Home

  • The Archivist Volume XXI: Therrrre Wolf, Therrre Albert Finney

    The Archivist Volume XXI: Therrrre Wolf, Therrre Albert Finney

    by Ryan Lewellen

    The Archivist

    Welcome to the Archive. Following the infamous “Format Wars” (R.I.P. VHS), a multitude of films found themselves in danger of being forgotten forever due to their admittedly niche appeal. Thankfully, Warner Bros. established the Archive Collection, a Disc On Demand and Streaming service devoted to some of the more idiosyncratic pieces of cinema ever made. Being big fans of the label, we here at Cinapse thought it prudent to establish a column devoted to these unusual gems. Thus “The Archivist” was born — a biweekly look at some of the best, boldest and most batshit motion pictures the Shield has to offer. Some of these will be recent additions to the collection, while others will be titles that have been available for awhile. With over 1,500 pictures procurable on Warner Archive (and more being added every month), there’s no possible way we’ll get to all of them. But trust me when we say we’re sure going to try.

    Archivists, watch your asses, and watch ’em good, because the critters in these two werewolf flicks aren’t picky about when they attack. Full moon? Crescent moon? Man in the moon? It seems the size or shape of earth’s natural satellite doesn’t figure. What’s more important is whether or not the moon is bad… or if you have been bad. Two hair-raising films from the Warner vaults, both of them toying with the cinematic tropes of the lycanthropes (one of them, a brand-spanking-new Blu-ray release), and they are both a howling good time. I did all I could to stave these beasts off until October, but I simply could not wait any longer. If you dig werewolf movies, and you need a break after your hundredth viewing of The Howling or An American Werewolf in London, these are two exciting companion pieces to any favorite wolfman movie.

    BAD MOON (1996)

    I am going to be completely honest with you, our first picture for the week sucks. That doesn’t mean you won’t have some fun watching it, though. Bad Moon, as the opening credits told me, is based on a novel named Thor. That confounded me. The pre-credits sequence involved our lead character, Ted (Michael Pare) getting laid in the jungle, when a werewolf tears his lover away… and apart… infecting Pare in the process, before the monster’s head is blown to smithereens with a shotgun. Thor? Maybe, if the Norwegian god took up a Gallagher-esque comedy routine and swapped his hammer for a ten gauge?

    My confusion was quickly settled. As the music swells, it is revealed Thor is the name of the family dog, belonging to Janet (Mariel Hemingway), who is Ted’s sister. That is the one intriguing quality this movie has to offer. The central conflict is between a man who is losing himself to his evil side, and a dog determined to keep his family safe. Therefore, the story is largely told from the dog’s perspective. That’s a challenging movie to make, and this one is by no means a success. It is extremely violent (and it certainly delivers for you gore-hounds), but it swings from those gnarly and disturbing images to a light and fluffy family tone when Thor is in a scene with anyone other than the monster. We’re talking Beethoven tone, here. It’s also the kind of low-budget horror film that doesn’t seem to understand how humans work. The performances are so odd, and the character’s choices are so stupid, you start to wonder if this wasn’t really a movie, but a series of holograms assembled by aliens in an attempt to better understand us. The experiment certainly failed, but the result is still a unique and rare (and short) chapter in the book of the werewolf movie.

    The dog gives the best performance.

    WOLFEN (1981)

    For our second feature, Woodstock director Michael Wadleigh brings you a completely fresh take on the idea of a werewolf. In Wolfen, a high-powered magnate, his wife, and their bodyguard are all brutally murdered in Battery Park. Baffling the police, the slaying couldn’t quite have been done by a human, but doesn’t appear to be done by any known animal, either. The NYPD chooses to call on grizzled, semi-retired, semi-alcoholic, and completely disillusioned detective, Dewey Wilson (the incomparable Albert Finney). With Dewey on the case, teamed with a morgue orderly (Gregory Hines) and a criminal psychologist (Diane Venora), the mystery grows deeper and darker, until no one can be completely certain who is doing the killing, from a gang of native Americans, to a terrorist cell, to an ancient species of god-like wolves.

    Albert Finney stumbles, stares, and slurs his way through an astonishingly understated performance. Wadleigh, who had only directed non-fiction features up to this point, has an incredible talent for pulling natural acting from his cast. Every player disappears into his or her character to such a convincing degree, you start to forget you are watching one of the coolest ensembles ever assembled. Edward James Olmos plays a mysterious Native American. The great Tom Noonan has a small role as a bashful zoologist. Even Tom Waits appears for a moment, crooning in Albert Finney’s favorite dive bar (nice choice, Al).

    But acting… SHMACKTING! What about the rest of the incredible work being done in this picture? The good folks at the Warner Archives have, from what I have had the pleasure of witnessing thus far, made perfect choices for the somewhat exclusive Blu-ray disc upgrade. Wolfen is no exception. This movie looks incredible, and the transfer couldn’t be nicer. Its dreamlike images, formed in exquisite framing and lighting, are practically cinematography porn. You would be frightened if you could just stop concentrating on how beautiful it is. All that conventional stuff is great, but I would be remiss if I didn’t also mention its use of “monster vision,” via Steadicam and some kind of color negative, which was directly ripped off by Predator and several other films. This movie might not be perfect, but it is inventive, artfully rendered, and supremely entertaining. See it, before the next full moon!

  • The Archivist Volume XX: Giant Monsters Eatin’ People! — With Ray Harryhausen

    The Archivist Volume XX: Giant Monsters Eatin’ People! — With Ray Harryhausen

    by Ryan Lewellen

    The Archivist

    Welcome to the Archive. Following the infamous “Format Wars” (R.I.P. VHS), a multitude of films found themselves in danger of being forgotten forever due to their admittedly niche appeal. Thankfully, Warner Bros. established the Archive Collection, a Disc On Demand and Streaming service devoted to some of the more idiosyncratic pieces of cinema ever made. Being big fans of the label, we here at Cinapse thought it prudent to establish a column devoted to these unusual gems. Thus “The Archivist” was born — a biweekly look at some of the best, boldest and most batshit motion pictures the Shield has to offer. Some of these will be recent additions to the collection, while others will be titles that have been available for awhile. With over 1,500 pictures procurable on Warner Archive (and more being added every month), there’s no possible way we’ll get to all of them. But trust me when we say we’re sure going to try.

    Archivateers, a week from now, there will be, for better or worse, a new Jurassic Park movie in theaters. To prep for what we can only hope will be a rousing two hours of screaming and stomping, I dug into the Warner back catalogue in search of a few dinosaur flicks from the pre-digital era. Semi-eureka! … as I have (in predictable Archivist fashion) found a dud, and a delight. From the height of the American radioactive monster era comes, The Giant Behemoth, and from the twilight of Ray Harryhausen’s special effects career comes, The Valley Of Gwangi. Both films keep you in suspense of their giant antagonists’ tremendous countenance, but only one is worth the wait.

    THE GIANT BEHEMOTH (1959)

    In 1959, a joint venture between American and British filmmakers began as a story about a blob of radiation challenging the survival of the human race, and resulted in a shameless rip-off of the far superior The Beast From 20,000 Fathoms. Nearly a clone of that 1953 predecessor, Behemoth opens with an unseen monster rising from the ocean and spewing radiation at a small fishing village. Along the way, his torso gets a lot of screen time (that is apparently the centralized radiation emitter), as does his pathetically stiff neck and head, and the classic stop-motion effects which got us into the theater (or into our underwear in the home office, in our case) don’t arrive until the third act. At that moment, when the monster finally comes to life, so the does the film, but it’s too little, too late.

    We are doomed to spend most of our time with a cast of uncharismatic scientist characters, who are allotted seemingly endless amounts of time in which to explain EVERYTHING about radioactivity. That’s all somewhat interesting, but a brief sequence featuring the top half of the monster idly bumping into, and sinking, a toy ferry, looking more like a duck hunter’s decoy than a mutated terror, wasn’t quite enough to get us through another 15 minutes of meaningless “blah blah blah”. It is meaningless, too, leaving every ounce of subtext and symbolism found in Godzilla, and the films it influenced, in a cinematic mushroom cloud of triviality. Not every creature feature from the nuclear age was meant to stand the test of time, and even on four legs, this one can’t stand the test of 80 minutes.

    THE VALLEY OF GWANGI (1969)

    Between Behemoth and Gwangi, there are many noteworthy connections, but none so intriguing as that of the great Willis O’Brien. Let me count the ways: Ray Harryhausen finished The Valley of Gwangi for O’Bien, his mentor. The film is, in many ways, a pastiche of The Lost World (1925) and King Kong (1933), two films upon which O’Brien built his career. Behemoth’s special effects shots were begrudgingly contracted to Willis O’Brien for a pittance, and the project was given to his assistant who was suffering from M.S. at the time. It’s amazing the animation looked so good.

    Aside from The Willis O’Brien Connection, Ray Harryhausen’s jaunty cowboys Vs. dinosaurs tale also profoundly influenced Jurassic Park, and its first sequel. You can actually see the structure of Spielberg’s Lost World taking root in Harryhausen’s picture: two parties with opposing objectives venture into a secret valley ruled by long-extinct creatures, and are forced to band together in order to survive. Sure, they are all a bunch of cowboys involved in a Wild West show instead of corporate mercenaries and eco-terrorists/paleontologists, but they even come up with the same terrible idea of bringing a T. Rex back to civilization for a new, one-of-a-kind act.

    It won’t blow your mind, and even compared to the other lesser-known works of the late stop-motion wizard, Gwangi isn’t anything super special. However, following The Giant Behemoth, it does make for a fine reminder of how to make quality adventure cinema. The characters are exciting and colorful. They are skilled performers, fast-talkers, and provide for a much-needed jocularity, considering the silly premise. It’s a shame, though, the whole movie couldn’t be great, because Ray Harryhausen always shows up for work, no matter what the project is. He does some truly extraordinary work, and instills that magical touch of character only he can, in every creature on the screen. Unfortunately, the script doesn’t quite keep his pace, but the insane, weirdly metaphorical climax (it could be saying the Christian faith can’t stand up to the existence of dinosaurs — I don’t want to say too much), and plenty of other fun moments, make this a film worth tracking down.

    If you’re gearing up to see Jurassic World, pick up Gwangi, and maybe The Beast From 20,000 Fathoms, but maybe leave the Behemoth at the bottom of the sea.

  • The Archivist Volume XIX: The MAD MAX Edition

    The Archivist Volume XIX: The MAD MAX Edition

    by Ryan Lewellen

    The Archivist

    Welcome to the Archive. Following the infamous “Format Wars” (R.I.P. VHS), a multitude of films found themselves in danger of being forgotten forever due to their admittedly niche appeal. Thankfully, Warner Bros. established the Archive Collection, a Disc On Demand and Streaming service devoted to some of the more idiosyncratic pieces of cinema ever made. Being big fans of the label, we here at Cinapse thought it prudent to establish a column devoted to these unusual gems. Thus “The Archivist” was born — a biweekly look at some of the best, boldest and most batshit motion pictures the Shield has to offer. Some of these will be recent additions to the collection, while others will be titles that have been available for awhile. With over 1,500 pictures procurable on Warner Archive (and more being added every month), there’s no possible way we’ll get to all of them. But trust me when we say we’re sure going to try.

    G’day Archiveys, I have an extra-special treat for you this week. With Mad Max: Fury Road still barreling through cinemas, it seems appropriate we should celebrate its extravagance with films covering the OZploitative, as well as the Apocalyptic. Here, we find two titles which are not necessarily excellent companion pieces to each other, but compliment the Mad Max Oeuvre beautifully. They are stylish, rugged, mostly insane, and the latter of the two even shares cast and crew in common with The Road Warrior. Buckle up, horde your weapons and ammo, and pack the Tums, because shit’s about to get messy.

    NO BLADE OF GRASS (1970)

    ASDAS

    In No Blade Of Grass, A mysterious, plant-killing virus is quickly creating a food shortage. Once riots envelop London, a wealthy Briton escapes with his family on a long and treacherous journey to his brother’s farm. The treachery runs the typical Armageddon gamut of rape, robbery, cannibalism, and belligerent biker gangs. The entire cast quickly exchanges its humanity for a new survival code, and the movie is surprisingly relentless in forcing you to practically bath in the debauchery. Every gunshot wound is bloody. The rapes are brutal and cruel. This is a new world with no rules, and the movie doesn’t seem to have any, either. Yet, despite is unflinching grotesquery and valiant effort to tell the story artfully, it yields a nagging made-for-television, after school special quality and tone.

    The whole thing is cheap. A major part of the blame rests on the tragically dated music. Every time a delicate flute lulls itself to sleep, or a wah-wah guitar tries to funk up an action sequence, I couldn’t not be distracted by memories of educational film strips from my elementary school days. That “THIS MOVIE WAS MADE IN THE SEVENTIES” musical announcement cuts right through any solemn message its painful events might try to convey. The lighting is bland (though the framing is on-point), and the acting and writing are humdrum. In the end, the project mostly feels obsolete and pointless, despite how many of its environmental issues are contemporary concerns. Still, you have to hand it to a film which, had it found an audience, could clearly have been a major influence on so many memorable works to come. Fortunately for us, the influence came from several similar pictures.

    RAZORBACK (1984)

    Razorback, on the other hand, is a lively blast of intense style. American journalist, Beth Winters, heads to Australia, hoping she can break a story on animal poaching by a pet food company. When she discovers, the very hard way, not all outback critters are helpless prey, her husband, Carl, follows her to the Down Under, hoping to discover his missing wife’s fate. Along the way, he meets Jake (a kind of half-breed between Quint from Jaws, and Captain Ahab), who lost his grandson to an enormous wild boar. Aside from Jake, the film holds many other similarities to Jaws, and every other monster movie Jaws influenced. There is a framework here that won’t exactly keep you guessing, but the film’s surreal imagery will surprise you often.

    Right from the start, director Russell Mulcahy is putting a unique stamp on Razorback, showing his eclectic experience as a prolific music video director. Its familiar story and stock characters may not stick with me, but Mulcahy’s shots, aided by Dean Semler’s (The Road Warrior) keen eye for eerie cinematography, will never leave me (I’ve already had a dream about this movie). The film is overflowing with eye-watering visions, gut-wrenching violence, and just a little touch of sex, but it was one of the least successful works from late in the ozploitation era. I can see why, considering the third act is nothing but predictable monster movie plotting, and a gallon of 80s cheese whiz. It even ends on a freeze frame, for god’s sake. Even so, this is a film well worth your time because it shows you so much you have never seen before, and showcases the talents of, as mentioned above, the great Dean Semler, as well as actress Arkie Whitely (the headband/pony tail lady from The Road Warrior), and further connection to Mad Max 2 as it was mostly filmed at Broken Hill. Max is all over this thing, making it a delight for any dedicated cinephile. Seeing these elements in a new setting is truly fascinating.

    If you still haven’t seen Mad Max: Fury Road (What the hell is wrong with you? Haven’t you been reading this site?), go see that five times, watch the second film in the series twice, then watch Razorback. You can watch No Blade Of Grass if you insist, but don’t tell them I sent you.

  • THE PYRAMID Should Be Entombed

    THE PYRAMID Should Be Entombed

    by Ryan Lewellen

    During the 2013 Egyptian protests, a father-daughter team of archeologists discovers a buried pyramid unlike any other manmade structure. A documentary crew is cataloguing their progress, when the social unrest begins threatening their dig. Fully intending to leave, they decide to use what little time they have sending a rover, on loan from NASA, into their discovery to satisfy their collective curiosity. When the brave (and expensive) robot goes missing, however, they are forced to search for it, get lost immediately, and make one stupid decision after another until they are all dead. Trust me. That’s not spoiling a damn thing.

    I was lured into watching this boo-boo by the promise it was “accidental comedy” material. It was certainly an accident, but there isn’t much to laugh at in this joyless affair. The characters are non-existent, the performances are weak, the script is thin to the point of vanishing, the effects are something out of 90s television, and worst of all, it ruins a perfectly cool idea.

    Here is the deal. I am ASKING you not to watch this movie, because it is a waste of your time. I don’t care if you spend all of your time sticking q-tips too far into your ear, and never learning from the experience. That sounds like a fulfilling afternoon activity compared to watching The Pyramid. So, the big third-act discovery is something I feel no guilt in revealing and discussing in this review. You have been warned.

    It turns out this pyramid was buried for a damn good reason. The gods of ancient Egypt were very real. The most dreaded and still earthbound among them was Anubis, who started tearing out the still-beating hearts of his followers in search of a soul pure enough to reunite him with his father, Osiris, in the afterlife. After a few centuries of their organs being weighed against Ma’at, it seems the people of Egypt decided to dispatch this nasty tyrant (an intriguing comparison to the modern day uprising which is the film’s setting). The team is being chased by a bunch of bony cat demons, and then by something larger, and then, there he is: Jackyl-headed Anubis, completely robbed of his glory by terrible CGI and a complete lack of understanding in the composition department.

    How cool could that have been? That is a really creepy and fun idea! In more capable hands, this phoned-in act of boredom could have been a beauty of a low-budget horror film! They manage to get a few nasty deaths in there, including some face melting, but there is very little entertainment to speak of, and absolutely no intellectual engagement to note. It can’t even choose a format.

    This movie begins in found footage. It gives you a brief preface about a disappearance, and opens on a number of first person perspective handheld shots during the exposition. Then, as though the pyramid has a maximum occupancy rule, a new camera seems to be added every time a cast member bites the dust. They don’t entirely give up on the primary format, however, and if anything could make found footage less effective, it would most certainly be half-assed found footage. The movie insists on cutting back to the perspective of the documentary cameraman, who is truly shooting all of this for no reason, since their cameras are not the only way we can witness these events. The ineptitude boggles the mind. That lack of continuity, if nothing else, will finally give you something to think about while watching, other than who could possibly have thought up the line, “When will you stop being an archeologist and start being a human being?”

    Avoid.

    The Pyramid is now available on Blu-ray and DVD from Twentieth Century Fox Home Entertainment

  • The Archivist Volume XVIII — Spectacular Animation From Ralph Bakshi And Chuck Jones

    The Archivist Volume XVIII — Spectacular Animation From Ralph Bakshi And Chuck Jones

    by Ryan Lewellen

    Welcome to the Archive. Following the infamous “Format Wars” (R.I.P. VHS), a multitude of films found themselves in danger of being forgotten forever due to their admittedly niche appeal. Thankfully, Warner Bros. established the Archive Collection, a Disc On Demand and Streaming service devoted to some of the more idiosyncratic pieces of cinema ever made. Being big fans of the label, we here at Cinapse thought it prudent to establish a column devoted to these unusual gems. Thus “The Archivist” was born — a biweekly look at some of the best, boldest and most batshit motion pictures the Shield has to offer. Some of these will be recent additions to the collection, while others will be titles that have been available for awhile. With over 1,500 pictures procurable on Warner Archive (and more being added every month), there’s no possible way we’ll get to all of them. But trust me when we say we’re sure going to try.

    So glad you could all make it, you children-of-all-ages, back to The Archivist! I am so excited to have had the chance to see two almost-forgotten animated features from two giants of American fine-tooning. Chuck Jones had an illustrious career in the realms of Looney Tunes as well as Merrie Melodies, and for his picking up the Tom And Jerry torch and producing 34 episodes with a completely distinct style. Ralph Bakshi, who might unfortunately be renowned solely for directing Fritz The Cat and The Lord Of The Rings, has a rich filmography comprised of groundbreaking and controversial features that hypnotize and provoke. The Warner Archives offers a variety of animated gems, possibly none so intriguing as the two I watched this week.

    THE PHANTOM TOLLBOOTH

    In 1970, Chuck Jones and his collaborators adapted Norman Juster’s beloved children’s book, The Phantom Tollbooth, into a cinematic beauty. “What’s to become of Milo?” asks the perfectly syrupy ’70s opening theme. A fine question, considering the song’s subject is a boy living a life of privilege and comfort, who seems to have no interest in living, at all. He stares blankly into the void during the many important lessons of the school day, and mopes his way home, oblivious to the exciting sights and sounds his daily route provides in abundance. On this day, however, a mysterious package arrives, transforms into a tollbooth promising thrills, and Milo is transformed into an animated adventurer. On his journey through The Doldrums, Dictionopolis, Digitopolis, and other such places, he makes colorful friends, battles a few monsters, sings a couple of songs, and learns paramount lessons in leading a valuable life.

    If you can’t get your kid to read, sit that ignorant little butt down in front of this movie! This is the kind of art that stimulates a young mind from as many angles as possible, and proves not only that learning is fun and important, but also that knowledge can be used to entertain and improve the world. Who knows? It could even make a reader out of her/him. I don’t want to make this sound like Sesame Street; Milo is on a perilous journey! He uses his imagination to escape demons, he uses logic to reunite kingdoms, and literally uses wordplay to kill racism, hypocrisy, stagnation. The movie is slightly dated (he uses “industry” to fight “laziness”) and doesn’t exactly move at the perfect clip, but it boasts plenty of wondrous sites and ideas to hold your attention and imagination. Check ‘er out.

    HEY GOOD LOOKIN’

    From a film that seems to have everything on its mind, we transition to Ralph Bakshi’s Hey Good Lookin’, a film which appears to have nothing on its mind, other than a serious breast fetish. Intended as a combination of live action and animation (a feat he would later achieve with Cool World), Bakshi’s film about a pair of greaser gang leaders occupied by the dual mission of ruling the streets and getting laid claims, in its tagline, to “bring you the outrageous ’50s the way they really were.” Apparently the ’50s were terrifying. The amorphous character forms stretch and skew and writhe their way through the movie. Not in that charming Bakshi way, either. I am telling you watching this film is mostly like watching somebody’s limp, rubbery nightmares. The visuals are taxing, but also stimulating (in more than one way), and most viewers won’t be able to look away. The real problem is the script.

    Who knows what must have been lost during the long process between the director’s creative inception and the cut the studio finally agreed to release. The result, as it is immortalized on DVD, is a film mostly about misogyny, cowardice, and insanity. Women are not treated well at all in or by the movie, and the final moments of the third act are so baffling, I was almost angry for having watched it. Examining the framing device, however, and a couple of other faintly outlined thematic elements, one could draw up a concept of a critique of proceeding generations’ blind faith in the existence of “the good old days.” There is a particularly sharp bit opening the film involving garbage, and a garbage can, debating the existence of heaven. The movie seems to stumble so far from that biting satire long before it circles back around to a similar idea, it resolves with a feeling of pointlessness. Still, if you’re a Bakshi completist (and you should be), I doubt you will feel your time been wasted.

    So slick back your hair, open your mind, and venture your way into a land of boobies and syntax! It’s double feature time!

  • The Archivist Volume XVII — Adam West and Cathy Lee Crosby Star In Goofy DC Television

    The Archivist Volume XVII — Adam West and Cathy Lee Crosby Star In Goofy DC Television

    Welcome to the Archive. Following the infamous “Format Wars” (R.I.P. VHS), a multitude of films found themselves in danger of being forgotten forever due to their admittedly niche appeal. Thankfully, Warner Bros. established the Archive Collection, a Disc On Demand and Streaming service devoted to some of the more idiosyncratic pieces of cinema ever made. Being big fans of the label, we here at Cinapse thought it prudent to establish a column devoted to these unusual gems. Thus “The Archivist” was born — a biweekly look at some of the best, boldest and most batshit motion pictures the Shield has to offer. Some of these will be recent additions to the collection, while others will be titles that have been available for awhile. With over 1,500 pictures procurable on Warner Archive (and more being added every month), there’s no possible way we’ll get to all of them. But trust me when we say we’re sure going to try.

    Welcome back, Archivists! This week, with another Marvel Cinematic Universe episode hitting theaters, I thought it would be a good idea to explore some of the many DC properties The Warner Archives has available for your viewing… pleasure? I can’t say I found my experience with these two titles very pleasurable. I could hardly muddle through one of them. Apparently the label’s characters weren’t always so well represented as they are on today’s popular television shows. The early days weren’t all bad, of course. You probably know and love the Adam West Batman show from the 60s, but did you know he also played the role in a pair of variety show-style “comedy” romps complete with a laugh track? You probably know, and might love, the 70s Wonder Woman series, starring Lynda Carter, but did you know tennis pro Cathy Lee Crosby actually originated the role in a failed pilot? You might find it interesting to see that character’s live-action origins, or think it’s neat to see Mr. West and Burt Ward reprise their iconic roles almost a decade after they had hung up their capes, but I will have a hard time recommending either of these ridiculous trifles.

    Let’s get this week’s mega-stinker out of the way. I had heard about Legends Of The Superheroes from multiple trusted sources. 70s babies remember it fondly, and they claimed I had to see it because it was both bizarre and hilarious. It’s bizarre, all right, but not only is it completely unfunny, it is so stagey and stale, it becomes painfully hard to watch. This is the kind of horrible that makes me feel embarrassed. That isn’t embarrassment on behalf of the people involved, I mean I start to think to myself, “God… at least nobody knows I’m watching this.”

    In the first episode, The Challenge, The Legion of Doom, lead by Mordru, has created a doomsday device, and commissioned The Riddler (Frank Gorshin!) to devise a series of clues to keep The Justice League busy on their mission to save the proverbial day. Each clue is a setup for another stupid gag, including The Riddler posing as a Freud-like psychiatrist, and the dynamic duo racing Mordru on jet skis. In the second TV special, The Roast, the sad situation gets even worse. Ed MacMahon (the only cast member capable of culling a couple limp laughs) hosts a roast. That’s right: a Friar’s Club Roast between The Justice League and The Legion of Doom. Think about how awful that sounds. Now, turn the stupid up to ten and you might come close to how terrible it really is. These actors couldn’t make the comedy happen in a more straight-ahead, good vs. evil comic book story set up, how could they possibly do it when they are expected to tell jokes? It makes the bomb gag from Batman: The Movie look like classic comedy gold (which… it kind of already was).

    The almost-worst thing about these specials is, if it weren’t for the laugh track, it would play like bad high school theater. The worst-worst thing about it is a character called Ghetto Man who struts onto the stage and does uncomfortable racial humor. “The Green Lantern don’t qualify for ‘colored people’.” Do I need to go on? It’s unbelievable.

    The 1974 Wonder Woman Pilot, on the other hand, was kind enough to at least begin with some promise. It features a funky acid jazz theme song, the acting is surprisingly strong (could we expect anything but strength from Ricardo Montalban as the primary antagonist?), and the script is solid… until it isn’t. Cathy Lee Crosby’s version is still an Amazon, but along with a sans-tiara and lasso costume, she is also more of a highly skilled double-agent than a superhero. After books containing the secret identities of her fellow agents are stolen, she must travel to France and retrieve them.

    The movie opens with some women’s lib convictions, but abandons them completely about 20 minutes in. I was kind of happy about that, only because it was taking a sort of condescending tone with the theme. Wonder Woman’s tribal leader on Paradise Island spouts a monologue about how important it is to show men how strong women can be, but reminds her to also show their most important value: sensitivity. Once you muscle past that silliness, and the sillier/creepier father-daughter relationship she seems to have with her boss at the agency, there is some good shooting and witty dialogue to enjoy. Then, the action takes off… like a half-inflated balloon.

    I was willing to forgive a few illogical steps in plotting and character motivations until our hero has to fight, bow staff to bow staff, against one of her greedy Amazon sisters. It was like watching two people go at it with weapons they don’t know how to use, and choreography they forgot to memorize. The awkward sequence is clumsily sewn together by a kind of slow motion close up patchwork. Just like the rest of the film, this scene just doesn’t quite come together. Only a year later, the iconic Wonder Woman series we know today premiered on ABC.

    Normally I have some dumb joke here that ties the movies together with snack food, but… I really have to say you should watch the original Adam West Batman movie, and… anything else, instead.

  • The Archivist Volume XVI: Sort of John Turturro — BEING HUMAN [1994] and BRAIN DONORS [1992]

    The Archivist Volume XVI: Sort of John Turturro — BEING HUMAN [1994] and BRAIN DONORS [1992]

    Welcome to the Archive. Following the infamous “Format Wars” (R.I.P. VHS), a multitude of films found themselves in danger of being forgotten forever due to their admittedly niche appeal. Thankfully, Warner Bros. established the Archive Collection, a Disc On Demand and Streaming service devoted to some of the more idiosyncratic pieces of cinema ever made. Being big fans of the label, we here at Cinapse thought it prudent to establish a column devoted to these unusual gems. Thus “The Archivist” was born — a biweekly look at some of the best, boldest and most batshit motion pictures the Shield has to offer. Some of these will be recent additions to the collection, while others will be titles that have been available for awhile. With over 1,500 pictures procurable on Warner Archive (and more being added every month), there’s no possible way we’ll get to all of them. But trust me when we say we’re sure going to try.

    Archiviteers, I have to begin this week’s installment with a confession. Originally, the plan was to recommend a double-feature covering Being Human and The World According To Garp. Well, for your information, the latter title is no longer available from The Warner Archives. Sad news, I know. After several lengthy sojourns through Warner’s lovely pit of cinematic resurrection, I couldn’t seem to find anything that quite sounded like the perfect match for Being Human. Obviously, the whole point was to select two films featuring performances by the late Robin Williams, but in a pinch, I couldn’t help but notice the noble comedic tribute Brain Donors was being preserved in The Archives. That film just happens to have John Turturro, and absolutely nothing else, in common with that Williams film for which I so badly needed a companion piece. So, without further disclaiming, let me tell you about a movie that barely has John Turturro in it, and another that has almost too much of him.

    I am still reeling from the death of Robin Williams. I hadn’t been very interested in his most recent work, so seeing a lost film from earlier in his illustrious career is a true joy. Being Human cuts five slices of life from human history which allow us to watch one deeply flawed man find his way through the loss and reunion of his family, among other things. We meet Hector (Williams) as a homo sapien cave dweller, then he is a slave in Rome (to his master, John Turturro), then a Scottish servant to a priest in the crusades, a shipwrecked Portuguese Renaissance-era nobleman, and finally, a modern day business man who has estranged himself from his kids. He is cowardly, selfish, and can rarely manage to do the right thing.

    The performances are excellent all around from a cast including Vincent D’Onofrio, Robert Carlyle, Theresa Russell, Bill Nighy, William H. Macy, and Lorraine Bracco. These actors do as much for some notable authenticity in each era as the set design and costuming. Each episode creates a surprisingly rich atmosphere to explore, accompanying the increasingly intriguing and often funny adventures of Hector. That’s a fine achievement, but the film itself is not. Apparently director Bill Forsythe lost control of the expensive production, and Warner Brothers’ oversight is responsible for a hacky, on-the-nose narration read by Theresa Russell over the soundtrack, as well as the enforcement of a happy ending. Let me be clear, this is no turd, but the “improvements” resulting from studio interference do great damage to a film which would otherwise have been a fascinating, deliberately paced experience. There is some pay-off in the end, as we realize the life story Williams’ character details to his children parallels that of the five different Hectors throughout history. That’s a lovely revelation, considering the first couple of episodes seemed, at first, nearly pointless. This one is definitely flawed, but I won’t be calling up the universe to demand my time be reimbursed.

    And now for something completely different…

    Here is it folks, the John Turturro part of the supposed John Turturro double feature. David and Jerry Zucker (some of the Airpane! and Naked Gun guys) took on a rather intimidating challenge when they produced a film working under the title Lame Ducks. The Zuckers, writer Pat Proft (who wrote basically every non-Mel Brooks parody movie), and director Dennis Dugan (oh god… google the guy’s filmography for yourself) came together, and despite studio interference from Paramount, managed to create a pretty damn solid update of The Marx Brothers’ A Night at the Opera. Turturro (in the Groucho role), Mel Smith (Chico), and Bob Nelson (Harpo) do some extraordinary work as facsimiles of the comedy legends. Nelson is especially wonderful as Jacques, a not entirely mute but fully loveable stand-in for Harpo. His timing is phenomenal, and his dedication to the role really shines while juggling the enormous prop arsenal the silent Marx Brother so often plucked from the infinite. They may not be perfect impressions, but if any trio of actors could give The Marx Brothers a run for their money, then what the hell would be so special about The Marx Brothers?

    As one would expect from the Zuckers, Brain Donors (a title selected by the studio) boasts a bombastic whirlwind of jokes from minute one. Most of them land gloriously, but this is not a perfect comedy. One or two jokes will hit the ground and roll near the target, while others will soar so far into the distance, it’s hard to know where they were aiming. The more I think about it, however, the more I realize how nit-picky that seems in retrospect. I had a great time watching this movie. My girlfriend would walk into the room from time to time, paying no attention to the screen, laugh at a joke she heard, and stick around to see what would happen next. It’s a lot of fun, especially for those of us who grew up watching classic comedians like The Three Stooges or Laurel and Hardy. Seek this thing out!

  • THE ARCHIVIST Volume XV: Insane Italian Sci-Fi Adventures With WILD, WILD PLANET and WAR OF THE…

    THE ARCHIVIST Volume XV: Insane Italian Sci-Fi Adventures With WILD, WILD PLANET and WAR OF THE…

    Welcome to the Archive. Following the infamous “Format Wars” (R.I.P. VHS), a multitude of films found themselves in danger of being forgotten forever due to their admittedly niche appeal. Thankfully, Warner Bros. established the Archive Collection, a Disc On Demand and Streaming service devoted to some of the more idiosyncratic pieces of cinema ever made. Being big fans of the label, we here at Cinapse thought it prudent to establish a column devoted to these unusual gems. Thus “The Archivist” was born — a biweekly look at some of the best, boldest and most batshit motion pictures the Shield has to offer. Some of these will be recent additions to the collection, while others will be titles that have been available for awhile. With over 1,500 pictures procurable on Warner Archive (and more being added every month), there’s no possible way we’ll get to all of them. But trust me when we say we’re sure going to try.

    Welcome back, you sexy astronomers! It’s time to venture (far) out into the final frontier with a couple low-budget science fiction pseudo-classics in this installment of The Archivist! B-movie maestro, Antonio Margheriti (Anthony M. Dawson on American screens) made a most insane stateside cinematic invasion with two back-to-back campy romps featuring the adventures of Commander Mike Halstead. He and his scrappy team of officers defend The 1960s Of The Future against whacky conquerors from within and without.

    A scientist attempts to create a “perfect” race of human hybrids by any means necessary.

    It is a rule too often observed that older films couldn’t live up to their vibrant and enticing poster artwork. Wild, Wild Planet isn’t quite an exception to that rule, but it comes awfully close. The poster boasts a wealth of action that, from the opening credits, we can tell couldn’t possibly be delivered by its modest production values. That being said, that measly budget does provide a lot of colorful whimsy, charm, and laughs. Amongst the endless library of B pictures from the classical era, this is in that much smaller category of goofy films completely worth your time. Sometimes, you just want to watch something that will make you smile.

    I found myself grinning ear to ear for nearly every second of this lively and ambitious little movie. I have seen plenty of Italian genre films before this, so I was prepared for sub-standard ADR. But nothing could have prepared me for the screenwriters’ apparently sub-standard acquaintance with the English language. One of the film’s greatest joys materializes in the form of dialogue that just isn’t… right. After only a few minutes of conversation between some chief cast members, I tried to remember if I had hit my head or something. It’s not complete nonsense, and there are a few moments of genuinely witty exchange, but about every five minutes, somebody says something that is just a couple steps to the left of correct. Be prepared to be audibly asking the empty darkness in which you view the film, “What the hell?”

    Many aspects of the film will inspire such a question, but the material that does make sense should carry you through the confusion. The special effects are, indeed, strung together on the lowest of budgets (think Thunderbirds), but are coherent, and often surprisingly effective! The film ends with a giant underground bunker flooding with about one million gallons of blood (yeah, it hella-goes-there), and somehow watching a bunch of miniature sets populated with stiff doll stand-ins be destroyed by slow-motion kool-aid really grossed me out. Between its adorable effects work, a couple sincerely kick ass fight scenes, and one of the earliest performances from Franco Nero, this movie makes for some supremely nerdy fun.

    A gas-like alien species threatens to possess the entire human population for nefarious purposes.

    War Of The Planets, (maybe shot at the same time as its predecessor — they were released the same year and look exactly the same) is a shockingly different film. The light and swinging vibe found in the previous picture has been abandoned, and the result is a film with the same cheap quality, that desperately tries to hold up a spare plot, with a darker tone and no dramatic propulsion.

    Although I have to admit the work on both of these films largely demonstrate poor filmmaking, some credit is due for crafty shooting and editing. Many scenes would easily provide thrills if only we could possibly take the movie seriously enough to invest in its characters. Quick cuts, intense close-ups, and disturbing soundscapes do all they can, but by the time the movie is ready to make us jump or scream or feel for a character in trouble, it has already unintentionally caused us to laugh too many times to respond to its sudden visceral evocations.

    For the most part, however, both films make for interesting viewing. Just as I can understand why Warner Brothers sees these works fit for preservation, I see how Margheriti developed a reputation for “working wonders” on a barely-there budget. I would like to know just how little money he had. He created rather detailed worlds with a willing and energetic cast, and showed this steadfast cinephile a handful of things he had never seen before. That’s got to count for something, right?

    So laser blast an ice-cold juice capsule, and orbit a bowl of popcorn. It’s double-feature time!

  • 2015 Kansas City Japanese Film Festival

    2015 Kansas City Japanese Film Festival

    Last year I attended the Kansas City Japanese Film festival for the first time, and with a solid lineup of films it turned out to be my favorite local film events, as well as one of my first articles for Cinapse. So this year I couldn’t wait to attend again but the timing conflicted with our own film event in Austin, NYC is Effed. As it turned out, weather kept me local. This was immensely disappointing but with a silver lining — I once again got to head to the Kansas City Alamo Drafthouse for an afternoon of Nihon-no Eiga.

    As in previous years, proceeds from event admissions benefit the Taylor Anderson Memorial Fund to create English reading rooms and educational programs in the tsunami-affected Tohoku region of Japan. The fund is named in honor of an American teacher in the JET program whose life was lost in the tsunami of 2011.

    (Note: Due to time constraints I actually couldn’t attend the entire festival, managing to catch only the two middle entries. I have seen all four films in the lineup, though.)

    The Hidden Fortress (1958)
    Director: Akira Kurosawa

    A pair of bumbling peasants caught up in a feudal war flee from battle and get pulled into a series of escalating adventures that they don’t understand. They cross paths with a fierce and mysterious warrior who invites them to join him, along with his female traveling companion, on a quest for gold bullion which was lost in the battle. What they don’t realize is that their new partners are the displaced princess and her most trusted general.

    The film is well known for its influence on Star Wars, and is certainly required watching for fans. The peasants, one short and one tall, are peripheral to the events but caught in the middle of them, much like droids R2-D2 and C-3PO, and Leia can be traced to Kurosawa’s feisty rebel princess. Some other similarities include early scenes set in a rocky landscape, a friend returning to stage a last-second rescue, and a closing throne room scene in which the protagonists are rewarded for their efforts.

    Pom Poko (1994)
    Director: Isao Takahata

    When encroaching urban development endangers wild habitat of tanuki (Japanese raccoon) colonies, they must forget their animalistic territorial disputes and band together against the threat of humans.

    Those who are only familiar with Studio Ghibli’s films directed by Hayao Miyazaki may be surprised that Pom Poko’s visual style is much more eclectic. Rather than sticking directly to a consistently realistic look, it includes both ultra-realistic and very cartoony elements, in service to the imaginative plot. In Japanese folklore, tanukis are said to have powers of disguise and transformation (another pop culture example of this is Super Mario Bros 3’s Tanooki Suit, which allows the player to transform into a statue). In the film, this ability allows the tanukis not only to switch between realistic and cartoony forms, but to transform into objects and other animals. The most skilled among them can even live among humans.

    The film is really quite a lot darker than I expected, with some melancholy themes and a resolution that’s bittersweet at best. While it clearly has some strong environmental themes, they serve the plot and are authentic rather than overtly preachy (unlike that stinker The Lorax).

    Uzumasa Limelight (2014)
    Director: Ken Ochiai

    For many, this new film was likely the outlier in a group of well known classics — new in 2014 and unseen by nearly everyone. The film was selected by Michael Bugajski, President of the Heartland JET Alumni Association. Michael briefly introduced the film and mentioned its relationship to Charlie Chaplin’s Limelight. Both films feature an aging entertainer who takes on a young female protégé. In Uzumasu’s case, it’s Seizô Fukumoto who plays the lead: Seiichi Kamiyama, a veteran kirare-yaku (an actor who specializes in death scenes in samurai films). Appropriately, Fukumoto himself has been such an actor for nearly 50 years, and Uzumasa Limelight is his first starring role at 71. He plays the role with bruised dignity and quiet courage that makes him endearing to the audience.

    The movie has a shot-on-video appearance that looks cheap and television-like, but what appears to be low-budget artificiality is actually an interesting stylization. The in-movie film scenes take on a more film-like appearance, creating two planes of fiction, each with their own look.

    Rashomon (1950)
    Director: Akira Kurosawa

    When a man is killed, and his wife raped, the conflicting stories put forth in the ensuing hearing each tell wildly different versions of the events. Emphasizing the inherent bias of perception and unreliability of eyewitness testimony, the story has become such a common part of our film language that it’s constantly referenced and repeated in popular media. Courtroom dramas in particular bear Rashomon a great debt for setting the template for such storytelling. Generally considered one of Kurosawa’s masterpieces, the film is also notable for marking the debut of Toshiro Mifune, who would go on to become one of Japan’s most celebrated actors, collaborating with Kurosawa on many films.

    For me, it’s not until the final moments of the film that it really all comes together. I won’t spoil it for anyone who hasn’t seen it, but the final interaction of the woodcutter and priest moved me greatly and elevated a good film to a great one.

    With another great lineup of film selections, the Japanese Film fest was once again a great time at the movies with a mix of classic and contemporary, live action and animated films. Thanks again to the sponsors who made this event possible:
    Heartland JET Alumni Association
    Kansas City Art Institute
    Heart of America Japan-America-Society
    Consulate General of Japan at Chicago

    A/V Out.

  • THE ARCHIVIST Volume XIV: Jagger Struts In FREEJACK [1992] and PERFORMANCE [1970]

    THE ARCHIVIST Volume XIV: Jagger Struts In FREEJACK [1992] and PERFORMANCE [1970]

    Welcome to the Archive. Following the infamous “Format Wars” (R.I.P. VHS), a multitude of films found themselves in danger of being forgotten forever due to their admittedly niche appeal. Thankfully, Warner Bros. established the Archive Collection, a Disc On Demand and Streaming service devoted to some of the more idiosyncratic pieces of cinema ever made. Being big fans of the label, we here at Cinapse thought it prudent to establish a column devoted to these unusual gems. Thus “The Archivist” was born — a biweekly look at some of the best, boldest and most batshit motion pictures the Shield has to offer. Some of these will be recent additions to the collection, while others will be titles that have been available for awhile. With over 1,500 pictures procurable on Warner Archive (and more being added every month), there’s no possible way we’ll get to all of them. But trust me when we say we’re sure going to try.

    Hey all you mad wild babies! Welcome back to The Archivist. I continue to learn my Roman Numerals, and you continue to learn about the endless Warner Brothers back-catalogue of cinematic wonders! This week’s installment finds the gyrating wonder, Mick Jagger, as you might have never seen him before! With Die Antwoord’s actorial debut apparently coming up short in Chappie, I thought it appropriate to check out another musician stretching a pair of thespian wings. Jagger exercised his respectable acting chops in a handful of diverse films, and The W.B. Archives offers two very cool movies from his sparse film career. I can’t tell you how excited I am to tell you about one of them (although, they are both pretty great).

    In Freejack, Emilio Estevez (looking so baby-faced, I would sooner believe him as the Mighty Ducks’ team captain, than head coach) plays a promising F1 racer who is sucked out of his own timeline and into the future (2009…Ha! Stupid movie! That’s already the past, losers!), where the super rich live inside a giant fence and can store their minds in a giant computer just long enough to be placed in some poor schmuck’s body from the past before they truly die. It’s based on a Robert Sheckley novel called Immortality INC., and that source material was apparently butchered in favor of several car chases and other shenanigans. It’s admittedly a poor film, but it shouldn’t be forgotten. I can understand its obscurity considering it came out in 1992, in the wake of icons like Basic Instinct, A Few Good Men, and Batman Returns, but it has an interesting place in the early ’90s Cyber Punk fascination. It also earns points for being a time travel movie whose premise allows for the protagonist to tell supporting characters who he is without the tedious rigors of convincing everyone he is not insane. People understand his highly dangerous situation (in what has become a way of life for them) as soon as he explains, and their reactions are always thrilling.

    Mick Jagger doesn’t capture a ton of screen time in this one. He plays a mercenary who, even after being fired, insists on capturing Estevez’s character. His character is a lot of fun, and Jagger seems to be treating his character with no more care than the director did with the rest of the production. He phones it in with just enough charm to strike a smile or two. It’s just fun to see him do his thing, as an appealing character, especially in a squeaky pair of leather pants.

    Speaking of which, the movie is kinda goofy. Estevez doesn’t quite sell the one-liners they fed him with the same bravado of the muscle-bound action stars of the day, and considering the script’s shallowness, the action isn’t quite exciting enough to…excite. It does offer some fun production design, and if you are a science fiction diehard, its well-worth your time, in spite of itself.

    God…where the hell to start with tonight’s B picture (which is really the A picture)…

    Performance chaotically intertwines the lives of Chas (James Fox), a ferocious London mafia enforcer, and Turner (Mick Jagger), a reclusive, disenchanted rock star. Chas is looking for an escape from his soured mafia ties, and Turner is looking to reconnect with his “demon” in order to recharge his songwriting energies. After Jagger’s character makes his mid-film entrance, they play a lot of dress-up, do a lot of bathing, and have a lot of sex (Turner had been in the middle of a ménage à trois). The dream can’t last forever, and after the two engage in a lengthy tug of war between their identities…something happens.

    The movie opens with a bombastic torrent of exposition. The editing featured in the first 20 minutes is so overwhelming, I was almost too exhausted to continue. I’m not trying to scare you away from this experience in telling you that. I am trying to prepare you for a movie I think everyone needs to see. It may be challenging, but it is every bit as rewarding as long as you are willing to give yourself over to a movie that is just as much art as it is pure entertainment. It is a true work of cinema; one that tells you even more in its cinematography and editing than it does with its dialogue, and still manages to leave room for enough style to do nothing but exhilarate. Every moment of the movie’s time is filled with something provocative and engaging.

    I had to routinely remind myself I was watching something from The Warner Archives, and not a lost classic picked up by one of our boutique labels. No offense to the other films I’ve covered for this column, but it seems like the majority of the titles under the Archive Collection label have been a few frames short of quality, rather than a few frames short of genius. I’ve had a lot of fun digging into their under appreciated works, but I have never been so thrilled by a movie in the catalogue thus far.

    I won’t accept anyone telling me I only loved this movie for it being full of boobs and violence, either. Sure, Anita Pallenberg’s scantily-clad presence as a kind of antagonistic bohemian spiritual sex guru to James Fox’s character might be appealing, but it’s the dense feverishness of the film’s art that will stick with me forever. Besides, you need her in a movie constantly challenging gender and sexual identity with Jagger (and another character…who is hard to explain) being such an androgynous force of nature. This movie is the most complicated look at the “sex, drugs, and rock and roll generation,” and it blows Easy Rider right out of the water, from both a filmmaking standpoint and as an artistic representation of that time and place.

    It also invented the music video. It features a music sequence, complete with a fantastic original song by Mick Jagger, yet had it come out in the ’90s, critics would have pooped on the entire movie’s frenetic style for its use of “the MTV edit.”

    I need to stop…just see the damn thing. Jagger’s performance really shines…every performance does, and this Blu-ray release offers a few cool special features too, a rarity among Archive products.

    So save yourself from being possessed by a dying rich guy, and have a mushroom trip in the key of Mick Jagger.

    It’s double-feature time!