among Archive products.

    So save yourself from being possessed by a dying rich guy, and have a mushroom trip in the key of Mick Jagger.

    It’s double-feature time!

  • THE ARCHIVIST VOLUME XIII — Failed Comic Book Adaptations: THE SPIRIT [1986] and STEEL [1997]

    THE ARCHIVIST VOLUME XIII — Failed Comic Book Adaptations: THE SPIRIT [1986] and STEEL [1997]

    Welcome to the Archive. Following the infamous “Format Wars” (R.I.P. VHS), a multitude of films found themselves in danger of being forgotten forever due to their admittedly niche appeal. Thankfully, Warner Bros. established the Archive Collection, a Disc On Demand and Streaming service devoted to some of the more idiosyncratic pieces of cinema ever made. Being big fans of the label, we here at Cinapse thought it prudent to establish a column devoted to these unusual gems. Thus “The Archivist” was born — a biweekly look at some of the best, boldest and most batshit motion pictures the Shield has to offer. Some of these will be recent additions to the collection, while others will be titles that have been available for awhile. With over 1,500 pictures procurable on Warner Archive (and more being added every month), there’s no possible way we’ll get to all of them. But trust me when we say we’re sure going to try.

    Welcome back, vigilantes, to an action-packed installment of The Archivist! Today, superheroes are everywhere. Their exploits can be seen on any size screen in nearly any locale. They are major moneymaking machines in filmed entertainments and also profitable in every sort of merchandising. They are plastered on apparel, phone cases, backpacks and purses, and practically anything else you could want. Did you look in your ass, lately? You probably have one in your ass. The Atom would be my first guess.

    Yes, the original creations of the comic book realm are now more prolific and popular than ever, but even as recently as 1997, producers of film and television still didn’t really know what to do with them. Tim Burton had great success with a Batman franchise, and Superman had also performed well, but sometimes Quincy Jones gets in the mix and things start to go off the wall.

    Let me explain…

    First, let’s get through the good. Superheroes had often flourished on TV, but in 1986, when Sam Jones (Flash Gordon) donned the blue suit and matching fedora/mask combo for an extra-long pilot of The Spirit, nobody seemed to care. I had a rough go of researching this one. It doesn’t even have so much as a Wikipedia article to clue us in to the production history, so that means I won’t be able to tell you about all that stuff only I find interesting. Sorry! I suppose I could tell you a little about the movie itself, though.

    Detective Denny Colt is investigating the murder of an old friend when a thug connected to his friend’s killer guns him down. Thought to be dead, Denny takes on the persona of The Spirit, only revealing himself to the police commissioner. He starts kicking all the right asses, makes a name for himself, and works his way toward solving the mystery that set him on this dangerous path.

    Don’t be fooled by the low-res images I’ve included in the article. The DVD actually looks quite good considering this is a TV movie from the 80s. I am thankful for that, because this pilot has so much promise, I’m surprised it wasn’t picked up for a series. They were shooting for pure comic book glee with this one, and from the art direction to the performances, the whole thing strikes the same adorable tone. It’s full of funny gags, zippy dialogue, and more vibrant color than you could fit into Frank Zappa’s best acid trip. At a super slim running time of 69 minutes, the movie practically overflows with low-budget appeal. It’s a lot of fun and you should check it out, especially if you were lost or burned watching Frank Miller’s bafflingly dull and unfaithful adaptation from 2008.

    Phallus much?

    About ten years after The Spirit tried his hand at television, Shaquille O’Neal tried his hand at acting… again. Did you ever see a movie called Blue Chips? He was in that, too, and he was good! Shaq can aqt! So what the hell happened two years later when he infamously made an ass of himself in Kazaam? What the hell else happened just one year after that when he decided to take on a butchered adaptation of a DC comic book character? Something about moving to the Lakers must have given him a serious confidence boost (I mean… duh). Sometimes you just can’t stop until you get enough.

    John Henry Irons (Shaquille O’Neal) is happily creating “non-lethal” weapons for the American military with his best buddy, Sparks (Annabeth Gish) and obvious maniac, Nathanial Burke (Judd Nelson), when Burke takes a weapon past its tested abilities to impress a senator. Sparky is crushed and crippled, and all three inventors are disgraced and leave the army. Irons, who lives in a wide-open scrap yard in a bad neighborhood in L.A., discovers some of his weapons technology has fallen into the hands of local gangs. He teams up with wheelchair-bound Sparky, takes a look at the man in the mirror, lets Sparky know she is not alone, and the two of them use scrap metal to create armor, computers, and enough advanced weaponry to tell the gangs they should beat it.

    Taken from a very cool storyline in the Death of Superman era, Steel has almost nothing to do with its source material. Normally, that would be fine. It is apparently human nature to take something and make it your own. In this instance, it was the inspiration of Quincy Jones (producer/collaborator on Michael Jackson’s classic albums) that might have led this film astray. His intentions were noble. He felt children didn’t look to the future with positivity. I’m not sure how this ridiculous movie could change that, but I’m sure that’s just the way it made him feel.

    The movie is a mess. It tries to strike the goofiest “Tee hee, crime fighting is fun! Smoking is bad!” tone, while employing “streetwise” dialogue with as much PG-13 profanity as possible. For whom did they make this movie? The dialogue is at its most troubling when only African American characters populate a scene. It sounds like a white guy took a bunch of overheard speech patterns and injected them into the script at random. Apparently… that’s actually what happened. Writer/director Kenneth Johnson visited an inner city school in order to get the conversations “right”. Who knows, maybe with better actors, the script would work fine, but with Shaq demonstrating all the magnetism of Michael Jordan in Space Jam, the language sounds forced and awkward. Add to that extremely boring action sequences, the most uncomfortable Richard Roundtree reference imaginable, and a predictable story made up of elements borrowed from previously released action movies, and this movie becomes really hard to recommend. I want to say you have to see it to believe it, but then you would have to see it.

    Look, the whole point of The Archivist is to dig up the most nerdy cinematic discoveries possible, and if you want to see two failed superhero properties from a time when you could actually fail making a comic book movie, then these two movies make great companion pieces.

    So fake your own death, and blacksmith yourself some seven-foot-tall body armor! It’s double-feature time!

  • THE DISAPPEARANCE OF ELEANOR RIGBY: All You Need is Love (And Patience)

    THE DISAPPEARANCE OF ELEANOR RIGBY: All You Need is Love (And Patience)

    Initially shown as a two-part double feature, The Disappearance of Eleanor Rigby: Him focuses on Conor (James McAvoy), an East Village barkeep piecing together what remains of his life after his wife, Eleanor, walks out on him after her attempted suicide. Likewise, Eleanor Rigby: Her follows Eleanor (Jessica Chastain) after her titular disappearance as she buries herself in college classes and suburban comforts in an attempt to distance herself from her life with Conor. As they cross narrative paths in fleeting moments, Conor and Eleanor are forced to painfully look back on the relationship they had and inevitably confront the tragedy that drove them apart. While the films’ order of exhibition alternated throughout their festival run, the total experience was an intimate yet heartbreakingly epic one, with an emotional power as overwhelming as its three-hour runtime.

    For its theatrical release, however, Benson worked with distributor The Weinstein Company to combine both Him and Her into a truncated film entitled Them. Them uses both perspectives to grant the viewer an omniscient view of the story… albeit, as noted by some critics, at the cost of the film’s original conceit. In an unusual move, Weinstein showcases both cuts of the film on a two-disc Blu-ray, released earlier this February. The resulting dilemma is, expectedly, “which version do I watch?” However, my recent marathon of all three films has led me to believe that not only is the answer more complicated than I once thought–but that it may be the wrong question to ask altogether.

    While Him and Her’s split narrative may seem gimmicky at first glance, it is how writer-director Ned Benson uses this conceit to his advantage that makes The Disappearance Of Eleanor Rigby such a memorable experience. The look and feel of each film differs according to its protagonists; Him takes on a static, cold look to mirror Conor’s increasing loneliness while Her’s looser, more handheld camerawork and bright, warm tones externalizes Eleanor’s frenzied yet driven attitude towards her new life. “His movie is all about moving forward — don’t stop, because otherwise I’m going to feel something — and when she comes into his life, he has to feel something,” Benson explains in an interview with The Moveable Feast. In regards to Her, “the character is much more interior in dealing with more emotional issues…I [shot] her film handheld except when he comes into her movie, when I go more static, and study him, because he is the baseline to her life. He’s the constant or the certainty in her life and once she’s left that, she’s completely uncertain in terms of her identity and trying to re-scope who she is.” There are also moments where Him and Her narratively dovetail, but much like the film’s production design, the content of these scenes diverge depending on which character is the focus. Conor’s perspective tends to paint him more as a heart-on-his-sleeve romantic hero, with Eleanor as strangely withholding and emotionless; Eleanor’s perspective, on the other hand, reveals a woman more close-guarded with her emotions, trying to figure out the best way to express herself when faced with Conor’s more bullish, headstrong nature.

    The contrasting aesthetic and narrative qualities of Him and Her not only establishes a distinct identity for each film, but also deepens how isolated the characters — and their respective films — feel from each other. Because the world in Eleanor Rigby changes depending on who the film focuses on, the opposing protagonist isn’t the same character featured in the opposite film; to Conor, Eleanor isn’t Eleanor, and vice versa. Rather, like everything else making up his or her world, their love interest is merely how they perceive them to be. This results in a frustrating yet beautiful love story in which these two characters both long for each other’s understanding and compassion, yet lack the ability to see the world in any other way but their own. This limitation extends to the film’s audience, who is granted the ability to see both sides of the story, but in their mute spectator role cannot grant the same ability to the characters they empathize with.

    It’s this remarkable effect of pathos that makes creating a cut like Them such a problem to begin with. In assembling Them, Benson didn’t face just the problem of which scenes to include, but a staggering ripple effect afterwards. Selecting certain scenes meant that other scenes featuring the same wardrobe or production design had to be included to ensure continuity, at times prizing one character’s perspective over another. Color timing and signifiers meant to distinguish between characters’ viewpoints become tangible rather than aesthetic decisions. In creating a standalone film synthesized from two differing perspectives, individual perception is forced to become objective truth.

    As a result, much of Them feels tonally uneven, its characters slight. Eleanor’s quiet, introspective journey feels sluggish compared to Conor’s more active and headstrong quest to win back his lost love; at the same time, Eleanor feels more mature and developed than Conor’s boyish lonely-heart as she struggles to reconcile her drive to escape her tragic past with the consequences of the necessary actions she’s taken. When compared to the rich, detailed world of Him and Her, it’s hard not to feel cheated at times by Them — it’s the same story, to be sure, but you cannot shake the feeling of something greater existing beyond the boundaries of its frame.

    However, I cannot doubt that something magical happens in intertwining Conor and Eleanor’s journeys. They may occupy their own separate lives at times, but Them argues that this does not mean their worlds are mutually exclusive from one another. In watching these two lovers run from heartbreak only to snap back towards each other like karmic rubber bands, Benson reveals how much Conor and Eleanor’s lives work in tandem. Despite their feelings for their partners, Conor and Eleanor remain impenetrable ciphers to each other, dancing closer to reconciliation only to break away when painful memories come back to haunt them, or when earnest actions register as threats. They could make this work–something inside them refuses to deny it–but the only ones holding Eleanor and Conor back are themselves.

    This problem isn’t limited to just them, either. In the film, Professor Friedman (Viola Davis) lectures about how we have derived a sense of uniqueness or identity from our individual perception of the world. This belief, however, creates a mental solitude that inhibits our attempts to understand those around us; comprehending and accepting someone’s irrational behavior requires admitting the fallibility of our initial perceptions. As much as the characters in Rigby want to solve each other’s problems, they must also reckon with the limitations of their own understanding over the course of the film. Conor and his father Spencer (Ciaran Hinds) can only talk around their suffering with a bemused stoicism, or compare the relative weight of each other’s marital drama as if it were a contest in un-masculinity. Julian (William Hurt) attempts to “outsource” necessary discussions with Eleanor to a psychiatrist colleague because, despite being her father, he doesn’t feel qualified to help her; “Tragedy is a foreign country,” Julian mutters, explaining to himself as much as he is to Eleanor. “We don’t know how to talk to the natives.” Where Him and Her are about how confining individual perspectives can be, Them explores how humanity as a whole seems to have lost the ability to communicate as a result of this self-imposed isolation.

    What unites all three films is the hope that developing meaningful relationships may help us overcome our perceptual limitations. Even more, that we seem to be hard-wired to seek out these relationships even as we cling to comforting yet flawed beliefs. Conor desperately seeks out family and friends’ explanations for Eleanor’s behavior in order to win her back; this forces Conor to reckon with his own refusal to deal with their tragic past, and he recognizes his headstrong, confident persona as a mask for his own emotional immaturity. Likewise, Eleanor’s drive to move beyond her relationship with Conor stumbles when the important people in her life refuse to follow in her footsteps. Akin to Juliette Binoche in Three Colors: Blue, Eleanor discovers that she cannot escape the memories of her traumatic past, for they are her sole motive for forging a different, better future. As a result, she inevitably finds herself confronting the very man she’s trying to forget. While both characters begin with a primarily individualistic worldview, they find they cannot move forward or grow without the thoughts and ideas of others. Despite Conor and Eleanor remaining in opposite emotional states at the conclusions of their respective films, all three films share the idea that there is still room for them to grow and find peace–as well as the hope that their paths will soon cross again.

    Through retiming Him and Her’s color palate, Benson extends this theme to Them’s overall color scheme. “I keep those disparate color palettes in the beginning, and as the film went on, and as they sort of slowly re-found each other, I try and synthesize those color palettes a little bit…[so that] the last scene of the movie is a blend of it all,” Benson explained in an interview with Coming Soon on Them’s editing process. Rigby’s separate films effectively dramatize the protagonists’ point of views; Them takes this one step further and suggests that the more Conor and Eleanor open up themselves to change, their inner and outer worlds reach a desired (and very much necessary) equilibrium.

    It’s easy to write off Them as a mere combination of two films that are strong on their own, since much of what makes Him and Her so effective — the differing versions of scenes, the attention to detail in each film’s contrasting production design and camerawork — are all pretty much done away with when placed in the framework of a conventional narrative. I mean, the very idea of smashing these two films together seems so frustratingly logical that it’s almost comical. It speaks to a long-standing belief in an omniscient form of storytelling where morality and consequence are as clear-cut as the characters experiencing them. That events only happened the way they happened, not as we remembered them. That the world as we see it is, in fact, the world that is. Him and Her certainly recognize that this isn’t the case, so anything less than that must, as a result, be an inherently inferior work. I certainly wanted to believe this was the case, and I initially did–it was the reason why I refused to see Them during its Austin run last September, and it was why I was hesitant to even watch it for this article.

    But I can’t defend this idea anymore. Pitting Conor and Eleanor’s perspectives against each other creates such a natural visual and narrative dialogue that cannot be found by solely watching Him and Her. Intercutting the two stories may create a more linear, straightforward telling of the story more akin to traditional narrative film, but Them still feels like two clashing perspectives eventually reaching a middle ground rather than a wholly omniscient view of its subjects. Granted, the film does suffer by having to make the impossible choice between which versions of scenes it chooses to include, but that’s exactly why Them should be considered part of the experience of The Disappearance Of Eleanor Rigby rather than an alternative to Him and Her. While the two films may support the idea that Conor and Eleanor live in different worlds, Them shows how selfish and confining this idea can be–all while using the same footage as its progenitors.

    At the same time, the experience of watching Them made me further appreciate the amount of care and detail put into the visual and storytelling qualities that differentiate Him and Her from each other. There’s an element of discovery and beauty in the experience of watching each version of the film, and is truly the best expression of what all three cuts are trying to achieve. It’s not enough to settle for one cut; to do so would defeat the purpose. While it may feel like you’re watching the same material over and over (and yes, you are), I can assure you that it’s never in the same light.

    It’s uncomfortable to lack a sense of moral surety or objectivism. We would like to neatly compartmentalize the world and believe that things are as we see them. We hate being wrong. Or, at the very least, not being correct on the first go around. But a triad like Eleanor Rigby suggests that not only is this mode of thought the most painful and confining aspect of our existence, it is the main thing holding us back from forming meaningful relationships with others. It is through experiencing the world through as many eyes as possible that makes it possible to transcend and question our initial beliefs or expectations; hopefully, through that, we can find our way towards a better future. We may succeed, we may fail. At the very least, we wouldn’t be alone in trying.

  • THE ARCHIVIST VOLUME XII: Where My Tribe At? THE CLAN OF THE CAVE BEAR [1985] and GREYSTOKE [1983]

    THE ARCHIVIST VOLUME XII: Where My Tribe At? THE CLAN OF THE CAVE BEAR [1985] and GREYSTOKE [1983]

    Welcome to the Archive. Following the infamous “Format Wars” (R.I.P. VHS), a multitude of films found themselves in danger of being forgotten forever due to their admittedly niche appeal. Thankfully, Warner Bros. established the Archive Collection, a Disc On Demand and Streaming service devoted to some of the more idiosyncratic pieces of cinema ever made. Being big fans of the label, we here at Cinapse thought it prudent to establish a column devoted to these unusual gems. Thus “The Archivist” was born — a biweekly look at some of the best, boldest and most batshit motion pictures the Shield has to offer. Some of these will be recent additions to the collection, while others will be titles that have been available for awhile. With over 1,500 pictures procurable on Warner Archive (and more being added every month), there’s no possible way we’ll get to all of them. But trust me when we say we’re sure going to try.

    Come as you are: Neanderthals, Cro-Magnons, Ape-People, and People-People! All are welcome here, at The Archivist! Maybe you’re having trouble finding your place? Maybe you’re experiencing an identity crisis? Valentine’s Day has come and gone. Maybe you’re looking for love in all the wrong places? Maybe your most promising suitor’s head was torn off by a famous bear? If you are experiencing any of the above, this week’s edition of cinematic spelunking was hand-selected just for you!

    When I chose The Clan of the Cave Bear and Greystoke: The Legend of Tarzan, Lord of the Apes, I had no idea what perfect companion pieces they would make. They both covered the subject of fitting into unfamiliar societies, and they both had seemingly endless titles. That’s really all I knew. What a surprise when it turned out they could hardly be more fascinating when they were viewed in the same evening!

    The Clan…OTCB stars the quite talented Daryl Hannah as Ayla, a Cro-Magnon (the species of humanoid ancestors from which most of us evolved) who, at a very young age, is half-dead and alone after losing her mother in one hell of an earthquake. A tribe of Neanderthals happens upon her, and although their leaders are reluctant, a loving couple is allowed to adopt her. Ayla must now find her place in this world of less evolved and brutally stubborn people.

    The movie plays, unintentionally (?), like a socio-political allegory. At every turn, Ayla is beaten physically and emotionally by the more superstitious and xenophobic members of her new tribe. As it turns out, what became of the Neanderthal is no mystery at all. Most of them survived and became conservative legislators. Women have an oppressively small role in their society. Outsiders are feared, and Ayla’s very existence will apparently anger their gods. She really pisses them off when she reveals her unmatched skills with weaponry while saving the life of a child. Several moments like that one had me thinking this might be a great female empowerment film, or maybe even a fine feminist piece, but the movie is staunchly determined to conclude that these people absolutely cannot coexist.

    This is a thoroughly intriguing film that just can’t help but trip over its own goofiness. The Neanderthal make-up, though nominated for an academy award, hasn’t aged well, and is hard to take seriously at first. The score, by the great Alan Silvestri, also falls surprisingly short, as its synth sounds awkwardly bump heads with lovely prehistoric images. I have to say, this is never-the-less a film you have to track down just so you can be in awe of how daring it is. To make a movie in 1985 with sparse dialogue mostly consisting of vague hand-gestures translated in subtitles is one thing, but to use that entirely fictional language to tell a story about a time so many religious people reject (even today) is entirely another. Plus, it was one of Bart The Bear’s (The Edge, The Great Outdoors) first movies. You go, Warner Brothers!

    Now, from goofy, to crazy. Greystoke: TLOT, LOFTA delivers (or so it claims) the most faithful adaptation of Edgar Rice Burroughs’ novel Tarzan of the Apes. That is apparently dubious, but it does tell an incredible version of the often-filmed tale. John Clayton (played by Christopher Lambert, who is never once referred to as “Tarzan”) is the son of a marooned couple who die not long after his birth. He is adopted by a female gorilla and spends many naked years desperately trying to find himself among his animal family until a party of British zoologists discovers him. By that time, he has become a man, now way less naked than before (maybe Lambert had a no-nude contract), and is the “lord” of his tribe of gorillas. He agrees to leave the only world he has known, and he and Ian Holm return to England to live at the Greystoke Estate with his only remaining relative, his grandfather (played by Sir Ralph Richardson in his final role). There, his identity crisis only worsens, particularly after falling in love with a human woman (Andie MacDowell). Despite a lot of visual splendor (including astonishing make-up effects by the great Rick Baker), and excellent performances, this movie is a crazy mess, and that can mostly be attributed to the shenanigans going on behind the scenes.

    The screenplay was written by Robert Towne! Chinatown Robert Towne! Script doctor of Bonnie and Clyde and The Godfather Robert Towne! Too bad he was fired before he could direct Greystoke. Apparently the commercial failure of his most recently written and directed film Personal Best lost him the job. He retaliated in officially replacing his name with that of his dog. That’s right. Robert Towne’s dog received whole credit for writing this script. With all that slobber on the pages, rewrites must have been a bitch. Strike one.

    The film was placed in the capable hands of Hugh Hudson (Chariots of Fire), who apparently wasn’t big on restraint when he took over the project. As I mentioned before, Rick Baker’s ape suits are jaw-droppingly detailed and they found some convincing players to fill them, but do we really need to see a mother carrying around a dead ape baby like broken toy? Do we need to see the same mother’s teat dripping with milk while she tries to feed that dead offspring? These harsh realities would be worth showing if they were treated with some delicacy, but the images are thrown at us with the same carelessness this mother gives her dead ape after she finds young John Clayton. Strike two.

    Fortunately, there isn’t a strike three (although Andie McDowell’s every line being ADR’d by Glenn Close is pretty weird). This movie might have problems so big as to force the viewer to laugh unintentionally, but it is so full of gorgeous shots, strong acting, fascinating ideas, and bizarre moments, you just can’t stop watching it. I was especially pleased with the film’s lead. Believe it or not, a few years before he was a snickering Scottish guy with a samurai sword, and several more years before he was a snickering guy with lightning coming out of his eyes, Christopher Lambert was a promising young actor. He seems to be in another, better organized drama. He still snickers a couple times, but I think his performance could have been something really special in a movie that didn’t wind up with such an indifferent anti-climax after a long trek through a lot of strangeness.

    I could go on, but then again, so could you…like…with that whole “life” thing you have.

    Another pair of must-see films from the depths of Hollywood’s historical jungle, and you can practically only get them from one place: The Warner Archives!

    Now find fit yourself into a society of popcorn and beer! It’s

  • The Archivist Volume XI: Gene Roddenberry’s lost TV Pilots — GENESIS II [1973], PLANET EARTH [1974]…

    The Archivist Volume XI: Gene Roddenberry’s lost TV Pilots — GENESIS II [1973], PLANET EARTH [1974]…

    Welcome to the Archive. Following the infamous “Format Wars” (R.I.P. VHS), a multitude of films found themselves in danger of being forgotten forever due to their admittedly niche appeal. Thankfully, Warner Bros. established the Archive Collection, a Disc On Demand and Streaming service devoted to some of the more idiosyncratic pieces of cinema ever made. Being big fans of the label, we here at Cinapse thought it prudent to establish a column devoted to these unusual gems. Thus “The Archivist” was born — a biweekly look at some of the best, boldest and most batshit motion pictures the Shield has to offer. Some of these will be recent additions to the collection, while others will be titles that have been available for awhile. With over 1,500 pictures procurable on Warner Archive (and more being added every month), there’s no possible way we’ll get to all of them. But trust me when we say we’re sure going to try.

    Welcome back to The Archivist! Get ready to have your animation all suspended because I have a super-seventies sci-fi trip into the more-or-less super-seventies future! Three years in a row, the great Gene Roddenberry gave television a feature-length pilot episode in hopes of starting a new series. Sadly, all three were rejected by their chosen networks, but fear not kids, for with the bad news, must come some good. The Warner Archives, in its wisdom, offers the whole “trilogy” for its Disc-On-Demand service! Gene Rodenberry! Obscure low-budget sci-fi! It’s a nerd two-for-one! Hyphens!

    Genesis II

    It all began with mustachioed Alex Cord as Dylan Hunt: swaggering NASA astronaut, adventuring into infinite possibilities. Somewhere within the Carlsbad Caverns, he was leading a team of scientists on a mission to achieve suspended animation. As fun would have it, the pressurized chamber holding Mr. Hunt forces the unknown fault lines above to shift and buries he and his team for over a sesquicentenary (somebody got a thesaurus for Christmas!). Unearthed by explorers from the future society, PAX, and a deserter from a supreme race of mutated humans (sexy fallout from WWIII, apparently) known as Tyrannians, Dylan must work his way through lies, lust, and multiple navels to uncover the truth about these warring factions. Who is on the side of righteousness?

    It’s great! The filmmakers squeezed as much life into this thing as their clearly slim budget would allow. It has a lot of goofy charm, fun performances, and it achieves a fully fleshed-out vision of a new planet earth. The movie takes us on an adventure across new, but familiar terrain, and into new, but familiar conflicts. The Tyrannians need Hunt to repair their nuclear facility, but for what purpose? Do they need energy or weapons? Director John Llewellyn Moxey lives up to his surname in creating a surprisingly energetic movie, culminating in a cool climactic action sequence (at one point, they tackle a fucking horse), as well as a classic Roddenberry big-picture message about violence. Check it out.

    Planet Earth

    The next year, undaunted by his failure, Roddenberry returned, again with his protagonist, Dylan Hunt, and his new friends at PAX. This time, portrayed by the great character actor, John Saxon (Enter The Dragon, Nightmare on Elm Street), we get a better sense of what all could be done with this world in a TV series. Genesis II ended with such a sense of finality, that it might have felt like the entire story was over before it had hardly started. In Planet Earth, Dylan Hunt is now leading a team of PAX-onauts in exploring their new earth. Basically, it’s a small-scale Star Trek. They discover there are many societies all over the post-apocalyptic earth, including a matriarchy that has enslaved men.

    The movie has a lot of fun with this idea. Maybe too much fun is had, including a rather outdated view of the politics of women’s lib. This is the seventies, after all, and although his intentions were good, Rodenberry’s teleplay (co-written by Juanita Bartlett) can’t help but condescend a bit. After being captured by the female confederacy, Hunt must find a way to seduce his mistress. He romances her as they drink (don’t worry, it doesn’t go date-rapey) and he muses, “Women’s lib… men’s lib… how about people’s lib?”

    WHAT!? Man, as a sex, has never required liberation. Obviously, this woman-ruled settlement has taken social justice too far, and perverted it, but that line just reeks with deliberate misunderstanding. Sure, feminism was a little more militant back then, but over all, the plan in seeking gender equality was never about enslaving men. To suggest this “conquering woman” could be the future of women’s lib is completely ridiculous. Just the same, the movie manages to entertain.

    The costume department had a lot of fun making wacky, but appropriate attire for these powerful women. Plus, the cast rather naturally affected their performances with a great deal of power and stature within the matriarchy. They great Diana Muldaur (from both Star Trek TOS and DS9) takes the lead role among her co-stars with a particularly impressive realization of her character. She is strong, even brutish, but still somehow feminine and graceful. Watching her, one has to ponder what features and characteristics can be considered specifically masculine or feminine, and whether or not any of those characteristics matter (they don’t, of course). That should have been the central theme of this film all along. Without those useless physical distinctions, Patriarchy collapses.

    Strange New World

    Another year later, finally giving in, Gene Roddenberry sat out when Ronald F. Graham and Robert Butler took some of the concepts and imagery from Roddenberry’s two previous attempts and created Strange New World (a sly reference to the opening monologue from Star Trek). This time, John Saxon returned to do more dropkicking, but not as Dylan Hunt. Now, he is Anthony Vico, saved with two other astronauts in a cryo-sleep in outer space while asteroids pummeled the earth they knew. They return 180 years later to find a secret society which harvests organs from clones in order to live eternally. The movie devotes the majority of its time to exploring that world and when the team makes its exit, after what feels like the climax of the script, only to discover another world, it is hard to find the energy to stay focused. The two acts are shockingly uneven. The first half slowly moved in “suspense”, and the second moves at a much faster clip and focuses on action and a far more appealing idea.

    Vico and his team discover, hiding deep in the wilderness, tribal white trash! I’m not exaggerating. These people (all men) fear foreigners (“fornies”, they call them), live for huntin’ and trappin’, speak with a distinct southern drawl, and love weapons. As their foils, a group of tribal hippies (sort of) is also discovered. This faction has found a book detailing the laws of the Fish and Wildlife Services and adopted it as a bible. They live in what was once a zoo and now thrive in peace with the animals… they can even communicate with them. The NRA Vs. The EPA! It’s a beautifully goofy idea that would have made for wonderful satire, but this movie lacks the energy and structure to play well even as grounded science fiction. It just doesn’t live up to the fun or charm of its predecessors.

    On the whole, these three features are a real treasure. To have this glimpse at some lost Rodenberry work is exciting and rare, not to mention these three works contain the concepts and characters which lead eventually to the successful TV series Andromeda.

    Now wake your clone-ass up out of hibernation and discover some popcorn! It’s triple-feature time!

  • The Archivist Volume X: Steve Martin in Forgotten Funnies With THE MAN WITH TWO BRAINS [1983] and…

    The Archivist Volume X: Steve Martin in Forgotten Funnies With THE MAN WITH TWO BRAINS [1983] and…

    Welcome to the Archive. Following the infamous “Format Wars” (R.I.P. VHS), a multitude of films found themselves in danger of being forgotten forever due to their admittedly niche appeal. Thankfully, Warner Bros. established the Archive Collection, a Disc On Demand and Streaming service devoted to some of the more idiosyncratic pieces of cinema ever made. Being big fans of the label, we here at Cinapse thought it prudent to establish a column devoted to these unusual gems. Thus “The Archivist” was born — a biweekly look at some of the best, boldest and most batshit motion pictures the Shield has to offer. Some of these will be recent additions to the collection, while others will be titles that have been available for awhile. With over 1,500 pictures procurable on Warner Archive (and more being added every month), there’s no possible way we’ll get to all of them. But trust me when we say we’re sure going to try.

    Welcome, new and returning friends, to The Archivist! I spent my time off during our last episode (a very special thanks to Austin Vashaw for gallantly taking the reins — do be sure to go back and read that if you haven’t already) to dig up a few forgotten treasures.

    Now that it appears I will have to lose my overwhelming respect for Bill Cosby, I can still luxuriate in the yet untarnished body of hilarious work by the great Steve Martin. If you haven’t seen these flicks, do yourself a favor and correct that unfortunate business.

    The Man With Two Brains [1983] Dir. Carl Reiner

    I can’t fully wrap my head around how this movie could possibly not be considered an absurdist classic. This beast is more consistently funny (and by “consistently”, I mean it is never not funny) than half of Mel Brooks’ catalogue. As a slight send-up of old B Sci-fi movies, that’s an easy comparison, but The Man With Two Brains has more in common with the work of Leslie Nielsen or Zucker, Abrahams and Zucker. This is a send-up of everything. I was worried, after wiping tears away within the first ten minutes, that the movie was simply front-loaded with the great stuff, and would soon fizzle off into the same opacity as its own legacy. Not so. Like The Naked Gun, or Airplane, if you so much as sneeze while watching, you missed another great joke, and that much is true for the entire length of the film.

    Somehow, in the midst of this totally bonkers script, giving even the Monty Python boys a run for their money, Steve Martin, Carl Reiner, and George Gipe managed to craft a story with propulsion. It doesn’t rest on its thousands of jokes sewn into every line of dialogue. Instead, it gingerly guides every nutty gag through a structured plot, with legitimate motivations for its central characters, and I was surprised to be sitting there, still laughing about a joke from five minutes ago, excited to see how it would all end.

    The film even boasts a fantastic cast of actors who were never funnier. Kathleen Turner plays a comically incautious femme fatale. The great David Warner (the TGRI scientist from Secret of the Ooze) is effortlessly funny, playing a scientist, of course. James Cromwell shows up for about three seconds and gets a laugh, and I wouldn’t dare spoil whom, but an old television icon has a truly hilarious cameo in a scene near the end.

    It’s really a shame no one preaches the good word on this one. Buy it. Watch it on repeat. Tell everyone how funny it is.

    My Blue Heaven [1990], Dir. Herbert Ross

    I can’t say I was quite so enthusiastic while watching My Blue Heaven.

    This here, is a damn interesting piece of work. Released one month prior to Goodfellas, this comedy is based on the same biography as Scorsese’s beloved drama, and can, in many ways, be considered an unofficial sequel to its far more successful successor. There is a lot of good going on in the movie, but it’s all just a little too much to swallow.

    The script, written by the late Nora Ephron (Yeah… just say that one time out loud: Nora Ephron wrote the sequel to Goodfellas), is overflowing with sweetness, humor and magnetism. We would expect at least that much from the woman responsible for every decent romantic comedy ever made. It’s cute! I have no problem admitting it is adorable, but having seen Scorsese’s classic many times, knowing Ray Liotta’s character so well, I can’t help but get a little uncomfortable watching Steve Martin’s rendition.

    The whole thing takes place before Henry Hill (called Vincent Antonelli, here) finished testifying against his former partners in crime, but right after he is has been placed in witness protection. Martin is in full stereotypical Italian swagger. He has the flashy hair, he has the flashy-er suit, and he strolls around his new middle-of-nowhere suburban surroundings saying “Fuhget aboud-it!” and such. You know… like a sketch comedian would. As much as I would like to be won-over by his wiseguy wiles, it is hard to watch all of these whacky farcical antics in the context of the disturbing barbarism I know came before his time under protective custody. It’s the kind of thing you have to see, just so you can know what you thought of it. Fortunately for you, whoever you are, you will also probably enjoy your time finding out.

    Just like in The Man With Two Brains, My Blue Heaven also boasts an excellent cast doing some good work. Joan Cusack plays a lost and lonely District Attorney. A variety of familiar character actors appear as Vincent’s old friends who are now in the protection program, and Rick Moranis gives an excellent performance as (for the first time? The only time?) a regular guy. As the FBI agent assigned to keep Vicent in line until his court appearances, we don’t get the normal Moranis shtick. No super-nerdy stupidity, not that I have a problem with that, but it is truly refreshing to see him play an intelligent, human character. He wears the role rather well.

    There you have it: an exciting pair of lost comedies starring some of everyone’s favorite people.

    It’s double feature time!